Breaking: Tory Lanez shooting video to be released in 36 hours, Congresswoman Paulina Luna says. Edit: Ring camera footage dropping today!!

[MicIsGod]

I like Olayemi Olurin but she crashed out over trans issues...

No different than hard red pillers. As soon as a nikka is accused he’s guilty and scum of the earth. Ddg even being in that thumbnail with DIDDY

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Femcel babble. Nobody likes these mfs

A lot of people like and defend these dudes and other pieces of shyt like them.

 

[tuckgod]

I don't understand what MAGA has to do with a Black Man being innocent or guilty. Why is this even part of the discussion

But where's the ring footage and I hope it's not the gun shots video cause that's not helping his case.

Thats how warped these nikkas minds have become

 

[MicIsGod]

A lot of people like and defend these dudes and other pieces of shyt like them.

True. But If you question and don’t believe 100% of what every woman says about someone you get labeled and lumped in with people who think diddy is innocent Femcel babble.

 

[Westbama Heartthrob]

True. But If you question and don’t believe 100% of what every woman says about someone you get labeled and lumped in with people who think diddy is innocent Femcel babble.

Dog you in here all week trying to run interference for Tory lanez. Yet still have nothing to show he didn't shoot Megan

 

[MeachTheMonster]

I don't understand what MAGA has to do with a Black Man being innocent or guilty. Why is this even part of the discussion

But where's the ring footage and I hope it's not the gun shots video cause that's not helping his case.

MAGA told you there was a video to anticipate.

Now you ask yourself why they would create those expectations knowing no video exists

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

True. But If you question and don’t believe 100% of what every woman says about someone you get labeled and lumped in with people who think diddy is innocent Femcel babble.

I think that's a bit disingenuous. It's not about believing 100% of what anyone says without question, it's about patterns. A lot of people who say they're "just asking questions" or "waiting for more info" end up only questioning the victim and giving the accused the benefit of the doubt. That doesn't come off as neutral, it comes off like they've already picked a side, just without saying it directly.

 

[MicIsGod]

I think that's a bit disingenuous. It's not about believing 100% of what anyone says without question, it's about patterns. A lot of people who say they're "just asking questions" or "waiting for more info" end up only questioning the victim and giving the accused the benefit of the doubt. That doesn't come off as neutral, it comes off like they've already picked a side, just without saying it directly.

That’s a lot of assuming. People are free to question shyt they don’t believe that genuinely seems shaky. It’s difference between that and questioning r Kelly and diddy. It’s how people get labels for shyt they didn’t do. We have no idea if ddg is guilty or not just a woman’s accusations. Tory’s case has plenty of stuff that is worth questioning, and why it always has been questioned.

 

[MicIsGod]

Dog you in here all week trying to run interference for Tory lanez. Yet still have nothing to show he didn't shoot Megan

I don’t care about Tory lanez. I care about Megan being a rotten woman who lied for sympathy. You have no objectivity and dance around any opposing point or fact. Stop crying and go back to hearing imaginary words in ring audio.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

That’s a lot of assuming. People are free to question shyt they don’t believe that genuinely seems shaky. It’s difference between that and questioning r Kelly and diddy. It’s how people get labels for shyt they didn’t do. We have no idea if ddg is guilty or not just a woman’s accusations. Tory’s case has plenty of stuff that is worth questioning, and why it always has been questioned.

People can question things, sure, but when someone *only* questions the accuser and downplays patterns or hard evidence, that's not neutrality. That's a bias, whether it's intentional or not.

With that DDG dude, it's not just one woman, there was an accusation from someone else too (Rubi Rose). And with Tory Lanez, there's literally audio of him admitting to what he was accused of. Acting like there's just "stuff worth questioning" while brushing that aside isn't some principled skepticism. It's selective doubt that always seems to benefit the accused.

Folks get labeled not for asking questions, but for consistently using "questions" as a shield to protect people accused of abuse while disregarding the victims and the evidence.

 

[Westbama Heartthrob]

I think that's a bit disingenuous. It's not about believing 100% of what anyone says without question, it's about patterns. A lot of people who say they're "just asking questions" or "waiting for more info" end up only questioning the victim and giving the accused the benefit of the doubt. That doesn't come off as neutral, it comes off like they've already picked a side, just without saying it directly.

Exhibit A

I don’t care about Tory lanez. I care about Megan being a rotten woman who lied for sympathy. You have no objectivity and dance around any opposing point or fact. Stop crying and go back to hearing imaginary words in ring audio.

 

[Sad Bunny]

Seriously… where is it?


LIke no shade…. Everyone knows I got love for my homey @Sad Bunny

But niccas got neg trains for less


we gonna gonna give an extension out to Tuesday since this a holiday weekend…. but something needs to be done next week

It’s in this thread. It was ring camera footage.

You can even hear him say “dance bytch” in the video lmao

 

[MicIsGod]

People can question things, sure, but when someone *only* questions the accuser and downplays patterns or hard evidence, that's not neutrality. That's a bias, whether it's intentional or not.

With that DDG dude, it's not just one woman, there was an accusation from someone else too (Rubi Rose). And with Tory Lanez, there's literally audio of him admitting to what he was accused of. Acting like there's just "stuff worth questioning" while brushing that aside isn't some principled skepticism. It's selective doubt that always seems to benefit the accused.

Folks get labeled not for asking questions, but for consistently using "questions" as a shield to protect people accused of abuse while disregarding the victims and the evidence.

Rubi rose beat ddg and several people have said the Hallie chick put hands on him in front of them. That’s enough for me to not make a judgement on either of them as it’s a toxic relationship.

Tory lanez has no dna on a magazine and 2 women confirmed lying under oath omitting their physical fight. Tory said what he was really apologizing for on the phone and you are choosing to not believe him, which is fine. I’m not labeling you a “feminist” for thinking he’s guilty. Hell, I think he is too. But calling everyone else “abuser defenders” for calling out blatant lies and omissions is disingenuous. Meg has lied and it can be called out.

 

[MicIsGod]

Exhibit A

Femcel babble.

 

[Bryan Danielson]

It’s in this thread. It was ring camera footage.

You can even hear him say “dance bytch” in the video lmao

what page?


I got 45 pages and we ain’t got time for all dat

Can this be posted on the top thread?