Candace Owens message to FBA

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
60,828
Reputation
-20,345
Daps
78,905
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
So then quit being cryptic and explain. :skip:

BASICALLY.. JEWS ARE DIFFERENT PEOPLE GENETICALLY FROM WHITE PEOPLE

WHILE MOST JEWS IN AMERICA ARE ASHKENAZI JEWS (WHITE PASSING) THIS IS FROM SPENDING CLOSE TO 3,000 YEARS ASSIMILATING IN EUROPE AND MIXING WIT THE LOCALS AFTER BEING EXILED FROM ISRAEL.... SO YES, THEY DO HAVE EUROPEAN DNA IN THE SAME WAY MANY BLACK AMERICANS TODAY HAVE EUROPEAN DNA (IMAGINE WHAT STEPH CURRY WOULD LOOK LIKE IF HIS ANCESTRY WAS MIDDLE EASTERN AS OPPOSED TO BLACK) .. AND BLACK PEOPLE ONLY BEEN IN AMERICA 400-500 YEARS, NOT 3,000 .. SO U CAN IMAGINE WHATLL HAPPEN DOWN THE LINE

BUT THE EUROPEAN ANCESTRY ONLY PERTAINS TO ASHKENAZI JEWS.. THE MAJORITY OF JEWS IN ISRAEL ARE ACTUALLY MIZRAHI JEWS WHO NEVER SET FOOT IN EUROPE, SO THEIR ENTIRE GENEOLOGY IS MIDDLE EASTERN ...

UNLESS U CONSIDER ARABS, PERSIANS, EGYPTIANS, ETC AS "WHITE" .. THEN NEITHER ARE JEWS. AND DEFINITELY NOT MIZRAHI JEWS.
 

ORDER_66

I am The Wrench in all your plans....
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
152,587
Reputation
17,275
Daps
600,905
Reppin
Queens,NY
All the FBA's in america should just ignore candice owens let her reap what she has sown...:yeshrug: she got into bed with these folks, let her deal with it on her own...thread shouldnt have even been made.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
60,828
Reputation
-20,345
Daps
78,905
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Why is commercial DNA testing banned for the most part in Israel..?

COMMERCIAL DNA TESTING IS NOT BANNED, IT IS REGULATED BY GOVERNMENT FOR LEGAL PURPOSES SUCH AS PATERNITY TESTING ETC.

THIS SAME LAW APPLIES TO SOUTH KOREA, NORTH KOREA, SAUDI ARABIA, MOROCCO, FRANCE, AUSTRIA, SWITZERLAND, GERMANY, CHINA, INDIA, PORTUGAL AND MANY OTHERS


THERE IS NO SHORTAGE OF JEWISH DNA TESTING .. THERE IS ENDLESS AMOUNTS OF STUDIES ON JEWISH DNA HERE IN AMERICA WHERE DNA TESTING ISNT REGULATED

OUT OF ALL THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES, THIS IS ONE OF THE DUMBER AND LESS THOUGHT OUT ONES.
 

The Burger King

Fast Food Gangsta
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
9,244
Reputation
14,569
Daps
88,418
Reppin
East Whopper City
BASICALLY.. JEWS ARE DIFFERENT PEOPLE GENETICALLY FROM WHITE PEOPLE

WHILE MOST JEWS IN AMERICA ARE ASHKENAZI JEWS (WHITE PASSING) THIS IS FROM SPENDING CLOSE TO 3,000 YEARS ASSIMILATING IN EUROPE AND MIXING WIT THE LOCALS AFTER BEING EXILED FROM ISRAEL.... SO YES, THEY DO HAVE EUROPEAN DNA IN THE SAME WAY MANY BLACK AMERICANS TODAY HAVE EUROPEAN DNA (IMAGINE WHAT STEPH CURRY WOULD LOOK LIKE IF HIS ANCESTRY WAS MIDDLE EASTERN AS OPPOSED TO BLACK) .. AND BLACK PEOPLE ONLY BEEN IN AMERICA 400-500 YEARS, NOT 3,000 .. SO U CAN IMAGINE WHATLL HAPPEN DOWN THE LINE

BUT THE EUROPEAN ANCESTRY ONLY PERTAINS TO ASHKENAZI JEWS.. THE MAJORITY OF JEWS IN ISRAEL ARE ACTUALLY MIZRAHI JEWS WHO NEVER SET FOOT IN EUROPE, SO THEIR ENTIRE GENEOLOGY IS MIDDLE EASTERN ...

UNLESS U CONSIDER ARABS, PERSIANS, EGYPTIANS, ETC AS "WHITE" .. THEN NEITHER ARE JEWS. AND DEFINITELY NOT MIZRAHI JEWS.
I get that, but what I’m ultimately saying is the ones who would’ve been involved in the slave trade were at least “honorary white”.

Most CACs don’t consider Spaniards “white”, but clearly that didn’t matter in the context of the slave trade.

Personally I don’t even believe it was primarily Jews involved in it anyway, clearly it’s a deflection tactic.

Ultimately my argument is that even if that were the case, CACs aren’t off the hook because their demand for slaves supported the supply.

And even after the TAST ended it was CACs in the Americas trading slaves from territory to territory (example: Africans being sent from Cuba to Florida, from Haiti to Louisiana, etc) so all of what she’s saying is just running interference for white supremacists.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
60,828
Reputation
-20,345
Daps
78,905
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
I get that, but what I’m ultimately saying is the ones who would’ve been involved in the slave trade were at least “honorary white”.

Most CACs don’t consider Spaniards “white”, but clearly that didn’t matter in the context of the slave trade.

Personally I don’t even believe it was primarily Jews involved in it anyway, clearly it’s a deflection tactic.

Ultimately my argument is that even if that were the case, CACs aren’t off the hook because their demand for slaves supported the supply.

And even after the TAST ended it was CACs in the Americas trading slaves from territory to territory (example: Africans being sent from Cuba to Florida, from Haiti to Louisiana, etc) so all of what she’s saying is just running interference for white supremacists.


LIKE U SAID.. ITS A DEFLECTION TACTIC

JEWS HAD THEIR OWN PROBLEMS TO WORRY ABOUT DURING THOSE TIMES



The idea that Jews “ran” or controlled the transatlantic slave trade is a well-known antisemitic trope, not a historical fact. It comes from conspiracy thinking that falsely portrays Jews as secretly controlling major systems of power and harm.

In reality, the transatlantic slave trade was overwhelmingly organized, financed, and enforced by European empires and Christian merchants, especially from Portugal, Spain, Britain, France, and the Netherlands. It was supported by state governments, royal charters, colonial laws, and large trading companies. The vast majority of slave traders, ship owners, and plantation owners were Christian Europeans.

Jews were a tiny minority in Europe and the Americas at the time and often faced legal restrictions, expulsion, and persecution. A small number of individual Jews participated in trade, just as individuals from many groups did, but they did not control, dominate, or design the slave trade. Serious historians agree on this.

The trope persists because it serves an ideological purpose: it shifts blame away from the actual systems and governments that created and benefited from slavery, and instead targets Jews as a scapegoat. This mirrors other antisemitic myths that exaggerate Jewish influence to suggest secret control or collective guilt.


Holding Jews collectively responsible for slavery is both historically false and morally wrong. Slavery was a global system upheld by empires and institutions, not by one religious or ethnic group. Repeating this trope spreads misinformation and fuels antisemitism rather than helping us understand history honestly.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
60,828
Reputation
-20,345
Daps
78,905
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Farrakhan put all this out in the Secret Relationship between Blacks and jews

How “The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews” Has Been Debunked​

1. It Misrepresents Sources

The book often quotes real historical documents out of context to exaggerate Jewish involvement in slavery.

  • Individual Jewish names are highlighted while Christian and state-run institutions are minimized or ignored.
  • When historians examine the same sources in full, they do not support the book’s conclusions.
Multiple scholars have reviewed its citations and found that the evidence does not match the claims being made.


2. It Ignores Proportions and Scale

Serious historical research shows:

  • Jews made up a tiny fraction of slave traders in the Atlantic world.
  • The slave trade was dominated by European governments, royal charter companies, and Christian merchantsfrom Britain, Portugal, Spain, France, and the Netherlands.
  • Jewish communities were small, often poor, and legally restricted during this period.
Highlighting a handful of Jewish individuals while ignoring the overwhelming majority is statistical manipulation, not honest history.


3. It Promotes Collective Guilt

The book treats Jews as a unified group acting together, which is a hallmark of antisemitic thinking.

  • Jews are portrayed as secretly coordinated and disproportionately powerful.
  • This mirrors classic antisemitic myths used for centuries in Europe to justify persecution.
Historians emphasize that individual participation ≠ group responsibility — a basic rule of historical analysis the book violates repeatedly.


4. It Has Been Rejected by Professional Historians

Mainstream historians — including Black, Jewish, and non-Jewish scholars — have publicly criticized the book.

Examples include:

  • Henry Louis Gates Jr., who called the claims misleading and inflammatory
  • David Brion Davis, one of the most respected historians of slavery, who rejected the book’s conclusions
  • Academic reviews showing it fails basic standards of historical methodology
There is no credible academic consensus supporting the book’s thesis.


5. It Serves an Ideological, Not Educational, Purpose

The book emerged in a political context where:

  • Blame for slavery was redirected away from empires and institutions
  • Jews were positioned as a scapegoat
  • Historical complexity was flattened into a conspiracy narrative
This doesn’t help Black history or Jewish history — it distorts both.


“The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews” has been debunked because it:

  • Cherry-picks evidence
  • Ignores historical scale and context
  • Promotes collective guilt
  • Aligns with long-standing antisemitic tropes
  • Is rejected by credible historians
Understanding slavery honestly means confronting state power, colonialism, and economic systems, not blaming one marginalized group.
 

omnifax

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
3,789
Reputation
1,171
Daps
10,475
Reppin
Kalamazoo, MI #ADOS
She ain't "coming home". This is all about her fight with Ben Shapiro and diving further into her already present anti-semitism. All those conservative talking heads are trying to be the lead commentator in the wake of Charlie Kirk's death and she's in the lead. What's really funny is Shapiro hired her when he knew she was anti-semetic but didn't care because at the time she was pro-Israel and anti-black. Now that she's turning on Israel he's trying to deal with the monster he helped create. I hope they all destroy themselves for engaing in this hateful rhetoric and spreading it to the masses just to make money.
 
Top