Brehs Andrew Gillum might lose! Go vote now!

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
20,384
Reputation
5,299
Daps
87,895
Reppin
The Arsenal


This is bullshyt

i dunno. i don't dismiss them out of hand. they got 2016 right. they seem to have their finger on the pulse of the white america that doesn't want to come out to these other pollsters that they support these vile people, but will do so in the ballot box. maybe trafalgar knows how to coax it out of them for their polling.

if they're right i'm taking the rest of the week off so i'm not in close contact with white people.
 
Last edited:

DonKnock

KPJ Gonna Save Us
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
27,156
Reputation
7,860
Daps
88,735
Reppin
Houston
This person is voting in Florida

DrRRHYHVAAI5Zgy.jpg:large
Future mass shooter right there, yea I said it:hubie:
 

NY's #1 Draft Pick

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,852
Reputation
6,680
Daps
100,786
Reppin
305
i dunno. i don't dismiss them out of hand. they got 2016 right. they seem to have their finger of the pulse of the white america that doesn't want to come out to these other pollsters that they support these vile people, but will do so in the ballot box. maybe trafalgar knows how to coax it out of them for their polling.

if they're right i'm taking the rest of the week off so i'm not in close contact with white people.
The just checked the actual report and they polled 60% white people mostly in their 50-60s. That’s prime trump supporters right there.:beli:
 

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
33,300
Reputation
6,295
Daps
112,426
:dahell: u aint learn shyt from the polls leading up to the 2016 election.
the 2016 polls were pretty much correct. Hillary was on average a few points ahead (within margin of error).

It's not like she had a commanding lead over trump before the election.
From the polls i saw, either Trump or Hillary could take it. So the polls weren't the issue.

Some moronic polls, based off no scientific info, did have her at 99% chance of winning. I think it was the NYT

But the scientific polls were pretty much spot on. That's how I remember it.
I never got the poll backlash from 2016 tbh.
 

gangreen

Top Notch
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
12,259
Reputation
2,756
Daps
30,472
Reppin
Brooklyn #byrdgang
the 2016 polls were pretty much correct. Hillary was on average a few points ahead (within margin of error).

It's not like she had a commanding lead over trump before the election.
From the polls i saw, either Trump or Hillary could take it. So the polls weren't the issue.

Some moronic polls, based off no scientific info, did have her at 99% chance of winning. I think it was the NYT

But the scientific polls were pretty much spot on. That's how I remember it.
I never got the poll backlash from 2016 tbh.

Nah breh, I recall those polls had Clinton comfortably ahead in Michigan, Minnesota and Pennsylvania. Like above 5 points.


Ohio Florida and Wisconsin were accurate but the polls in those above states were completely off.
 

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
33,300
Reputation
6,295
Daps
112,426
Nah breh, I recall those polls had Clinton comfortably ahead in Michigan, Minnesota and Pennsylvania. Like above 5 points.


Ohio Florida and Wisconsin were accurate but the polls in those above states were completely off.

ofc you gotta factor in the fact that Hillary can't campaign worth a damn

I think the Polls for Gillum will be more accurate cuz the nikka is ACTUALLY out here doing something, and not sitting on his ass

I guess I perceived the polls differently cuz I saw Hillary just sitting around, doing nothing. Meanwhile Trump was moving all over the place with rallies
 

wtfyomom

All Star
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
7,706
Reputation
-757
Daps
11,444
Reppin
NULL
the 2016 polls were pretty much correct. Hillary was on average a few points ahead (within margin of error).

It's not like she had a commanding lead over trump before the election.
From the polls i saw, either Trump or Hillary could take it. So the polls weren't the issue.

Some moronic polls, based off no scientific info, did have her at 99% chance of winning. I think it was the NYT

But the scientific polls were pretty much spot on. That's how I remember it.
I never got the poll backlash from 2016 tbh.
yeah I agree, its like every poll is considered meaningless when they actually were right, I think it was huff post that had her at 98 percent, thats why i dont pay attention to mainstream shyt, i remember TYT and most other independent leftists online said trump had a chance
 
Top