Brehs, ya'll ever think...

Donald Trumps Twitter

Divine Infinite Commander King
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
14,554
Reputation
1,238
Daps
35,556
Reppin
Space Force 1
Scientist know a lot of shyt. But at the same time don't know shyt. So whether animals can think abstractly you can't give a definitive answer.

They take a lot of educated guesses, and believe in the most incredulous shyt from time periods they never witnessed.

Big Bang, evolution. :mjlol:

they can't even accurately tell you if a human has neck pain, You think they know what animals think or feel.

Sure you can study patterns and make up words, but cmon :skip:
 

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
42,219
Reputation
19,308
Daps
156,577
Reppin
Humanity
What if the bridge really fukked Gutta in the ass and threw him over the kid?



BxwgnpNIMAEb5q5.jpg


nice to see the kid get away this time.
 

Saiyajin

Superstar
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
10,081
Reputation
3,365
Daps
54,029
“Insight into how chimpanzees really think can be seen in some recent experiments performed by Dr. Povinelli. In these experiments, the researchers used the chimps’ natural begging gesture to examine how they really think about their world. They confronted the chimps with two familiar experimenters, one offering a piece of food and the other holding out an undesirable block of wood. As expected, the chimps had no trouble distinguishing between the block and the food and immediately gestured to the experimenter offering the food. Next, the researchers wanted to see if the chimps would be able to choose between a person who could see them and a person who could not. If the chimpanzees understood how other animals see, they would gesture only to the person who could see them. The researchers achieved the “seeing/not-seeing” contrast by having the two experimenters adopt different postures. In one test, one experimenter wore a blindfold over her eyes while the other wore a blindfold over her mouth. In the other tests, one of the experimenters wore a bucket over her head, placed her hands over her eyes or sat with her back turned to the chimpanzee. All these postures were modeled after the behaviors that had been observed during the chimpanzees’ spontaneous play. The results of the experiments were astonishing. In the tests involving blindfolds, buckets and hands over the eyes–the apes entered the lab and paused but then were just as likely to gesture to the person who could not see them as to the person who could. In several cases, the chimps gestured to the person who could not see them and then, when nothing happened, gestured again, as if puzzled by the fact that the experimenter did not respond. In the case of experimenters facing with their backs to the chimps, they performed as if they knew that those facing way from them could not see and offer them food. However, subsequent experiments proved that the chimps had merely responded to conditioning from the initial experiments, since they had only received food from those experimenters who faced them. This was proven by having experimenters facing away from the chimps, but then turning to look over their shoulders. The chimps were just as likely to gesture to the experimenters facing away as the one who turned to look at them. Chimpanzees have no clue that humans must face them in order to see. It seems obvious from these experiments that chimpanzees lack even a simple understanding of how their world works, but merely react to conditioning from directly observable events.

Other researchers have noted that chimpanzees do not understand the cause and effect of their actions. Apes will climb onto a box to reach fruit, but if the box is absent, will place on the ground beneath the fruit a sheet of paper and stand upon it.

A more recent study examined the ability of human infants and young chimpanzees to help human adults. 18-month-old human infants and young chimpanzees were presented with four categories of problems: out-of-reach objects, access thwarted by a physical obstacle, achieving a wrong (correctable) result, and using a wrong (correctable) means. While human infants could perform all four tasks, chimpanzees could only perform the first task. As in previous studies, chimpanzees were unable to discern when an individual failed at a simple task and how he could help. The researchers concluded:

A number of theorists have claimed that human beings cooperate with one another and help one another (especially non-kin) in ways not found in other animal species. This is almost certainly so, and the current results demonstrate that even very young children have a natural tendency to help other persons solve their problems, even when if the other is a stranger and they receive no benefit at all.” Warneken, F., and M. Tomasello. 2006. Altruistic Helping in Human Infants and Young Chimpanzees. Science 311: 1301-1303.”

Humans versus Animals- abstract thinking studies | Explore WorldViews


these fukkin animals are dumb as shyt. all of them. chimpanzees are considered the smartest animal besides humans and these stupid fukks cant even understand the difference between a box and a piece of paper to grab something thats too high.

useless
 
Top