Brehs on Child Support....I have a question.

[aqualung]

That money is tax free, for her, and she doesn't have to account for how any of it is spent.

That needs to change.

But she is stuck raising those 2 children. She has primary custody. Day in and day out she is feeding and clothing and guarding and teaching those children. SHE IS SADDLED WITH THEM. Would you carry that load for $450/child each month for the next 13 years? I doubt it. -_-

They are scribbling on the leather seats of that "new whip" with their crayons RIGHT NOW. Later, they will muddy vehicle's interior their with soccer cleats and demand fast food or pizza for dinner after soccer practice. Only 13 more years!

 

[aqualung]

...I always thought a woman asking for child support should not get custody of the kids since she is admitting that she can't financially support them...

If a woman has custody of zero kids, then she needs no child support. Anyone (man or woman) who is primary caregiver to small kids less time and energy to work a job and earn wages. If the father got primary custody of young cihldren, then he would HAVE TO either reduce his work hours or retain someone else to care for the young kids during his work hours...and he would be wise to demand child support from the mother.

You are an immature person if court-ordered child support would preempt your involvement in your own child's life.

 

[Neil Tyson]

It's less costly to just kill her and take the children yourself. If you have more income, and can reduce work hours to accommodate your children you absolutely should get the children. But obviously that's not the case because the courts is always on the mother's side even if she has to leech off the father.

 

[I'm Billy FUCO!!]

Jesus Christ @ this thread.

Virgins and gay dudes won.

 

[ejthompson23]

If a woman has custody of zero kids, then she needs no child support. Anyone (man or woman) who is primary caregiver to small kids less time and energy to work a job and earn wages. If the father got primary custody of young cihldren, then he would HAVE TO either reduce his work hours or retain someone else to care for the young kids during his work hours...and he would be wise to demand child support from the mother.

You are an immature person if court-ordered child support would preempt your involvement in your own child's life.

No you're wrong sadly...if a woman wants custody of her kids she had to prove that she can afford to feed n clothes them...why should I be paying for all the kids needs and only be reduced to having "visitation" times with them...and how would u know a man would have to stop or reduce his work? Me my self my mother is home everyday and I got 3 sisters with no kids so babysitting or anything else wouldn't be a problem...and there are daycare centers for those who dnt have these advantages...the problem is the state is telling black women that all the black men is good for is a check every month...just push out the kid and get paid...I couldn't lease a car if I cnt prove that financially I can afford it...no man with any self respect would ask child support frm the baby's mother since that would mean he's admitting that he cnt take care of his kids ..