bytches just getting pregnant to keep u, why?

Rawtid

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
43,323
Reputation
14,708
Daps
119,486
This is about the equal say in termination. If a man doesn't want to be a father or financially hook he has much of a right as a woman. He doesn't want the kid, he shouldn't have to want it. If she wants to go ahead then it should leave the alleged father (women are promiscuous as much as men are) and the state off the hook. Simple. I guarantee unplanned pregnancies and reckless behavior from women will decrease. Men are reckless but understand the logic of rearing children and not yet being financially stable. Enough women get seen being thrown in the water without a lifeguard, later women will surely be more selective in their choice of men or take heed to men telling them they don't want a family.
He wanted the kid by default when he had unprotected sex. Period. Lmao you can't want unprotected sex but not the kids or potential stds that come with it.
 

wickedsm

Auntie Mozelle
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
14,566
Reputation
12,769
Daps
92,578
This is about the equal say in termination. If a man doesn't want to be a father or financially hook he has much of a right as a woman. He doesn't want the kid, he shouldn't have to want it. If she wants to go ahead then it should leave the alleged father (women are promiscuous as much as men are) and the state off the hook. Simple. I guarantee unplanned pregnancies and reckless behavior from women will decrease. Men are reckless but understand the logic of rearing children and not yet being financially stable. Enough women get seen being thrown in the water without a lifeguard, later women will surely be more selective in their choice of men or take heed to men telling them they don't want a family.

Nope. Let's aim for both women and men to be more selective in who they fukk .
fukking Is where babies come from, end of story.

Your suggestion is more evolved than the usual on here in that you state that the government shouldn't be involved either if the woman just refuses to capitulate to the man's demands,

However it's not the child's fault. And why would the government agree that children should starve or be homeless because the bio mother and father can't agree?

As a taxpayer with my own kids, why should I pay more to support children that are a direct result of both the child's mother and fathers irresponsible actions?

I didn't get that nut with yall. You 2 can deal with it.

I'm not saying anybody has to be picky about who they fukk. Do whatever ya like.
But to act as if both people don't have a say and contribution in creating a baby is a lie.

You don't both have a necessarily equal say in whether any given pregnancy continues (and that goes both ways- there's men who wanted to keep their aborted or adopted pregnancies) but you both have an equal say in whether a pregnancy occurs to begin with.
 
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
54,784
Reputation
25,280
Daps
254,779
Reppin
St louis
get a dna test....
:ehh:


wat6rr.jpg
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
39,931
Reputation
3,687
Daps
109,420
He wanted the kid by default when he had unprotected sex. Period. Lmao you can't want unprotected sex but not the kids or potential stds that come with it.
You're smart because you can't contend with what I wrote so you deflect and conflate that a woman isn't an equal in deciding to have unprotected sex. So, is a woman a child then? Is a man responsible for a woman's decision? If that's the case then he should get to decide if she has the child or not, right? Which is it?
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,599
She got pregnant

Individually

All on her own

With the force of her mind

She just thought "I'm going to keep him" and bam, pregnant

Right? That's what happened?





Because if not...

YOU got her pregnant.

Those bytches keep getting pregnant because YOU get them pregnant.

you were fukking her raw consistently. she obviously wasn't on BC.
u really surprised u knocked her up? :comeon:


She told me she didn't want to use condoms and she was on bc. shyts way more contrived and complicated than what y'all think.
 

Weaver31

Superstar
Joined
Jan 19, 2016
Messages
12,986
Reputation
1,242
Daps
29,356
Reppin
Va
Raw sex feels better than a condom it has nothing to do with wanting a baby
Yes it feels better but raw sex comes with possible consequences like unplanned pregnancy and STDs. If u fuk raw and fertile...then why be surprised when girl gets preggo.
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
39,931
Reputation
3,687
Daps
109,420
Nope. Let's aim for both women and men to be more selective in who they fukk .
fukking Is where babies come from, end of story.

Your suggestion is more evolved than the usual on here in that you state that the government shouldn't be involved either if the woman just refuses to capitulate to the man's demands,

However it's not the child's fault. And why would the government agree that children should starve or be homeless because the bio mother and father can't agree?

As a taxpayer with my own kids, why should I pay more to support children that are a direct result of both the child's mother and fathers irresponsible actions?

I didn't get that nut with yall. You 2 can deal with it.

I'm not saying anybody has to be picky about who they fukk. Do whatever ya like.
But to act as if both people don't have a say and contribution in creating a baby is a lie.

You don't both have a necessarily equal say in whether any given pregnancy continues (and that goes both ways- there's men who wanted to keep their aborted or adopted pregnancies) but you both have an equal say in whether a pregnancy occurs to begin with.
Let's stick to the facts and not conflate with assumptions of poverty and despair. This is about the right to deal with a sudden consequence of a humanly act. Women can put a child up for adoption, sign away parental rights to a family member, etc. Not fair that those options aren't extended to men and is actually an assault on one's civil rights and freedom as an American. These laws are mainly in place so the government isn't on the hook. Well, the government should have no right to dictate this instance especially if a man were given his options prior to that child being born. Also, you brought in the sympathy plight of a few men who wanted their "alleged" child but the woman aborted or gave him/her away. That's a point for my argument that men aren't being given options. It's between two consenting adults so if he wants him/her (the baby) then can come to an agreement with signed documentation that he sponsors the pregnancy, gives her a stipend and he gets sole custody no matter if she changes her mind. If he allows the mother to be a part of the child's life afterward then they can do so.
 

Weaver31

Superstar
Joined
Jan 19, 2016
Messages
12,986
Reputation
1,242
Daps
29,356
Reppin
Va
She told me she didn't want to use condoms and she was on bc. shyts way more contrived and complicated than what y'all think.
U should've made sure she was on BC. Some chicks lie. Also make sure u fukin a chick who u can see urself marrying in the future. Only let random THOTs slob on yo knob.
 

Rawtid

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
43,323
Reputation
14,708
Daps
119,486
You're smart because you can't contend with what I wrote so you deflect and conflate that a woman isn't an equal in deciding to have unprotected sex. So, is a woman a child then? Is a man responsible for a woman's decision? If that's the case then he should get to decide if she has the child or not, right? Which is it?
Nah You're just mad because pregnancy doesn't work the way YOU want it. Everyone knows how babies get here. Sorry but once you plant your seed you are out of control. Lose control of your life and finances because something feels good brehs.
 
Top