Broncos reportedly not interested in Tony Romo

[T.he I.nformant]

Denver is fukking retarded if they'd rather have Lynch of Siemian over Romo.

Romo makes Denver a legit SB contender with the defense they have.

And yeah yeah yeah. Romo hasn't had success in the postseason. But he's easily better than 20 of the starting QBs in the league and way, way better than Denver's current guys.

Sanders and Thomas must be pissed off if they're refusing Tony.

Tony (who I like) comes with a price tag north of $20Ms (assuming no renogotiation)

Broncos have $39Ms in cap space

Why spend over half your cap on a injury-prone QB who struggles in the playoffs? Why not fix the o line so your pass protection and run blocking improves? Why not address the run D so you become a more well-rounded defensive force?

Getting Romo without addressing the lines would not make Denver a better team. It would just be part 2 from this past year. Nah, I'm good. Glad you're not John Elway.

 

[Anerdyblackguy]

Trevor Siemian made the probowl?!

 

[AITheAnswerAI]

Best news I heard in a while bout my Broncos. QB is not the problem. It's that line. No need in wasting a bunch of money on Romo.

Yeah sure it isn't.

Don't get me wrong, the line isn't great, and Booker stunk, but Simean and Lynch were complete shyt.

 

[Brock Landers]

This is why I'll always support players getting their guaranteed money and looking out for themselves...once you are expendable teams are quick to hit you with the

 

[BlueHeffner]

u both are idiots. Romo is washed and we need much more than qb help. We need OL and DL help. A better RB, slot wr, and a better TE before we need a qb

No he isnt


Injury prone yes, but hes nowhere near washed

 

[L&HH]

It's funny how Elways lucked up on Manning. That defense is 2nd to none in the league but he's out of his mind if he believe he can win, let alone go back to another Super Bowl with Siemian or Lynch.

I heard they are interested in but not at his current contract. He'd either have to agree to a paycut or Dallas would have to agree to have to pay part of it.

 

[T.he I.nformant]

Yeah sure it isn't.

Don't get me wrong, the line isn't great, and Booker stunk, but Simean and Lynch were complete shyt.

Don't get me wrong but I don't think you're assessing the situation correctly. It's more like Siemien isn't great, Booker and Lynch stunk, but the line was complete shyt. Big names at the sexy positions isn't the solution. Identifying weaknesses and addressing those areas of need is. Anybody who really watched the Broncos this year will tell you that if you fix the line you fix a lot of the team's offensive woes which maybe translates to winning some you lost and at least getting into the playoffs to give yourself a chance to do damage. QB isn't the primary problem. Sure, those young guys are flawed but they can play their part if we have a solid and consistent line.

 

[dora_da_destroyer]

Denver is fukking retarded if they'd rather have Lynch of Siemian over Romo.

Romo makes Denver a legit SB contender with the defense they have.

And yeah yeah yeah. Romo hasn't had success in the postseason. But he's easily better than 20 of the starting QBs in the league and way, way better than Denver's current guys.

Sanders and Thomas must be pissed off if they're refusing Tony.

Who care ld if he's better than the others if he can't get it done when it counts let alone stay on the field to get the team to where it counts. You don't give up parts for unreliability.

 

[Remote]

u both are idiots. Romo is washed and we need much more than qb help. We need OL and DL help. A better RB, slot wr, and a better TE before we need a qb

You don't live in reality.
Tony Romo has been one of the top 5 or 6 QBs of the last several years.

Denver has a very, VERY short window to win another title. They're going to blow it.

 

[Remote]

Tony (who I like) comes with a price tag north of $20Ms (assuming no renogotiation)

Broncos have $39Ms in cap space

Why spend over half your cap on a injury-prone QB who struggles in the playoffs? Why not fix the o line so your pass protection and run blocking improves? Why not address the run D so you become a more well-rounded defensive force?

Getting Romo without addressing the lines would not make Denver a better team. It would just be part 2 from this past year. Nah, I'm good. Glad you're not John Elway.

By the time you fix whatever problems you think you have elsewhere on the field, and get Siemian or Paxton ready, that defense will be depleted and old.

You go ahead and keep on kicking the can down the road.
That window is closing fast in Denver.

 

[T.he I.nformant]

By the time you fix whatever problems you think you have elsewhere on the field, and get Siemian or Paxton ready, that defense will be depleted and old.

You go ahead and keep on kicking the can down the road.
That window is closing fast in Denver.

You a Cowboys fan?

 

[LastEmperor2k2]

Why would you be, he;s fragile as shyt and old as fukk.

They should have traded for Kaep, but now they should just sign him outright when he opts out

 

[Remote]

You a Cowboys fan?

Dolphins

 

[Based Lord Zedd]

You don't live in reality.
Tony Romo has been one of the top 5 or 6 QBs of the last several years.

Denver has a very, VERY short window to win another title. They're going to blow it.

Ridiculous. Romo hasn't played a full season for the last several years. If this dude was top 5 and reliable, Dak would be on the bench.

Top 5 qbs aren't kicked off their team by rookie qbs.

 

[Remote]

Ridiculous. Romo hasn't played a full season for the last several years. If this dude was top 5 and reliable, Dak would be on the bench.

The Dak thing had to do with team continuity and mojo.

It had nothing to do with Tony's capabilities as a QB.