can we talk for a second about how evolution is a complete crock of shyt?

[Tom Foolery]

All real

 

[The Connoisseurs]

Even Einstein try to prove to you heathens that Elohim exist

Quantum physics will tell you that you need a plug

Bask in the glory

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

@BlackPearl The Empress you are on the correct track here. DNA is the building blocks of life, you are made up of half the genes and DNA you receive from your parents, those genes make you.

Now what you said is correct about adaptation, adaptation is correct but what evolutionists try to make us believe is that adaptation can lead to whole new species, this is a lie. For one species to change to another its entire generic make up has to change, its DNA would have to change, its entire generic sequence would have to be rearranged, the number of chromosomes it has would have to change. That is Impossible. DNA makes evolution impossible Evolutionists will have you believe that if whenever a cat gave birth to kittens and you immediately chopped off its legs, and you continued to do that for generations and generations eventually cats will start giving birth to kittens with no legs, that is a lie because the kittens get their DNA and genetic make-up from their parents and the DNA of their parents code to make legs, so they will ALWAYS make legs. A fish no matter how many generations you give it and no matter what happens to it during life will never 'evolve' into a mammal because its genetic code means the genes passed down assure the offspring will always be the same as the parents, a fish. The DNA it receives from its parents will always code to make a fish. Its no coincidence that if you breed animals of different species a point is reached where the offspring is sterile.

I gave people a clue to follow when I posted this......



Funny how people sat in classes and were told this but it went over their heads. Ask yourself in any discussion in evolution has anyone every explained how it works in relation to your DNA, chromosomes and genetics? How evolution would also mean the make up of even some of the smallest cells in your body would also have to change? DNA makes evolution impossible. Charles Darwin didn't know about DNA and the workings of our genetics when he wrote the origin of species. If Watson and Crick came first, Charles Darwin would never have been.

Also I want you to peep something.......



Notice how that post of mine has been completely ignored.......

Thank you. You stated it way better. I'm no scientist and I am not religious but common sense tells me the whole story just doesn't add up. I just hate how they try to us adaptation to justify evolution. There is a huge difference .

 

[Genos]

I hate talking evolution with non scientific people because pokemon got them fukked up and they think evolution is something that happens in a day

 

[Jasonmask]

Animals have evolved in short periods of time

Fr, some of you guys are so fuking stupid

Nothing monumental like someone said it could be argued as adaptation you atheist with your tired talking points. I just like to question things and truly believing in evolution is no different than people believing in religion. Don’t @ me with some brain dead already heard before rebuttal.

 

[xCivicx]

We know you meant organisms but this is still a funny slip. Most of the evolution that is easy to believe in depends on climate. If you are a furry creature in the hot area you want less fur or no fur. If you are all bare skin in the snow you want to grow some fur.

This is adaptation, not evolution

 

[Emoryal]

It's not the same thing. I really don't think a lot of people who argue evolution really understand it because they'll use adaptation to argue evolution. They are not same. If I walk around barefoot my feet will start to look like a hobbit's to protect themselves and after a few generations my family may develop sturdier feet. That is adaptation. A booger changing into a elephant is not adaptation it's completely changing everything about a creature. That seems a little farfetched to me. People assume because a little change can be made that means that a species can change from one to the other. IDK about that.

sorry to say adaptation the way you explain it doesn't even exist

 

[xCivicx]

Tbf you also have to blame religious apologetics for the spread of misinformation. Just look at the b*stardization of nomenclature in this thread. People are acting like adaptation vs evolution is an actual point of contention. When a religious view point is made null they simply annex the scientific one and make it fit their narrative. Everything is out there...but very few people care to venture out their echo chamber or actually challenge their own ideas of the world.

Here come the pseudo-intellectuals smh

Evolution and adaptation are nowhere near the same thing

To EVOLVE, an organism has to randomly GAIN genetic information out of thin air. Information that never appeared in their genetic code before

To ADAPT, an organism has to trigger a dormant part of their genetic code

A human growing more hair in a colder climate is ADAPTING, because most humans have the capacity to grow hair

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Even Einstein try to prove to you heathens that Elohim exist

Quantum physics will tell you that you need a plug

Bask in the glory

This is a point I thought of when another poster said what happens on a small scale happens on a large scale. That is completely not true. The first thing I thought of was quantum physics.

 

[MikeyC]

I believe most scientific theories, but I’ll say this though. If evolution is true then why don’t monkeys still evolve? If that’s what humans are made from why don’t we see any kind of metamorphs? I don’t wanna hear it takes a long time foh world history has been around long enough in modern times to see some kind of significance

 

[OneManGang]

@BlackPearl The Empress you are on the correct track here. DNA is the building blocks of life, you are made up of half the genes and DNA you receive from your parents, those genes make you.

Now what you said is correct about adaptation, adaptation is correct but what evolutionists try to make us believe is that adaptation can lead to whole new species, this is a lie. For one species to change to another its entire generic make up has to change, its DNA would have to change, its entire generic sequence would have to be rearranged, the number of chromosomes it has would have to change. That is Impossible. DNA makes evolution impossible Evolutionists will have you believe that if whenever a cat gave birth to kittens and you immediately chopped off its legs, and you continued to do that for generations and generations eventually cats will start giving birth to kittens with no legs, that is a lie because the kittens get their DNA and genetic make-up from their parents and the DNA of their parents code to make legs, so they will ALWAYS make legs. A fish no matter how many generations you give it and no matter what happens to it during life will never 'evolve' into a mammal because its genetic code means the genes passed down assure the offspring will always be the same as the parents, a fish. The DNA it receives from its parents will always code to make a fish. Its no coincidence that if you breed animals of different species a point is reached where the offspring is sterile.

I gave people a clue to follow when I posted this......



Funny how people sat in classes and were told this but it went over their heads. Ask yourself in any discussion in evolution has anyone every explained how it works in relation to your DNA, chromosomes and genetics? How evolution would also mean the make up of even some of the smallest cells in your body would also have to change? DNA makes evolution impossible. Charles Darwin didn't know about DNA and the workings of our genetics when he wrote the origin of species. If Watson and Crick came first, Charles Darwin would never have been.

Also I want you to peep something.......



Notice how that post of mine has been completely ignored.......

You have a severe misunderstanding of everything you’re trying to discuss. Not going to spend my Sunday arguing with you about it, but I will correct your statement for others to understand.

DNA was hypothesized long before 1953. Scientists knew there had to be a genetic component to evolution for a long time, but lacked the evidence to prove it. It wasnt until the technology to prove its structure was available that the double helix form of DNA was discovered by Rosalind Franklin, Watson, and Crick in the 50s. We finally had scientific data to prove DNAs existence and how it’s structure was.

 

[scarlxrd]

Evolution is an absolute fact.

 

[xCivicx]

AND ONCE AGAIN, if you believe that the THEORY of evolution is somehow magically a FACT, then you ALSO BELIEVE in the INHERENT GENETIC INFERIORITY OF THE AFRICAN TO THE EUROPEAN

Darwin had 0 PROOF of evolution in ANY living system that exists on this plane. He "proved" evolution by saying that the AFRICAN is closer in genetic makeup to PRIMATES, so the EUROPEAN must have EVOLVED from the AFRICAN

The european actually MUTATED, but most of the simple minded people in this thread attempting to defend this pseudo-science will probably barely comprehend what I've already posted, so lemme not get too deep just yet

 

[Lamar Givens]

Once again do I need to destory these cac Darwinian evolution believing brehs in this thread...

REALLY!!!

DNA
Irreducible complexity
Molecules to man evolution (pseudoscience)
etc etc etc

 

[OneManGang]

This is a point I thought of when another poster said what happens on a small scale happens on a large scale. That is completely not true. The first thing I thought of was quantum physics.

Biology and quantum physics are not even comparable. We are talking about small chemical changes in cells that change their function and activate genes that may be dormant or mutations leading to cellular change.

Quantum physics are things happening on such a minute scale that we don’t even fully understand what’s going on. Maybe one day we can bridge that misunderstanding and have quantum biology but right now no