Cac kills unarmed cac and gets away with it because of stand your ground

ReturnOfJudah

Veteran
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Messages
38,384
Reputation
-350
Daps
114,310
White supremacists have to keep calling these murders self defense, otherwise they would have to admit their true intentions about supporting Zimmerman, Rittenhouse, and others. Now a kid doesn't have his dad and has to potentially live with the murderer. Got black people defending it on here. The "Self defense" that you all have come to know over the last 10 years isn't self defense. It's a white supremacist con game set up to kill black people with no justice. Now it's effecting white people. Literally destroying their lives so that they can save face from past injustices of letting murderers go free. Expect more of this.
Cacs set up some shyt to take us out, and now it’s eating its own :takedat:
 

Lord-Yosh

Superstar
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
8,199
Reputation
2,332
Daps
35,398
Reppin
New York
I can cry about the dude getting shot all I want but he violated several common sense ideas.

1. Don't attack someone with a gun
2. Dont attack someone with a gun while on their property.
3. Don't attack someone with a gun while on their property while in Texas of all places.

This is what happens when you let your ego and bravado overtake common sense. One moment spittle is flying out your mouth and the next moment pearly gates or the fire pits of hell are before you.

Use your brains more brehs.
This is literally what I told nikkas on Thanksgiving but they wanted to make a 25pg thread out of it.
 

Biscayne

Ocean air
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
34,219
Reputation
5,735
Daps
103,851
Reppin
Cruisin’
Guy who shot him was in his right. It was his home, and the ex husband of the woman came to his home very confrontational and he even attempted to grab the gun from the homeowner. This seems clear cut to me. If it was a confrontational black father trying to grab that weapon like that, the comments on YT would look different. There wouldn’t be any “I understand both men’s sides/it’s the wife’s fault” comments. :mjpls:
 

3rd Ward Swangin

Superstar
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
8,534
Reputation
299
Daps
22,675
aren’t they considered to be part of the Arab world or at the least the Muslim ones?
Not from my knowledge, their considered African outside of Africa. From what I've heard in Morocco they go by African, mixed and another race.

I've met one in my life and she couldn't pass for Arab. She resembled Demetria Obilor, slightly darker skin tone but really curly hair.
 

UberEatsDriver

Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
44,109
Reputation
3,143
Daps
99,257
Reppin
Brooklyn keeps on taking it.
Not from my knowledge, their considered African outside of Africa. From what I've heard in Morocco they go by African, mixed and another race.

I've met one in my life and she couldn't pass for Arab. She resembled Demetria Obilor, slightly darker skin tone but really curly hair.


The ones I’ve met in NY give me the Egyptian vibes. They seemed more worried about Morocco then Africa.
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
103,941
Reputation
13,850
Daps
245,346
I was reading about this yesterday. Kid refuses to be around the step father at all. Blames his mother. Threatening to run away if he's allowed back by the house. Apparently dude hasn't even fully divorced from his wife yet (ironically she's a judge, some people on Twitter are suggesting she's covering for him), they're still in that 'estranged' stage.
Then she already explained to the boyfriend how he can legally kill the father.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,012
Daps
132,765
I can cry about the dude getting shot all I want but he violated several common sense ideas.

1. Don't attack someone with a gun
2. Dont attack someone with a gun while on their property.
3. Don't attack someone with a gun while on their property while in Texas of all places.

This is what happens when you let your ego and bravado overtake common sense. One moment spittle is flying out your mouth and the next moment pearly gates or the fire pits of hell are before you.

Use your brains more brehs.
When your kids are involved that shyt goes out the window. I can definitely see myself not backing down from someone with a gun if it’s about my kids. As a man, you de-escalate when another man’s kids are involved. That should be a given.
 

Dzali OG

Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
15,494
Reputation
2,773
Daps
42,941
Reppin
Duval Florida
Yall are conflating the event. You must unravel this shooting piece by piece to obtain when and if justification for shooting happened and if the shooter broke the law prior.

1. Victim was there to pick up his child as agreed in custody papers.

Any laws broken there or justification to shoot him?

2. Victim got into verbal exchange with the child's mother due to child not being there.

Is it justifiable to shoot him now?

3. Victim gets into verbal exchange with wife's boyfriend. No physical altercation. The shooter asks him to leave the property to which the victim refuses.

Is it justifiable to shoot him now? This is key. Can you shoot someone for not leaving your property?

4. Shooter retrieves a rifle and again asks victim to leave? Victim refuses and aggressively enters the shooters space.

Is it within the law to now shoot him? Can you shoot an unarmed person for threatening to take a weapon you introduced and using it on you? This maybe the key. There is a size difference.

5. Shooter fires a warning shot at the feet of the victim.

If the events from #4 aren't within guidelines for self defense Kyle should be cooked here as this MAY be the first illegal action. Warning shots are not allowable in self defense.

6. After the warning shot, victim attempts to disarm Kyle.

This hinges between assault and the victim attempting self defense. If the victim has not committed any other illegal actions, he has a claim to self defense. Kyle shot at his feet.

7. Kyle retains his weapon after being tossed about. From about 10 ft away he raises his rifle and fires two shots dropping the victim..

From Kyle's perspective, the victim has just physically assaulted him by trying to take his gun.

The question is, who committed the illegal act first. Was it the victim by refusing to leave when asked? And if it is illegal, did it give the right to shoot?

If the refusal to leave isn't illegal and a green light to shoot, was the verbal altercation sufficient? Is it legal to claim self defense due to verbal altercation? Is it legal to shoot due to someone being in your face in a aggressive nature? Taking into account size difference.

Once past this, the biggest issue is the shot fired (warning shot) at the victims feet. Not only does the introduction of a gun bring in his claim for self defense. But a warning shot definitely does.

:ehh: be interesting to see how it plays out. Let's see how connected Kyle is and if his girlfriend offers some head booty and cock to the State Attorney :lolbron:.
 
Top