Alfred0Santana
I used to drop Lewinsky off at the White House.
:brondahell:
Brock has to legit be one of the goat finessers of all time
- Thread starter The G.O.D II
- Start date
:brondahell:
He can hit his suplexes and "draw" without squashing someone that u gotta use at the top. If no one is a threat to ever beat him, why sacrifice a top guy for?
Any evidence of that? Because sub numbers have been stagnant for years now. Hence the free months all the time
Art Barr
INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
00000000000000000000000000000022The funnny part is this company wasted two dream matches in two manias with Batista and ryback.
Plus, could have normalized Brock in WWE mythos by having ryback beat Brock for the whc.
When they sabotaged the punk hiac.
So, punk would not have a hiac in principal that matched up to the hhh and clique based or lead hell in a cells.
They will market as the company's marker for high drama via work.
So, anytime a non-clique based legacy performer could create a possible gimmick match that upstages a clique member submission.
It will be regulated like punk/ryback or even Daniel Bryan versus sheamus on the card with a clique based me at mania. That could threaten the workrate quality of a clique based production being upstaged via workrate.
Plus, this company should never have wasted the taker streak as well.
Including the fact since the promotion is scared of real workrate because the son-in-law gets exposed.
when, a wrasslin match becomes a wrasslin match in all of places a match takes place based around wrasslin, of all things.
So, Brock coming in was doomed to fail like the last time.
Since the promotion was based around the son-in-law's failed attempt to be flair and the horsemen.
the last time they tried to remake nitro on wwetv as raw.
This whole shyt is just a bad rerun and all strategically created to make the son-in-law look good and never be exposed.
As this company positions the son-in-law as the top all time promotional star via spreadsheet marketing and a company wide decision.
to make it about the McMahon legacy and not actually about wrasslin.
When people tune in to watch WWE to watch wrasslin not the mcmahons.
No, matter how many spreadsheets and marketing group response forms point to hhh's number to justify their direction.
Art Barr
Plus, could have normalized Brock in WWE mythos by having ryback beat Brock for the whc.
When they sabotaged the punk hiac.
So, punk would not have a hiac in principal that matched up to the hhh and clique based or lead hell in a cells.
They will market as the company's marker for high drama via work.
So, anytime a non-clique based legacy performer could create a possible gimmick match that upstages a clique member submission.
It will be regulated like punk/ryback or even Daniel Bryan versus sheamus on the card with a clique based me at mania. That could threaten the workrate quality of a clique based production being upstaged via workrate.
Plus, this company should never have wasted the taker streak as well.
Including the fact since the promotion is scared of real workrate because the son-in-law gets exposed.
when, a wrasslin match becomes a wrasslin match in all of places a match takes place based around wrasslin, of all things.
So, Brock coming in was doomed to fail like the last time.
Since the promotion was based around the son-in-law's failed attempt to be flair and the horsemen.
the last time they tried to remake nitro on wwetv as raw.
This whole shyt is just a bad rerun and all strategically created to make the son-in-law look good and never be exposed.
As this company positions the son-in-law as the top all time promotional star via spreadsheet marketing and a company wide decision.
to make it about the McMahon legacy and not actually about wrasslin.
When people tune in to watch WWE to watch wrasslin not the mcmahons.
No, matter how many spreadsheets and marketing group response forms point to hhh's number to justify their direction.
Art Barr
Last edited:
Sonny Corinthos
Superstar
People really still care about Randy Orton like this in 2016?
Still mad we never got Roman/Brock 2 y'all can't tell me that match wasn't some good shyt.
Brock bigger than the WWE except a few names Cena, Styles, etc only a couple guys can go in the ring with him and not look outta place.
Still mad we never got Roman/Brock 2 y'all can't tell me that match wasn't some good shyt.
Brock bigger than the WWE except a few names Cena, Styles, etc only a couple guys can go in the ring with him and not look outta place.
lol....the FIRST month is always free. Always has been.
And if you don't think Brock is a Network draw, you're wrong. To what degree he is is questionable, but he's a draw for sure
Exactly. I see people saying Brock is never gonna lose
makes me question how long they've watched wrestling. Brock will lose to their next guy.But the reason this Brock thing is getting problematic is because his matches have sucked for over a year and a half. And with all the controversy surrounding him coupled with the fact that he only shows up a few times a year, I can see why everyone is annoyed by his presence.
I like Brock, and I like his gimmick. He's a special attraction. He's their most unique talent and he brings something to WWE that no one else can. He shouldn't be losing to anyone like Orton or Reigns or Ambrose. That said, WWE has made zero attempt to realistically build someone up that might be able to beat him.