But what's the point of debating these a$$holes if they're ultimately not going to or open to change especially if their income depends on their stance? I've seen people like this constantly challenged on social media and proven wrong, but nothing changes. They don't become enlightened, their follower count doesn't decrease, absolutely nothing. People like Spencer and Lahren have been humiliated on national platforms, but they still remain the same hateful idiots who still get a lot of support.cant debate em, flag em
Brehs and Brehettes, Can the Coli come Together to Remove a Dangerous Racist Youtuber? (Free Reps)
- Thread starter HopeKillCure
- Start date
-
- Tags
- free daps and reps
HopeKillCure
Banned
Bump
Black Nate Grey
The God Emperor of Mankind
Would smash with the vengeful force of a 100 shotgun rounds to the chest from Huey P. Newton.
She's a tranny fam
MalikX
Superstar
When did blacks become the face of the migrant crisis. I could've sworn most of the migrants were from Syria. How did Africans become the boogey man.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Several hundreds thousands of mostly black Africans have crossed into Italy in the last year.
I'm not here to tell yall what to do, only offer food for thought, but the ravenous is to strong...sooo anyway
I know it's not popular, but I'm more about hard Critical Objective Thoughts over what's popular, and besides I've said the following literally since I"ve been on this site and have been proven 100% right.........
This rush to censorship feeds on itself and mestasizes like cancer until......if youtube is the host then it is IMHO, for multiple reasons eating itself alive, making the youtube experience less intriguing for all users.
First thing, yes youtube is owned by Google which is owned by Alphabet, and if they want a particular policy for their business interests then, outside of a law or lawsuit that shows a particular behavior as being illegal, they can do what they want. This more importantly makes the case why these large monopolies are the worst and we have been suckered in and got comfortable by the "free meal", to the point that now a lot of amazing material may be lost....instead of creating and putting information on multiple video platforms.
At this rate, youtube is turning into a less interesting place, where they will either purge all controversial pundits, make it more difficult to find controversial pundits, and ultimately make it one big Happy Safe Space. A Happy Disneyland-like Safe Space ...which is personally
to me.Put it this way....12 years ago youtube didn't exist.....so easily accessible video generated content was not easy or convenient to find in one place if at all. 12 years later, quite literally every topic on earth has a place in this "video library"....that shiit is unheralded, unprecedented, and unfathomable before 2005. That Normalcy Bias is a Motherfuucker, as this manifestation is a blip on the screen of human history, but we feel like it's always been there....and for most on this site, we are still around twice as old if not much more older as youtube.
So all that extraneous wordplay is to say we are loosing the potentcy of this privately held product when it's owners demonetize videos, go out and get the ADL/Other Super User Organizations to say this person/topic should be flagged, purged or have decreased search results for controversial pundits/topics, then we as the user also go into this franticness and flag every video we don't like.....the the purge happening on youtube is like the the Purge series.
Yeah, this tranny white individual has been flagged and purged....but so has Tariq Nasheed, so has Boyce Watkins, so has Cynthia G...so has other black pundits that I'm sure most on this particular thread have some level of respect for....so for what it's worth, understand the "digital book burning" on youtube, in other countries like The Great Chinese Firewall or by the European Union is only taking the beauty of free expression and pigeon holing any and all controversial perspectives, but especially those that those of influence don't like and pushing them away from the people.
Here's the real kicker right....many of yall are stuck on race controversy, but eventually it will be "controversial topics" like GMOs, vaccines, environmental issues, more and more non-race issues that will be pigeonholed or purged. This again just reiterates the need for more user generated video sites, to escape this Empirical Force......remember when Google's motto was literally "Do No Evil".
I personally don't like the censorship/purging and think it's more harmful than good, because it eventually eats up all controversial thought...including those controversial perspectives you agree with......., but that's just my Critically Objective Controversial Opinion
Last edited:
Theodoresolderbreh
No Shorts No Malarkey
done. fukk that bytch and anybody standing next to her
BlackStarLine
Pro
Flagged
BlackPrint
The Mayor
Several hundreds thousands of mostly black Africans have crossed into Italy in the last year.
I'm not here to tell yall what to do, only offer food for thought, but the ravenous is to strong...sooo anyway
I know it's not popular, but I'm more about hard Critical Objective Thoughts over what's popular, and besides I've said the following literally since I"ve been on this site and have been proven 100% right.........
This rush to censorship feeds on itself and mestasizes like cancer until......if youtube is the host then it is IMHO, for multiple reasons eating itself alive, making the youtube experience less intriguing for all users.
First thing, yes youtube is owned by Google which is owned by Alphabet, and if they want a particular policy for their business interests then, outside of a law or lawsuit that shows a particular behavior as being illegal, they can do what they want. This more importantly makes the case why these large monopolies are the worst and we have been suckered in and got comfortable by the "free meal", to the point that now a lot of amazing material may be lost....instead of creating and putting information on multiple video platforms.
At this rate, youtube is turning into a less interesting place, where they will either purge all controversial pundits, make it more difficult to find controversial pundits, and ultimately make it one big Happy Safe Space. A Happy Disneyland-like Safe Space ...which is personally
Put it this way....12 years ago youtube didn't exist.....so easily accessible video generated content was not easy or convenient to find in one place if at all. 12 years later, quite literally every topic on earth has a place in this "video library"....that shiit is unheralded, unprecedented, and unfathomable before 2005. That Normalcy Bias is a Motherfuucker, as this manifestation is a blip on the screen of human history, but we feel like it's always been there....and for most on this site, we are still around twice as old if not much more older as youtube.
So all that extraneous wordplay is to say we are loosing the potentcy of this privately held product when it's owners demonetize videos, go out and get the ADL/Other Super User Organizations to say this person/topic should be flagged, purged or have decreased search results for controversial pundits/topics, then we as the user also go into this franticness and flag every video we don't like.....the the purge happening on youtube is like the the Purge series.
Yeah, this tranny white individual has been flagged and purged....but so has Tariq Nasheed, so has Boyce Watkins, so has Cynthia G...so has other black pundits that I'm sure most on this particular thread have some level of respect for....so for what it's worth, understand the "digital book burning" on youtube, in other countries like The Great Chinese Firewall or by the European Union is only taking the beauty of free expression and pigeon holing any and all controversial perspectives, but especially those that those of influence don't like and pushing them away from the people.
Here's the real kicker right....many of yall are stuck on race controversy, but eventually it will be "controversial topics" like GMOs, vaccines, environmental issues, more and more non-race issues that will be pigeonholed or purged. This again just reiterates the need for more user generated video sites, to escape this Empirical Force......remember when Google's motto was literally "Do No Evil".
I personally don't like the censorship/purging and think it's more harmful than good, because it eventually eats up all controversial thought...including those controversial perspectives you agree with......., but that's just my Critically Objective Controversial Opinion
Disagree with you but 10\10 post. repped.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
BlackPrint
The Mayor
I don't think there needs to be a platform for everyone just for the sake of the Marketplace.. There's some discourse that has no place within organized society and really doesn't add to truth-seeking or spurring creative thought.. That's what needs to be censored. Anything that creates malevolent thought tracks, that can lead to violence and uproot social cohesion ( I really think this chick\dude fits into that.) should be 'burned', so to speak.What part don't you agree with breh??
Would smash with the vengeful force of a 100 shotgun rounds to the chest from Huey P. Newton.
HopeKillCure
Banned
Several hundreds thousands of mostly black Africans have crossed into Italy in the last year.
I'm not here to tell yall what to do, only offer food for thought, but the ravenous is to strong...sooo anyway
I know it's not popular, but I'm more about hard Critical Objective Thoughts over what's popular, and besides I've said the following literally since I"ve been on this site and have been proven 100% right.........
This rush to censorship feeds on itself and mestasizes like cancer until......if youtube is the host then it is IMHO, for multiple reasons eating itself alive, making the youtube experience less intriguing for all users.
First thing, yes youtube is owned by Google which is owned by Alphabet, and if they want a particular policy for their business interests then, outside of a law or lawsuit that shows a particular behavior as being illegal, they can do what they want. This more importantly makes the case why these large monopolies are the worst and we have been suckered in and got comfortable by the "free meal", to the point that now a lot of amazing material may be lost....instead of creating and putting information on multiple video platforms.
At this rate, youtube is turning into a less interesting place, where they will either purge all controversial pundits, make it more difficult to find controversial pundits, and ultimately make it one big Happy Safe Space. A Happy Disneyland-like Safe Space ...which is personally
Put it this way....12 years ago youtube didn't exist.....so easily accessible video generated content was not easy or convenient to find in one place if at all. 12 years later, quite literally every topic on earth has a place in this "video library"....that shiit is unheralded, unprecedented, and unfathomable before 2005. That Normalcy Bias is a Motherfuucker, as this manifestation is a blip on the screen of human history, but we feel like it's always been there....and for most on this site, we are still around twice as old if not much more older as youtube.
So all that extraneous wordplay is to say we are loosing the potentcy of this privately held product when it's owners demonetize videos, go out and get the ADL/Other Super User Organizations to say this person/topic should be flagged, purged or have decreased search results for controversial pundits/topics, then we as the user also go into this franticness and flag every video we don't like.....the the purge happening on youtube is like the the Purge series.
Yeah, this tranny white individual has been flagged and purged....but so has Tariq Nasheed, so has Boyce Watkins, so has Cynthia G...so has other black pundits that I'm sure most on this particular thread have some level of respect for....so for what it's worth, understand the "digital book burning" on youtube, in other countries like The Great Chinese Firewall or by the European Union is only taking the beauty of free expression and pigeon holing any and all controversial perspectives, but especially those that those of influence don't like and pushing them away from the people.
Here's the real kicker right....many of yall are stuck on race controversy, but eventually it will be "controversial topics" like GMOs, vaccines, environmental issues, more and more non-race issues that will be pigeonholed or purged. This again just reiterates the need for more user generated video sites, to escape this Empirical Force......remember when Google's motto was literally "Do No Evil".
I personally don't like the censorship/purging and think it's more harmful than good, because it eventually eats up all controversial thought...including those controversial perspectives you agree with......., but that's just my Critically Objective Controversial Opinion
We are always trying to win some moral/ higher thought war with savages.
The black collective needs balance. It's not all about higher learning and enlightenment, some of us have to be grunts and goons.
I'm not trying to have a debate with anyone who is going to punch me in the mouth when they realize that I'm right and their wrong. I have to meet them on their level, slap them around, and then rub it in later with the truth that my information is also correct.
Nobody likes censorship. People want to be entertained and everyone likes interesting. I'll choose survival over censorship any day. I can love freedom, but I'm not going to allow everything to be free, im not an animal. I have the ability to look at things as more than just all or nothing. I can pick good freedom and bad freedom. Freedom to have sex with children is a problem for me, but freedom wear whatever hairstyle you want is not a problem for me. My aggression towards 1 freedom and not the other freedom does not make me anti-freedom.
Censorship is the same. Videos and people like this put me and my family and other black people under attack. My survival instinct is to violently or verbally or systematically censor this without hesitation. It doesn't make me anti-free speech, it makes me a person with common sense.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
I just can't dig it man......not because I agree with a particular perspective, but someone/an entity of influence will use that exact same logic/stance you just described to censor a pundit you like. It's happening right now...I love hearing Boyce, Tariq, other unapolegtically black pundits just freely speak and have evidence to back them or none at all. I don't always agree with them 100% of the time, but I never want to see them censored, but there are some people that think the same way you and many others think about this tranny white supremacist, and it is leading to this whirlpool of censorship.
The 1st Amendment is the border between tyranny and freedom....read the book 1984 and peep the term called "newspeak".
The book Fahrenheit 451 has a similar takeon censoring of speech.
Again, I know Youtube is a private company and that ends the discussion. Yet, people can't get upset when private company censorship whips around and takes out someone they like.
Then when you toss in this whole Net Neutrality deal in the mix, making it difficult for small websites to have a presence on the web....it's not looking good.
Last edited:
