tonight was an anomaly, don't expect the same thing to happen in the Oracle Arena
parker had a better game tonight unquestionably, but overall it would be dumb to say he's better than steph in 2013
Curry is that nikka, but before he got hurt Parker was a top 5 MVP candidate.
Top 5? Spurs had the best record in the NBA before he got hurt, would have been MVP this season
I'm rockin with curry. nikka ballin out
Picture Reggie Miller with handles:naswon:
just comparing shooting skills
and skin tone
tonight was an anomaly, don't expect the same thing to happen in the Oracle Arena
parker had a better game tonight unquestionably, but overall it would be dumb to say he's better than steph in 2013
'Ol "I'm gonna ignore the facts and stick to my stupid idea ass" nikka right here![]()
let's discuss facts
steph was eating tony alive before he rolled his ankle, and is still playing efficiently despite it...you realize he had a brace on his surgically repaired ankle, and a wrap on the other one that he sprained? it's obvious he's hobbled and isn't going all out right now, to anyone besides delusional spurs stans
steph put up better numbers in the regular season and the playoffs, and has been playing better than Tony Parker consistently for the entire year..the only people disputing that are delusional spurs stans who got they dikks hard cuz they up 3-2 in the series
and the only people who ever had tony parker in any kind of MVP race were delusional spurs stans
the only fact here is delusional spurs stans are overrating tony parker again
yall reactionary ass nikkas look at one game where he outperformed a 60% steph and say "oh i guess now tony is better" despite all the overwhelming evidence throughout the season, series, and playoffs showing otherwise
What is this overwhelming evidence? TP has a much better shooting % and assist average than Stephen this year. Stephen has him beat in PPG by less than 2 points. What evidence do you use for PGs?
so FG% is "negligible" to you because Steph just has "superior scoring", even though he averaged less than 2 ppg more than Tony. I guess efficiency doesn't matter. Got it.lol
the only thing tony has over steph is the fg %, which is negligible when you factor in the amount of shots they each take, the minutes they each play and the superior scoring steph gives you
a much better assist average? steph averaged 7 tony averaged 7.5
steph outperformed him in literally every other category...shooting, scoring, rebounding, free throws, steals
now if you'd like to discuss playoff basketball, steph is still doing better than tony statistically in almost every single aspect of the game...and this is while playing injured the past couple games
averaging 41 minutes a game putting up 23.5 pts 8.3 assists 3.8 rebs 1.7 steals on 44% shooting and 40% from 3
vs
averaging 36 minutes a game putting up 23.4 pts 6 assists 4.2 rebs 1 steal shooting 47% and 30% from 3
which looks better to you?