brehs if Curry wins another title this year, he will as many as lebron

[Jplaya2023]

This is why lebron going to LA w PG and kawhi

@ bronze lakers connection being the only hope to sink the GS ship...


Oh the confliction for these poor boys outchea

So the lakers gonna start three sf

 

[YaBoy]

Curry hasn't won a Finals MVP & if the Warriors win this year, he probably won't again. That shyt doesn't even sound right
Curry shouldnt be compared to Bron. & this is from a nikka that doesn't really fukk with Bron like that

 

[Inertia Creeps]

How many finals MVPs?

Kareem barely managed 2 for 6 rings total and some of y'all contrarian asses calling him GOAT over Jordan; Steph wins one this year and he'll have that same GOAT 1/3 ratio according to y'all

 

[KOBE]

The context was comparing players by titles you fukking jagaloon.

That's it.

That's not context ya dumb shyt. Context is when you talk about their roles in the championship, the reasons they lost, their teammates, the coaching, etc. That encompasses the context I was referring to. Now does Longley really fit into this conversation when you apply context to Curry and Lebron in terms of their contributions to championships? No? Then we're back at you looking like a jackass for bringing him up at all.

 

[Remote]

That's not context ya dumb shyt. Context is when you talk about their roles in the championship, the reasons they lost, their teammates, the coaching, etc. That encompasses the context I was referring to. Now does Longley really fit into this conversation when you apply context to Curry and Lebron in terms of their contributions to championships? No? Then we're back at you looking like a jackass for bringing him up at all.

That's not the way the thread was set up you twerp.



It was simply a comparison of titles.
The only one assuming these additional contextual parameters is you because of how good Curry is. But that's irrelevant to the OP as it was posted.
You Kobe stans are the fukking worst.

 

[KOBE]

That's not the way the thread was set up you twerp.



It was simply a comparison of titles.
The only one assuming these additional contextual parameters is you because of how good Curry is. But that's irrelevant to the OP as it was posted.
You Kobe stans are the fukking worst.

Actually the OP just made a thread to note an observation about how many titles Curry will have if he wins one this year and how many Lebron currently has. No other comparison was even made outside of that, any additional comparisons is you because of how good Curry is. Don't be pedantic with me.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Only jackass here is you since you can't put proper context of the roles the players being discussed played on their team. Curry aint Luc Longley, he's a superstar as is Lebron.

But he’s on a team...

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Actually the OP just made a thread to note an observation about how many titles Curry will have if he wins one this year and how many Lebron currently has. No other comparison was even made outside of that, any additional comparisons is you because of how good Curry is. Don't be pedantic with me.

But the thread was made to infer that Curry>Bron due to the same amount of titles in less trips... Let’s not not be obtuse for the sake of daps...

 

[Kaypain]

good for him

 

[THE MACHINE]

3 rings

 

[resistanze]

I love how you morons use titles with no context, then when titles with no context is used against your dumb arguments, you introduce context.

 

[Premeditated]

Only jackass here is you since you can't put proper context of the roles the players being discussed played on their team. Curry aint Luc Longley, he's a superstar as is Lebron.

Lethots use that same logic against Kobe in his threepeat days