Bullshyt white historians put that garbage in literature without actually researching the rebellions...in fact, I argue that THEY WERE NOT riots, meaning they were not spontaneous, unorganized, and non-collective behavior...I argue that Watts and Detroit, etc. were REBELLIONS because they had a specific objective, collective action, and they attacked areas of social injustice in an organized manner...white scholars called it riots to take away the power of the demonstrations...they were rebellions against socioeconomic injustices, capitalist oppression, and white violence against blacks...they were coordinated and collective. That's the real deal.