BREAKING: Undercover Investigation Exposes Plot to Disrupt Trump Inauguration

[newworldafro]

Wow
When I first joined I just assumed this was a majority black board
The daily threads from Trump supporters makes a lot more sense
Edit: This shyt reddit-lite

It's not about Trump Supporters or Obama Lovers or Hillary Stans or Bernie Cusaders....it's about objectivity. Step away from partisanship and worshipping people..that happen to be politicians. Call them out when they goof up or do fukkboi policy shiit, and praise them when they are doing something good.

Of course, good and bad can be subjective when emotions get involved...and that's when folks ignore being sensible, practical, and objective.

I went to BHO's inauguration in 2009 . I was excited. 8 years later, I think a good percentage of his policies were just as deceptively fukkboi-ish as 8 years of Dubya.

Objectivity is the name of the game. Stop putting your subjective emotions into flesh and blood politicians. Their policies are the only thing that matter. Everything else is gossipy chatty patty

 

[HellRell804]

It's not about Trump Supporters or Obama Lovers or Hillary Stans or Bernie Cusaders....it's about objectivity. Step away from partisanship and worshipping people..that happen to be politicians. Call them out when they goof up or do fukkboi policy shiit, and praise them when they are doing something good.

Of course, good and bad can be subjective when emotions get involved...and that's when folks ignore being sensible, practical, and objective.

I went to BHO's inauguration in 2009 . I was excited. 8 years later, I think a good percentage of his policies were just as deceptively fukkboi-ish as 8 years of Dubya.

Objectivity is the name of the game. Stop putting your subjective emotions into flesh and blood politicians. Their policies are the only thing that matter. Everything else is gossipy chatty patty

1:25
"Black people have been taught to use their emotions to solve problems. If you run into a problem just start screaming and yelling and hope it all works out. if you get lost on the highway, just close your eyes and mash on the gas. Don't use your brain, you were given a brain but don't use it, that's for white supremacists. Just keep moving, be a body people. And when you're moving, if you bump into another black person, lash out at them. That way we can easily control you"

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Vid didn't expose anything. Project veritas may have been doing an investigation to see if the left would take money for inciting riots. There's a reason this "expose" got no media coverage.

You're hopeless and so far gone that it's a waste of time to attempt to address you in any reasonable way.

Objectivity is the name of the game. Stop putting your subjective emotions into flesh and blood politicians.

nikka, you're not objective. You stay sourcing alt-right "news."

Or you could just listen to A. Jones, Mike Rivero, Jeff Rense radio shows.

Here's you suggesting people listen to 3 noted white supremacists.

And you regularly source gatewaypundit. And Jim Hoft is a racist.

 

[wickedsm]

You're hopeless and so far gone that it's a waste of time to attempt to address you in any reasonable way.


nikka, you're not objective. You stay sourcing alt-right "news."



Here's you suggesting people listen to 3 noted white supremacists.

And you regularly source gatewaypundit. And Jim Hoft is a racist.

jim hoft is often referred to as SMOTI for very valid reasons.

what actual black person has the nerve to link or even believe a fukking word out of that trash's mouth

Jim smoti Hoft is the originator of the Darren Wilson super broken orbital socket trash in the murder of Mike Brown.

all of these alt righters are racist and prove it every single day.

but but "oh look at me! i have "alternative sources"

cacs or fukking agents or both to quote or recommend alex jones or breitbart or gateway pundit or project veritas

 

[newworldafro]

O'keefe and PV have been found to deceptively edit videos numerous times in the past, yet you take them at face value. Did you watch the sting operation carried out to exposed them?

Project Veritas has exposed alot of fukkery in the DNC and Planned Parenthood, so objectively speaking you can't take away from those investigations. When did undercover journalism get a bad name. I remember as a kid watching PrimeTime Live, 20/20, and Dateline NBC, when they would do undercover investigations on all types of groups and people. They would advertise it like it was a drama. So undercover reporting is nothing new.

Specifically, about this video, it's on the fence...offering money to do stuff is on the fence shady, maybe criminal. So yeah, that's probably not a good look.

You see what I just did. I was mature enough to hold steadfast on a particular entities' virtues, but also say something else they did has questionable integrity. You see that. That's called being an Objective Thinker. We should apply that to all political parties, politicians, and news sites. Don't be so anti-something, that you can't admit when you agree with something that same entity has said or done.

 

[Biscayne]

The media makes the narrative. If they were riding for trump most of that would have been swept under the rug.

Bill Clinton was a womanizing sleazebag who had numerous stories about his dealings with prostitutes around the Arkansas area, including having an illegitimate child by one. But did you hear about any of that? Nope not until he and his wife were in the political fight of their lives with whitewater did the news of him getting sloppy toppy from the chubby intern hit the scene and redirected us from the more serious charges.

George W. Bush was a cocaine addicted party boy who coasted for most of his life doing nothing until his late 30s early 40s. There was even a story about male prostitutes frequenting the white house that was promptly buried. The media took a Connecticut born trust fund baby and turned him into a gun slinging cowboy.

Obama's rise to the top was so fast if you blinked you would miss it. Got elected to the senate in 05, president by 08. There were rumors that he frequented gay bath houses, that his church encouraged gay members to get married to women for appearances, the Donald Young murder/ coverup. And his past drug use was scrubbed. Nothing about the cocaine use he admitted to, just that cool ass pic of him smoking a j.

And those are just the presidents I can remember from my lifetime.

Eh, we know most politicians have stuff in their closets, and controversy spread about. I'm not defending previous presidents. My question is, what is it about Trump in relation to the Washington establishment, that you guys feel The Media would need to sabotage Trump?

Fox News is mainstream media. They too control and dictate the thoughts of millions of Americans on one side of the aisle. Benghazi and other controversies surrounding Clinton have been floated out there for years by Fox News and other outlets for years. We can nitpick who The Media is for or against, but whoever the media favors is up for interpretation, and which ever side of the aisle you're on, you're gonna see it one way. This is established. I get that.

But that doesn't necessarily pinpoint what it is about Trump's policies, that make him a threat to the establishment. The very same establishment that he's apart of. His cabinet made up of The Establishment. Trump and his supporters painting The Media as frauds and fake, solely for the fact that they bring Trump's biggest controversies to the forefront, is all apart of "The Game".

 

[Cryptocurrency Scarface]

I wanna see trump catch a pie in the face...

an acid pie

 

[newworldafro]

You're hopeless and so far gone that it's a waste of time to attempt to address you in any reasonable way.


nikka, you're not objective. You stay sourcing alt-right "news."



Here's you suggesting people listen to 3 noted white supremacists.

And you regularly source gatewaypundit. And Jim Hoft is a racist.

Yeah. I listen to Mike Rivero, Jeff Rense, and Alex Jones. I have for years. I have to clarify as I always do....that I don't agree with all their opinions...and I can't because they don't agree with each other on some key points either.

I don't source Gateway Pundit like that, and I don't know who Jimmy Hoft is. So there's that.

I also listen to Tariq Nasheed, Dr.Boyce Watkins, and Umar Johnson......guess what?!!?...I don't agree with everything they say either, nor do they with each other.

So have you exposed me. Absolutely. But not really, cause I've said it in dozens of posts You found out I'm an Objective Thinker, and idealogically/intellectually try to be mature about sources of information. In other words, I don't throw the baby out with the bath water.

 

[Biscayne]

Just because Fox News(mainstream media giant) was anti Clinton and talked about Benghazi and Emails ad nauseum for years, does that make Hillary Clinton some threat to the establishment?



Whether we like it or not, Trump is gonna get inaugurated. Any real threat wouldn't have made it past the primaries....

 

[b_low_brown]

Just because Fox News(mainstream media giant) was anti Clinton and talked about Benghazi and Emails ad nauseum for years, does that make Hillary Clinton some threat to the establishment?

Fox News doesn't represent the establishment.

The multitude of left leaning media organizations + the intelligence community, however, do.

 

[Absalom's Thought]

.

 

[wickedsm]

Project Veritas has exposed alot of fukkery in the DNC and Planned Parenthood, so objectively speaking you can't take away from those investigations. When did undercover journalism get a bad name. I remember as a kid watching PrimeTime Live, 20/20, and Dateline NBC, when they would do undercover investigations on all types of groups and people. They would advertise it like it was a drama. So undercover reporting is nothing new.

Specifically, about this video, it's on the fence...offering money to do stuff is on the fence shady, maybe criminal. So yeah, that's probably not a good look.

You what I just did. I was mature enough to hold steadfast on a particular entities' virtues, but also say something else they did has questionable integrity. You see that. That's called being an Objective Thinker. We should apply that to all political parties, politicians, and news sites. Don't be so anti-something, that you can't admit when you agree with something that same entity has said or done.

theres a major difference between "undercover reporting" and selectively and deceptively editing to completely change the narrative.
surely you as such a mature person can understand that.

Project Veritas' Election 2016 'Rigging' Videos

the blaze- yes that the blaze on project veritas and its bullshyt as relates to npr

Does Raw Video of NPR Expose Reveal Questionable Editing & Tactics?

And that is only on the issue of going undercover. But even if you are of the opinion, as I am, that undercover reporting is acceptable and ethical in very defined situations, it is another thing to approve of editing tactics that seem designed to intentionally lie or mislead about the material being presented.

 

[HellRell804]

Eh, we know most politicians have stuff in their closets, and controversy spread about. I'm not defending previous presidents. My question is, what is it about Trump, that you guys feel The Media is on some skeaky Trump sabotage?

Fox News is mainstream media. They too control and dictates the thoughts of millions of Americans on The Right. Benghazi and other controversies surrounding Clinton have been floated out there for years, before Trump decided to run. We can nitpick who The Media is for or against, but whoever the media favors is up for interpretation, and which ever side of the aisle you're on, you're gonna see it one way. This is established. I get that.

But that doesn't necessarily pinpoint what it is about Trump's policies, that make him a threat to the establishment. The very same establishment that he's apart of. His cabinet made up of The Establishment. Trump and his supporters painting The Media as frauds and fake, solely for the fact that they bring Trump's biggest controversies to the forefront, is all apart of "The Game".

Well for one, I've never heard a mainstream politician comment on the trade deals and how they negatively affected american workers. Politicians who hold that view are usually relegated to 3rd party or conspiracy theory status.

2, whether he goes through it or not, he campaigned on the promise that he would try to institute term limits for congress. This would make it infinitely more expensive if corporations had to buy/ blackmail a new crop of people every 4-8 years.

3, in his almost 50 years as a public face the media just turned against him when he ran for president. They threw plenty of allegations at him and none stuck. Before that, he hosted wrestlemanias, made cameos in children's movies like home alone, and even had the number one TV show in america for a few years. He only became universally despied when the media said so.

He, allegedly, paid for his own campaign. So if he was in the public eye that long scandal free and doesn't have corporate money backing him, that means he can't be controlled. Even if the piss video was real it wouldn't hurt that much as most of his mostly white fan base is probably into shyt like that.

But I could be wrong, I'll continue to look at the whole picture.

On a side note, the way they tried to pin this on Russia, and Obama stepping in on his last days to issue sanctions, and trying to provoke a conflict on his way out has me almost convinced Hilary was supposed to win to start WW3

 

[Jack Trippa 3z company ho]

Depends on which candidate you thought was more evil/corrupt. If anything, your post is exactly what @HellRell804 was talking about. He's the one who said folks were rooting for the FBI and CIA. I said, so was Trump...

It's because we knew what was in the emails. Any decent person should have been...Hillary talking about sacrificing chickens to Molech, Podesta and the pedo code words appearing 100's of times. Some vile shyt, that's just the tip of the iceberg.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Project Veritas has exposed alot of fukkery in the DNC and Planned Parenthood, so objectively speaking you can't take away from those investigations. When did undercover journalism get a bad name. I remember as a kid watching PrimeTime Live, 20/20, and Dateline NBC, when they would do undercover investigations on all types of groups and people. They would advertise it like it was a drama. So undercover reporting is nothing new.

Specifically, about this video, it's on the fence...offering money to do stuff is on the fence shady, maybe criminal. So yeah, that's probably not a good look.

You what I just did. I was mature enough to hold steadfast on a particular entities' virtues, but also say something else they did has questionable integrity. You see that. That's called being an Objective Thinker. We should apply that to all political parties, politicians, and news sites. Don't be so anti-something, that you can't admit when you agree with something that same entity has said or done.

How can you be this dishonest? They didn't expose anything. Those PP videos were proven to have been doctored. And they refused to show the unedited footage from those DNC videos, which cast doubt on their veracity, given their history of producing bullshyt. And stop trying to conflate legit journalism with that sleazy, tabloid-style trash O'keefe and Veritas produces. Your last point is just laughable, sanctimonious bullshyt. You're not some beacon of objectivity. You're not an objective thinker. You're a bullshyt artist.



"James Edward O'Keefe III (born June 28, 1984) is an American conservative political activist. He has produced secretly recorded undercover audio and video encounters, always selectively edited to misrepresent actual events, with figures and workers in academic, governmental and social service organizations, presenting his videos in ways that appears to be abusive or alleged illegal behavior by representatives of those organizations. He gained national attention for his release of video recordings of workers at ACORN offices in 2009, his arrest in early 2010 at the office of then-U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) in a failed attempt to record staff conversations, and the release of videos of conversations with two high-ranking, now former, NPR executives in 2011.

Due to his videos of ACORN workers allegedly aiding a couple in criminal planning, the U.S. Congress voted to freeze funds for the non-profit. The national scandal resulted in the non-profit also losing most private funding before investigations were completed. In March 2010, ACORN was close to bankruptcy and had to close most of its offices. Shortly after, the California State Attorney General's Office and the US Government Accountability Office released their related investigative reports. The Attorney General's Office found that O'Keefe had misrepresented the actions of ACORN workers and that the workers had not committed illegal actions. A preliminary probe by the GAO found that ACORN had managed its federal funds appropriately.

By selectively editing videos to match right-wing confirmation biases, O'Keefe gained support from conservative media and interest groups. In 2009, the late Andrew Breitbart commissioned the activist (then 25 years old), for the option to publish new videos exclusively on BigGovernment.com. In June 2010, O'Keefe formed a 501(c)(3) organization, Project Veritas, with the stated mission to "investigate and expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud and other misconduct."

O'Keefe pled guilty in 2010 to one misdemeanor count of entering a federal building under false pretenses."

James O’Keefe Pays $100K Settlement after Deceiving Public about ACORN (and ALEC Helped Take Down ACORN)
https://thinkprogress.org/conservat...0-settlement-for-acorn-pimp-sting-a2364de45cd
James O'Keefe Pays $100,000 To ACORN Employee He Smeared-Conservative Media Yawns
What the Planned Parenthood hoax really proves: Right-wing extremists have no qualms about destroying peoples’ lives
No, Planned Parenthood Is Not Selling Aborted Fetal Body Parts