a few things i didnt see mentioned here...
candace dug up what she and others are citing as proof. "receipts" if you will
these folks sued a couple other people for this and ultimately lost
his wife, the person in question, is allegedly his father
yea i watched the whole series
And here is where people “do their own research” while failing to be thorough
A. The Macrons initially won the case but it was overturned not because they were correct but because the judge couldnt determine if it was intentional.
A French appeals court recently overturned the initial conviction of two women who were found guilty of libel against French First Lady Brigitte Macron
. The initial verdict stemmed from claims spread online that she was born a man.
The appeals court's decision was based on a "good faith" defense, arguing that the defendants made the mistake in "good faith." The court found that many of the statements made by the defendants were "too inaccurate" or "inconsistent" to constitute defamation under French law.
It is important to note that Brigitte Macron has since appealed this decision to France's highest court, the Court of Cassation. The case is ongoing, and the ultimate outcome remains to be determined.
Notice the use of the word “mistake” as in the allegations weren’t true?
B. The Macrons provided evidence to Owens for a while and she still refused to stop. This will make malicious intent easier to prove as she ignored it.
Perhaps you might think about looking into issues more before accepting the word of a grifter c00n but sadly I suspect you won’t.
Oh and fukk Macron. But this isn’t about her as a person. It’s about whether or not Owens intentionally spread lies about her being a man. Signs say she did.