#BREAKING: Supreme Court rules against Trump adding citizenship question to 2020 US Census

[the cac mamba]

look dummies...the census is done to count the number of people in the country. it's literally in the constitution.

why do you hate the constitution?

you mean the constitution that was written in the 1700s by rich white landowners who thought only other rich white landowners should be able to vote and hold office, and didnt consider blacks to be human beings? the constitution we've had to amend several times as we've progressed because...the country has changed?

that constitution?

 

[ADevilYouKhow]

technically, it's not the federal governments business which state you choose to live in, and how your locally elected politicians decide to tax you. you choose to live there, and the services you get is the benefit of that

in the eyes of the federal government, explain to me why someone living in NYC making 50 thousand should owe them less than someone in south dakota making 50 thousand?

let's hear it, jekyll

This is jibberish


Double taxation is against American values and may well be unconstitutional.


You’re paying taxes on money you never had


That’s all the time I have for you today

 

[the cac mamba]

This is jibberish

it was a pleasure engaging one of your aliases in conversation :jaymelo: i didnt expect you to answer that

 

[acri1]

the federal government doesnt budget ambulances and fire trucks

So you think only the federal government uses census data?

the major flaw in your argument is that it doesn't have an end point. im arguing that the federal government should take a census of its citizens, which is pretty cut and dry. your position is so open ended and ridiculous that it just doesnt really make any point at all

The endpoint is simple: The census should be accurate.

Your idea that it's only supposed to count citizens is silly and has never been the law.

 

[the cac mamba]

So you think only the federal government uses census data?



The endpoint is simple: The census should be accurate.

Your idea that it's only supposed to count citizens is silly and has never been the law.

how can it ever be accurate when you insist on counting people who live off the grid

im fine with counting people. all i said was that it's pathetic to frame a citizen check box as racist. it's one of the most embarrassing arguments the democrats have ever made

 

[the cac mamba]

i have to again at the constitution being brought up

it's fine to toss it aside, because the founding fathers could have never conceived of the electoral college becoming so unbalanced because of population. but lets bring it back up again when the narrative has to shift to catering to people who came here illegally

 

[acri1]

how can it ever be accurate when you insist on counting people who live off the grid

By counting them

im fine with counting people. all i said was that it's pathetic to frame a citizen check box as racist. it's one of the most embarrassing arguments the democrats have ever made

So it was fine not to have that question for the last 70 years of census taking, but all of a sudden now it's "pathetic" to point out the GOPs obvious political motivations for doing this

 

[Mantis Toboggan M.D.]

@ this juelzing...

We are talking about people that are living in the country illegally having representation in congress...There is no LOGICAL reason for that...

Stop juelzing and keep it on subject...

Your not a US citizen, you don't count...PERIOD

If you’re subject to a nations laws and contribute to its economy, you should have a representative voice in government.

 

[the cac mamba]

By counting them



So it was fine not to have that question for the last 70 years of census taking, but all of a sudden now it's "pathetic" to point out the GOPs obvious political motivations for doing this

do you see a conflict when the same party that wants to push medicare for all, feels that asking people taking the census whether theyre a citizen or not is too intrusive?

 

[the cac mamba]

If you’re subject to a nations laws and contribute to its economy, you should have a representative voice in government.

wrong, because you can't define 'contribute to its economy'. you're either a citizen or you're not

and please dont tell me you just brought up illegals being subject to the nations laws

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

and if that illegal workforce were to suddenly cease to exist,

"if an impossible thing magically happened" is not a good basis for an argument

in fact, that specific thing is a pretty good counterargument

if the underground, underpaid, under-the-table workforce instantly vanished, america's economy would shyt the bed immediately

they'd be jumping from the highest windows on wall street

Wilber Charlton Westerham the Third would be forced to sell one of his yachts and possibly skip his annual ski trip to the Alps this year

 

[the cac mamba]

"if an impossible thing magically happened" is not a good basis for an argument

if it's good enough for jesus, it's good enough for me

 

[GnauzBookOfRhymes]

you mean the constitution that was written in the 1700s by rich white landowners who thought only other rich white landowners should be able to vote and hold office, and didnt consider blacks to be human beings? the constitution we've had to amend several times as we've progressed because...the country has changed?

that constitution?

Yes. And if you want the census to only count the number of citizens, feel free to fight for the constitutional amendment

 

[GnauzBookOfRhymes]

i have to again at the constitution being brought up

it's fine to toss it aside, because the founding fathers could have never conceived of the electoral college becoming so unbalanced because of population. but lets bring it back up again when the narrative has to shift to catering to people who came here illegally

What are you talking about? You’re literally making zero sense. You’re being sloppy. You’re flailing. It’s embarrassing.

BTW, election law is largely governed by the states (remember that thing you guys like so much). They have the power to decide how to manage their elections, apportion delegates etc subject to federal laws regulating voting rights etc.

 

[You Win Perfect]

You’re still not getting it. Do better.

You’re an adult right?

he does get it he's just being white supremacist. why are you going back and forth