Secure Da Bag
Veteran
@ab.aspectus have you ever thought of determining the value in terms of GDP? Because you have to take into account, gas, food, gifts, condoms, accessories, and emergencies/unforeseen circumstances.
Can We Assign Value to P*ssy?
- Thread starter invalid
- Start date
Numbers are flipped. My bad, I’ll update.
And it should say “100,000,000 less women”
I actually have an excel sheet I was copying and pasting from.
Last edited:
Got a spreadsheet that is a working file. I’m trying to actually factor in multiple assumptions to get to the real value. Value by GDP is an interesting angle.
Try and calculate the value of p*ssy, but don't be able to do simple math brehs
The math is right, “men” and “women” were flipped. I also welcome corrections as I stated I didn’t really thoroughly put in checks.
if were talking online simping, its more like the top 50% of women (any woman 5/10 and up gets simped lets be real)
so skew the female population by that factor
3,800,000,000 * 0.50 = 1,900,000,000
im too lazy to do the rest of the calculation but this is more accurate
so skew the female population by that factor
3,800,000,000 * 0.50 = 1,900,000,000
im too lazy to do the rest of the calculation but this is more accurate
Kelly's Blue Book for p*ssy
EA
A Pound & A Prayer
The premise of this is hilarious 
Diondon
Thanks to the lawyers uh, I marbled the foyer
Well, the value of p*ssy has plummeted in recent years 
International Playa
Playa with a Passport
Most brehs want dymes, there is not enough dymes enough for every breh
Family Lives Matter
#FLM
if were talking online simping, its more like the top 50% of women (any woman 5/10 and up gets simped lets be real)
so skew the female population by that factor
3,800,000,000 * 0.50 = 1,900,000,000
im too lazy to do the rest of the calculation but this is more accurate
True. What I was getting at was assigning a nominal value first. That 50% of women are getting simped because they have other factors that are causing their market value to increase over their nominal value. We don’t need to reduce the p*ssy population per se, but first identify what are those factors that cause us to rate a woman 5 and above and then to assign a value to those factors that are then used to increase or decrease the value of p*ssy over the nominal value.
There are a lot of other factors that can be considered. For instance, if we include the fact that 10% of the male population is most likely homos, that reduces the male consumer population and increases the amount of available p*ssy further discounting the value.
True. So we put a premium on dymes.
Well, the value of p*ssy has plummeted in recent years
And with backpage, craigslist, and tumblr gone and a recession looming.....
