Cacs say "vikings are alpha"

[The Nigerian]

When they riot for stupid shyt like a sport loss or win its justified, when we riot cuz they killed one of our own for no reason is barbaric.

Their logic never adds up.

It does when you understand they're operating under the system of white supremacy.

Black people STILL don't get it.

 

[Blackout]

It does when you understand they're operating under the system of white supremacy.

Black people STILL don't get it.

It isnt logical though no matter what system they set in place.

They are trying to force things that are illogical when it comes to race and thus expect us to limit our intelligence and believe them.

 

[Just like bruddas]

But the Vikings starved to death, how is that alpha?

 

[godkiller]

The Vikings have no titular European victories, either.

 

[NoGutsNoGLory]

Underrated group, they conquered northern france and set up the Norman kingdom which conquered england and influences us to this day by proxy. The pillaging was often exagerated.

 

[NoGutsNoGLory]

And where is the proof of their achieving this en masse? Vikings were rudimentary Scandinavian raiders that attacked coastal European villages (so basically fishing towns) using hit-and-run tactics like pirates and brigands. They never defeated or challenged British and Germanic tribe interiors en masse. There's plenty of revisionism in what people think of the Vikings. The Romans did more to England, Scotland, and the like than the Vikings. The same Germanic tribes you're talking about came to defeat the Romans. When the British marshalled their strength, the Vikings never came again. I haven't seen much evidence Vikings were superior fighters than the, say, Ottoman.

hell no, they were cowards. They cobquered weak nations and the first world power they came up against they got severely beat and asked for peace.

 

[Yehuda]

The pillaging was often exagerated.

Like anything devils do.

 

[godkiller]

hell no, they were cowards. They cobquered weak nations and the first world power they came up against they got severely beat and asked for peace.

The Vikings conquered fishing villages whereas the Ottomans marched into Europe and took entire swaths of Eastern Europe on the regular. So who is the coward?

 

[NoGutsNoGLory]

The Vikings conquered fishing villages whereas the Ottomans marched into Europe and took entire swaths of Eastern Europe on the regular. So who is the coward?

Im not comparing them, im just saying bad example of a powerful people.

 

[NoGutsNoGLory]

Like anything devils do.

Not really if anything the devils lower brutality in their history. "Slavery wasnt necessarily that bad" type of shyt.

 

[godkiller]

Im not comparing them, im just saying bad example of a powerful people.

Countries and empires and armie surrender all the time. This doesn't make them cowards, just logical. The Ottoman aren't cowards for surrendering because they surrendered a few times.

Germanic savages (as the Romans called them) fought and killed and pillaged their way into Rome before sacking the city and burning it to the ground. Even today there are burns around Roman statues where the Germanic savages took every Roman coin and treasure they could find, before burning the rest and everything in it. They have more European accolades than the Vikings.

People don't idolize German barbarians because they don't have cool helms like Vikings, and didn't ride in cool boats, and didn't carry giant axes. They did, however, take revenge against the Romans.

 

[BlackBall]

cacs

 

[1thouwow]

Even is this day and age VIKINGS are alpha, They make their way across the land knocking people over and demolishing everything in their way, at the same time impregnating woman in these lands that they dominate

You gay bruh

 

[TheAlbionist]

And where is the proof of their achieving this en masse? Vikings were rudimentary Scandinavian raiders that attacked coastal European villages (so basically fishing towns) using hit-and-run tactics like pirates and brigands. They never defeated or challenged British and Germanic tribe interiors en masse. There's plenty of revisionism in what people think of the Vikings. The Romans did more to England, Scotland, and the like than the Vikings. The same Germanic tribes you're talking about came to defeat the Romans. When the British marshalled their strength, the Vikings never came again. I haven't seen much evidence Vikings were superior fighters than the, say, Ottoman.

Wait, what? Have you just made the rookie mistake of assuming that because people stop talking about "Vikings", "Northern Horde" and "Heathen Army" that the Vikings died out?

The Vikings did not die out.

They became the rulers of major tracts of England and France and were eventually just known as Normans, English or French. Plenty of English towns, especially in the North and East Midlands still carry Viking names. The entire region they settled in France is still named for them - Normandy.

They settled France so quickly, effectively and permanently that it only took a few generations before they were just regarded as French. In 1066 William The Conqueror made The Normans the last foreign power to successfully invade England, taking the crown from the last Anglo-Saxon King and keeping it "in the family" arguably until the Wars of the Roses, nearly 400 years later - the Romans never got close to that in England. Anglo Saxons were never to rule England again after William's Vikings arrived for good.

The Vikings are one of the most successful conquering cultures Europe ever saw... this thread is weird as fukk.

 

[newworldafro]

nikkas jackin off to hagar the horrible

Oh my Hey Zeus......