Bron Ball: Pros and Cons

[Paper Boi]

Pros - You end up in the Finals every year

thread shoulda been locked here

 

[Marc Spector]

Bron Ball isn't inherently the problem.

The problem is that the rest of the league has adapted and in the case of GSW, adapted and leap frogged everyone else.

Like can we honestly say that if Cleveland ran a more motion offense that they wouldve beaten GSW?

I dont think so. They didnt have the personnel/youth to keep pace with them.

This is the basically the 2017 argument of "why doesnt everyone run the triangle offense".

With certain teams and player, they are who they are. And you stick with what got you there. People til this day don't understand why the Seahawks have a paltry offensive line and aren't a dynamic offensive team. Why? Because Pete Carrol knows it was a stifling defensive secondary and offensive clock control they made them such a juggernaut. Making them anything more than that would mean completely gutting the current roster.

 

[Bilz]

Because he always posts TEN PARAGRAPHS worth of shyt lol.


Honestly if he picked his arguments better instead of just pasting the same pre-written paragraphs over and over I might respond quicker

Maybe you could start limiting how much absolute garbage you pack into each one of your posts?

 

[Big Boss]

 

[Young Fab]

Df is "Bron ball"???

I swear nikkas is so lame bruh

World full of hatin ass nikkas

 

[fifth column]

Cons - you play a series against these guys on national television at the end of the season and they want to embarrass you:

It's like teams in the west feel like they should never lose to Bron ball. Whenever Bron's team win then the next year they get lit up in the finals on some revenge type shyt