Can we have "a goofy race thread" sub forum?

JBoy

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
11,053
Reputation
1,820
Daps
27,622
Reppin
912
nikkas ran away in droves from :hamster: for freedom now they got it they don't want it.:skip:

If you don't like a thread ignore it and keep it moving. I swear nikkas here love to whine like bytches.

Sohh is still back there for you nikkas that missed that leash :mjpls:

:what: how would making a separate race-related forum (for the trolling race topics at least) cut down on your Coli posting freedom?
 

WaveCapsByOscorp™

2021 Grammy Award Winner
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,984
Reputation
-426
Daps
45,177
But what makes these topics trash though breh? :dwillhuh:
Is it your self-rightous ideals on the subject or the contents themselves. Even the troll threads bring about new ideas on subject matter beneath all the clutter. The reason you really are annoyed about these thread is that they do not fit your microcosme of universal ideals and your opinions are often dismissed and or ridiculed.

Edit: Plus anyone who take anything said on here with a grain of salt and apply their life to said ideals is an idiot and had problems way before posting and reading something on the coli.

lol, you coming into this thread talking about "freedom this" and "go back to sohh" and you have the nerve to question me about my ideals and ask if this is a matter concerning them? we're both speaking about ideals so it's pointless to try to make it seem like i'm "self-righteous" when you're pointing out how "ideal" this place is compared to sohh. all you're doing is applying the ideal of the free market to this forum. but the problem with that concept is that the trash needs to get taken out from time to time. that's inevitable.

and, you can say those troll threads do bring new ideas, but all the ideas are trash. what's the point of discussing topics of this nature only to have more bullshyt circulate? i mean, really, what type of new revelation are you going to get from a topic that disseminates flawed and biased opinions about how white women are better than black women? especially if someone comes into the thread and says the honest truth about how it's a subjective observation (this isn't debatable either, because that's what it is) and that's ignored?
 

PortCityProphet

Follow me to the truth
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
80,692
Reputation
17,518
Daps
274,824
Reppin
Bama ass DC
this place is overrun with race threads. every thread in here is race, or women/men bashing. we dont talk bout shyt else round here
 

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
40,463
Reputation
3,835
Daps
100,399
But what makes these topics trash though breh? :dwillhuh:
Is it your self-rightous ideals on the subject or the contents themselves. Even the troll threads bring about new ideas on subject matter beneath all the clutter. The reason you really are annoyed about these thread is that they do not fit your microcosme of universal ideals and your opinions are often dismissed and or ridiculed.

Edit: Plus anyone who take anything said on here with a grain of salt and apply their life to said ideals is an idiot and had problems way before posting and reading something on the coli.

:childplease: that's extremely rare and only malc does that
 

69 others

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
6,540
Reputation
786
Daps
24,236
Reppin
NULL
in general i think they should have an option to down vote threads and send them to a garbage section or the bushes after a certain amount of negative ratings i've seen it work quite well on other forums
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
2,565
Reputation
-30
Daps
2,661
Reppin
respect, usa
America 2050: population change threatens the dream - life - 19 September 2012 - New Scientist

The US is at a crossroads. Its future depends on the interwoven fates of two main groups: an ageing population of European extraction and a growing and mostly youthful population of Latin American ancestry. Unless they help each other out, warn leading demographers, the economic success that underpins the American dream may be under threat.

New Scientist's analyses of US Census Bureau data reveal large and stubbornly persistent disparities in wealth and educational achievement. If these are not narrowed, predicted population change could undermine the US's future prosperity. But the nation may yet avoid a cycle of decline – if it improves educational opportunities for young Hispanics.


At this year's Democrat and Republican conventions, the presidential candidates talked a lot about how voters were making a choice for a better future. They did not say much about the challenges posed by demography, however.


Perhaps they should have attended the annual meeting of the Population

Association of America, held in San Francisco in May. The association's president, Daniel Lichter of Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, delivered a sobering address, warning: "Our failure to effectively address policy questions of persistent racial and ethnic economic inequality… may lead to new cultural and economic fragmentation."


Some researchers believe that Lichter paints an unduly pessimistic picture. But even the optimists agree that today's decisions will have far-reaching consequences. "We're really at a watershed moment in American society," says Richard Alba, a sociologist at the City University of New York.


Demographic transition is now under way (see diagram). In illustrating the US Census Bureau projections for 2050, New Scientist chose a scenario with relatively low rates of future immigration. Yet despite the political heat surrounding this issue, a similar picture will emerge whatever happens at the US border.

See our interactive graphic: "The changing face of America"
Immigration, especially from Mexico, has been the main driver of growth in the US Hispanic population so far. But net movement across the US-Mexico border is currently close to zero. Even if the US economy picks up, immigration will not return to its 1990s peak. Family planning policies mean that Mexico's birth rate has plummeted, so there will be fewer people leaving to find work.
With most groups in the US population reproducing at less than the rate needed to replace their numbers, higher fertility rates among Hispanics in the US should be sufficient to drive the transition towards a population increasingly characterised by young Hispanics and older, non-Hispanic whites.

How important is the melting pot?

Intermarriage with the white majority, it is often said, is the final stage of assimilation into US society for a minority ethnic group.

Hispanics have a higher rate of such intermarriage than similarly disadvantaged African Americans. And some of the children of these marriages merge into the white population. Stephen Trejo at the University of Texas at Austin has found that only about two-thirds of 16- and 17-year-olds with one Mexican parent identify themselves as Mexican, according to the US Census question on Hispanic origin (Journal of Labor Economics, doi.org/dkrbpq).
Since the 1990s, however, the trend of increasing intermarriage between US Hispanics and whites has reversed. According to Daniel Lichter of Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, that seems to have been driven by second-generation US Hispanics reconnecting to their culture by marrying new immigrants (Sociological Forum, doi.org/b5dbv9). If so, reduced migration from Mexico could drive the rate of intermarriage up once more.
Still, Trejo suggests that the US should not rely on the melting pot of intermarriage to narrow the gaps in opportunity afflicting Hispanics. "It'll temper the problem a bit, but it's not going to solve it," he warns.
 
Top