Brunsony a bigger black hole than Melo

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
61,896
Reputation
13,388
Daps
401,111
Reppin
CHICAGO
The irony is that you are actually making my point when it comes to idiotic fan criticism. That guy who has a full career sample size should not be diminished compared to a guy who's career who's book is not fully written yet. Brunon could have the same exact arc as Carmelo, but people never learn with outlandish praise while diminishing a hall of famer

Just a week ago when Knicks beat the Celtics, multiple Knicks fans on podcasts and on ESPN were saying Brunson is "already a better Knick than Patrick Ewing". These idiotic comments should be exposed for everyone to see and not be backtracked like you are doing

BRUNSON HAS WON 4 PLAYOFF
SERIES AS A KNICK IN 3 SEASONS
WHILE MELO WON 1 IN 7 SEASONS.

NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS
FOR THE REST OF HIS CAREER
HES ALREADY ECLIPSED MELO
AS A KNICK

:devil:
:evil:
 

Michael's Black Son

Blanket Jackson
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
53,975
Reputation
16,103
Daps
236,336
Reppin
New York City & Neverland Ranch
I do find it funny that Melo was tagged as a "relic of the ball stopper early 2000s era who doesn't play smart basketball" while Brunson is lauded by NBA media as this revolutionary player that raises the ceiling of the Knicks :pachaha: :dead:

Breh a lot of these people — here and in real life — are the same ones who thought Jeremy Lin was Pope John Paul II status after 10 games.

So Brunson appearing to be somewhat competent had people overlooking things like this team being the basketball version of the Mets.

That win over the Celtics was a very Mets thing but rolling the dice on flukes and a small surge of momentum isn’t something that’s in a playbook.

There was a point where ownership was a convenient excuse but it’s coming down to:

- coaching
- players who aren’t superstars and never were
- extreme hype that is pure vaporware
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
16,465
Reputation
4,821
Daps
65,902
Brunson will never get the criticism like melo cuz he was a 2nd draft pick. Is only 6 ft tall and is a leader
This.

Brunson is like Brock Purdy or some shyt. Anything he does is going to be viewed through the underdog lens.

Both won nattys in college but Melo was 6'8" and viewed as the type of breh that could be flirting with All-Time GOAT status. Brunson was never and will never be viewed like that.
 

the cool

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,110
Reputation
-7,447
Daps
51,173
This.

Brunson is like Brock Purdy or some shyt. Anything he does is going to be viewed through the underdog lens.

Both won nattys in college but Melo was 6'8" and viewed as the type of breh that could be flirting with All-Time GOAT status. Brunson was never and will never be viewed like that.
Yeah if Brunson was in charlotte he be on Dennis Schroeder level

Only gets recogniztion cuz he on the Knicks. Same as Jeremy Lin treatment
 

GunRanger

Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
31,927
Reputation
4,987
Daps
105,553

BRUNSON HAS WON 4 PLAYOFF
SERIES AS A KNICK IN 3 SEASONS
WHILE MELO WON 1 IN 7 SEASONS.

NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS
FOR THE REST OF HIS CAREER
HES ALREADY ECLIPSED MELO
AS A KNICK

:devil:
:evil:

Melo also destroyed the knicks not wanting to play the 4 anymore after his best season in 2013. It made the Knicks trade for Bargnani:snoop:
 

DraymondT

Superstar
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
4,680
Reputation
1,642
Daps
27,044
Brunson a great player but a bad PG. His ball stoppin, shotclock eatin, bad defense playin style the biggest reason they down this series.

Every Knick this game had a positive +/- except Brunson who was -6 in 31 minutes. Bein the only player in a 9 man rotation in minus wit that many minutes don't even make sense but it matches eye test

If Knicks won challenge for that 5th foul they probably lose the game and go down 0-3. But challenge unsuccessful and Brunson had to sit his ass on the bench. Ball movement looked way better, Knicks was rollin went on a big run to come back and take lead led by KAT, bench players in a rhythm. Same shyt was happenin start of 4th in game 1 and then they imploded when Brunson checked back in the game. They would be up 2-1 if he was in foul trouble game 1 or just benched in the 4th. He a great player his iso style works in playoffs but in this series he's been a big problem for the Knicks arguably their biggest.
 

ROFL_GUY

777
Bushed
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
43,764
Reputation
-5,724
Daps
48,985
Reppin
RENO, Nevada
Brunson a great player but a bad PG. His ball stoppin, shotclock eatin, bad defense playin style the biggest reason they down this series.

Every Knick this game had a positive +/- except Brunson who was -6 in 31 minutes. Bein the only player in a 9 man rotation in minus wit that many minutes don't even make sense but it matches eye test

If Knicks won challenge for that 5th foul they probably lose the game and go down 0-3. But challenge unsuccessful and Brunson had to sit his ass on the bench. Ball movement looked way better, Knicks was rollin went on a big run to come back and take lead led by KAT, bench players in a rhythm. Same shyt was happenin start of 4th in game 1 and then they imploded when Brunson checked back in the game. They would be up 2-1 if he was in foul trouble game 1 or just benched in the 4th. He a great player his iso style works in playoffs but in this series he's been a big problem for the Knicks arguably their biggest.
Agreed bridges need at least 15 fga
 

Sterling Archer

Spider Mane
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
36,112
Reputation
11,317
Daps
176,413
Reppin
Chicago
I do find it funny that Melo was tagged as a "relic of the ball stopper early 2000s era who doesn't play smart basketball" while Brunson is lauded by NBA media as this revolutionary player that raises the ceiling of the Knicks :pachaha: :dead:
shyt is crazy ain’t it? That’s why I couldn’t care less about the narratives around players. I trust my own opinion and keep it moving.
 
Top