BantuKnotz99
Pro
If i have 300 videos of various topics and 3 of those videos only contain me talking about 1 person , how many fractions of the 300 videos is the 1 person apart of?
Can someone help me with this math problem lol
- Thread starter BantuKnotz99
- Start date
I feel sorry for your mother 
Not enough information breh
Goon for hire
All Star
3/300. Divide top and bottom by 3 and you get the reduced form 1/100.
This shyt seems simple unless I’m missing something
This shyt seems simple unless I’m missing something
300/3= 1 Star
Unless it's a unique individual each time. It's another question where you can take it at face value or be an a$$hole about the details.3/300 which reduces to 1/100
Fade Runner 2049
Veteran
Trick question.
Columbo
Lieutenant
Not a problem my friend, its quite simple
1 person
3 specific videos
297 other videos
1*
-10
Hmmm not as simple as i thought. The only part of this equation that makes sense is the one star and minus 10. The rest, im not sure whats going on
1 person
3 specific videos
297 other videos
1*
-10
Hmmm not as simple as i thought. The only part of this equation that makes sense is the one star and minus 10. The rest, im not sure whats going on
BantuKnotz99
Pro
Im being serious like im trying to use it in a sentence like say you make 43 videos a month and you feature 7 ppl in those videos a month,
A fraction of how many of those 7 ppl are in those videos or percentage wise
A fraction of how many of those 7 ppl are in those videos or percentage wise
300 total videos
The criteria we are dividing by is "the times that a specific person is ONLY in the video"
In those videos, 3 of them meet the criteria (correct?)
rewritten:
In 3 of 300 videos I am talking about a person
The percentage is 1% or 3/300 or reduced to 1/100
Now,
If you are saying that there is a time where the person could appear in a video among other topics, then the fraction is undetermined by the information provided. The wording in the OP states:
the word "only" leaves some sort of ambiguity since it is in the first part of the sentence and not the second.
sure, 3 of the videos "only contain you talking about 1 person" but it is undetermined how many of the remaining 297 videos you may mention that same person. The person could be in all 300 videos for all we know, we only know that the person is "only" spoken about in 3. Nothing about the wording inherently forbids that person from being spoken about or mentioned in conjunction with other people, in the other 297 videos.
The criteria we are dividing by is "the times that a specific person is ONLY in the video"
In those videos, 3 of them meet the criteria (correct?)
rewritten:
In 3 of 300 videos I am talking about a person
The percentage is 1% or 3/300 or reduced to 1/100
Now,
If you are saying that there is a time where the person could appear in a video among other topics, then the fraction is undetermined by the information provided. The wording in the OP states:
the word "only" leaves some sort of ambiguity since it is in the first part of the sentence and not the second.
sure, 3 of the videos "only contain you talking about 1 person" but it is undetermined how many of the remaining 297 videos you may mention that same person. The person could be in all 300 videos for all we know, we only know that the person is "only" spoken about in 3. Nothing about the wording inherently forbids that person from being spoken about or mentioned in conjunction with other people, in the other 297 videos.
1%er
I don't even understand the question 