Can someone explain to me why Michael Beasley isnt playing?

[reserved_one]

such a tremendous waste of talent....

Even though he might not ever pan out to be an all-star, Beasley can still be a solid rotational player.

He might be defensively, but Miami needs some scoring....which he can do.

When your down 3-1, you have to try something different

 

[mastermind]

You must be thinking about someone else

he aint a 16 field goal attempts to get 10 points type, but breh does score a point per attempt. Thats quite bad.

Spoelstra not using dude is not something to criticize Spoelstra over.

 

[Everythingg]

Use highlights against the worst team in the league to show how Beasley can help against the Spurs brehs.

This do it for you friend?

The point of that vid wasnt WHO he was doing it against but WHAT he was doing. And WHAT he was doing cannot be replicated by anyone on the team not named Lebron and Wade. I could care less really, I mean I dont mess with the heat and was rooting for the spurs. But still, it makes little sense to not even play the ONE person on your team that is young and has potential. Especially in desperate times.

 

[ManBearPig]

Why not bump my thread

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

I think YOU must be thinking of someone different

He's 6'7 not 6'9

He's really not anything special athletically

For all this talk about his offensive skill, he's never really shown it in the NBA (despite what a highlight video of what he did against the worst team in the league in a game he came into when they were already up 20 leads you to believe)

these are his career stats

Spoiler

Even when he put up decent looking numbers he was doing it on terrible %s and turning the ball over a ridiculous amount. Like I said he's just not very good, and yes, Battier, Shard, Jones, Haslem and whoever else is getting time ahead of him are much better players than him.

Are you slow...By your own admission you stated he needed 16 shots to get 10 point....His stats don't even co-sign that....So after that falsehood, I supposed to take the rest of your posts seriously.....

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

This do it for you friend?

The point of that vid wasnt WHO he was doing it against but WHAT he was doing. And WHAT he was doing cannot be replicated by anyone on the team not named Lebron and Wade. I could care less really, I mean I dont mess with the heat and was rooting for the spurs. But still, it makes little sense to not even play the ONE person on your team that is young and has potential. Especially in desperate times.

nikkas being short sighted and following agendas right now...... There isn't another player on that bench that can give you what Beasley can offensively......It aint even debatable really.....

 

[Box Factory]

Are you slow...By your own admission you stated he needed 16 shots to get 10 point....His stats don't even co-sign that....So after that falsehood, I supposed to take the rest of your posts seriously.....

Use a throw away sarcastic comment to ignore a post because you have no argument to what was said brehs

You clearly haven't watched him play in the last few years or even bothered to look up what he's done.

You also think he's 6'9, which he's not, so I guess you're opinion is irrelevant too.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Use a throw away sarcastic comment to ignore a post because you have no argument to what was said brehs

You clearly haven't watched him play in the last few years or even bothered to look up what he's done.

You also think he's 6'9, which he's not, so I guess you're opinion is irrelevant too.

Yeah,...Yeah...You met the nikka and personally measured him...

He's been listed at "6'10" ever since he was a rook...

And i have a very lucid disagreement...You're the one who posted 16 shots = 10 points for Beasley

and then was dumb enough to post his stats to show the contrary.....

And I watched him when he was a rook in MIA and when he was fukking off in Minnesota...and the point still stands that he is potentially your biggest offensive weapon on that MIA bench...

Take this bullshyt you spiitin and direct at someone who don't know no better......

 

[Box Factory]

Lol youre a sad story. Beasley was listed at 6'10 in college and was measured at 6'7 in the pre draft measurements. so yeah.

and youre whole argument is " I think he's good so he must be" but youre too stupid too realize he's been trash for several years. He cant defend , the one thing he's sposed to be good at, offense, he's terrible at. The stats back this up. but you keep living off those college numbers and halfway decent rookie season.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Lol youre a sad story. Beasley was listed at 6'10 in college and was measured at 6'7 in the pre draft measurements. so yeah.

and youre whole argument is " I think he's good so he must be" but youre too stupid too realize he's been trash for several years. He cant defend , the one thing he's sposed to be good at, offense, he's terrible at. The stats back this up. but you keep living off those college numbers and halfway decent rookie season.

Man...Shut Up...You don't know what you're talking about....

Do they play basketball barefooted....Show me a professional B Ball game where they played barefoot....

In shoes...He's over 6'8...period....And you never refuted my point about you posting contrary stats.........and that he's the best offensive weapon on that bench......

Take this p*ssy ass argument to your teenage white friends in the suburbs......

 

[Box Factory]

Lol@you being stuck on a sarcastic comment.

He's a terribly inefficient ball hog who doesn't play D. He turns the ball over more than he gets assists. He's an undersized 4 who doesn't score around the rim, shoots like ass and cant defend any1. But yeah he's an "offensive weapon"

I'm sure there's something else you could be discussing that you actually know about, so you should prolly go do that because you're making yourself look stupid by just repeating the same shyt with nothing to back it up.

Im done with you, you can go now

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Lol@you being stuck on a sarcastic comment.

He's a terribly inefficient ball hog who doesn't play D. He turns the ball over more than he gets assists. He's an undersized 4 who doesn't score around the rim, shoots like ass and cant defend any1. But yeah he's an "offensive weapon"

I'm sure there's something else you could be discussing that you actually know about, so you should prolly go do that because you're making yourself look stupid by just repeating the same shyt with nothing to back it up.

Im done with you, you can go now

at this whole post............


Just say hockey is your favorite sport man.....Its cool

 

[Box Factory]

nothing to counter what I said, AGAIN?

k

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

nothing to counter what I said, AGAIN?

k

Your replies never addressed my statements that I posted earlier....So don't play the semantics nonsense with me

16 shots to get 10 = wrong

6'7 = wrong

Not the best offensive weapon on that bench = wrong

Why should I continue to discuss basketball with a basketball dummy......

 

[Box Factory]

16 to get 10 = a sarcastic comment making fun of him for being a bad offensive basketball player

he is 6'7, maybe 6'8 in shoes. not the 6'9 or 6'10 you tried to claim.

And best offensive weapon on the bench ? So he's better then Ray and Shard?

go ahead and tell me something that isn't just "he's a great offensive weapon". I'll wait