You guys make it a point to only focus on what's different between both sides to continue to villify the other side. That's one of many things you have in common with conservatives. Both sides want what's best for the country; again where they differ and where both sides focus is on the differences in the definitions of "better". Both sides fail in actually achieving their goals and blame the other sides for their failures. Both sides are willing to look the other way when their own people do bad (i.e. drones & deportations). Etc. Over time it just makes no sense to engage with ideologues on either side in any serious way. You are not here to exchange ideas or hear other points of view; you're here to have your own POVs celebrated and reinforced.This sounds an awful lot like a both sides argument but maybe I’m misreading your point.
@GoddamnyamanProf isn't arguing about perfection, he said progressive ideals are morally superior. Progressives want to change things for the better as society evolves. Conservatives want to keep things the same or move backwards in honor of “tradition” regardless of how that impacts vulnerable people. Practice is a whole other story like you said, but progressive politics sure do seem like they work better for societies as a whole.
That’s my surface level analysis but I think it’s what he was going for.
I will say this- in practice around the world progressivism does much better than conservatism, especially religious conservatism. But American progressives/socialists are in no way as competent or objective as Scandinavians for example. They understand the value of business, they don't double down on failure, they actually encourage the exchange of ideas rather than demonize alternative views among many other things.