You are waisting people’s time with this stupidity.
You are an irrelevant individual.
Charlie Kirk (Turning Points USA) shot and killed during event in Utah; Suspect Tyler Robinson charged
- Thread starter GnauzBookOfRhymes
- Start date
You are an irrelevant individual.
mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
Nope
You are a lazy person and your copypasta showed us that.
And also, ChatGPT is opinion based that’s sourced from most of the internet. It’s not fact. You showed us you are incapable capable of forming your own reasonings and rationale.
It’s a dark time when people think ChatGPT/AI can replace their own thoughts like @Ish Gibor does
Why not? Explain that…
Do you understand what’s going on now?
Or are you that dimwitted?
You probably have no idea how forensics work.
mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
Especially when this has been one of the 10 biggest stories on planet earth the last week. @Ish Gibor is incapable of doing his own research and generating his own thoughts on a question. He couldn't even paraphrase what was in ChatGPT. It's very sad.
Are you dumb?
This is 2025, a Chat bot can do tasks at the rate no human can do I the same amount of time.
You are not just dumb, but also irrelevant.
And now you are wasting people’s time with dumb arguments.
That’s your contribution, waisting people’s time.
It explains why you make no progress in life.
mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
You copy pasted 500 words from a prompt to a question no one asked. Like I said, you are intellectually lazy.
ChatGPT and other Chat bots work with advanced search engines. It does what you and I plus 10 other people can do, within seconds.
It’s what you ask it do and how you formulate the prompt.
You have no idea what you’re talking about.
As I said, you are dumb.
Why would I write 500 words, when a Chat bot can do that task?
I have a lot of things to do, and so I can manage my time better, dimwit.
I’m not going to spend a week doing research on something a chat bot can do within seconds. It’s that simple.
mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
Sorry
It was 880 words. And yes, why would you write 880 words. That is the fukking point. That’s why you summarize, paraphrase and think for yourself. You've told us you can’t do that.
So to summarize:
1) @Ish Gibor is lazy
2) @Ish Gibor let’s ChatGPT do remedial thinking for him
3) @Ish Gibor wasted everyone’s time copy and pasting an 880 word ChatGPT reply to a question no one asked.
It’s the same, dummy. Actually it’s worse. And even more time consuming.
mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
These replies, it’s clear why you use ChatGPT. You are that lazy.
What has your contribution been in here thus far, that made this thread more interesting? What valuable information have you posted?
And I don’t mean arguing over someone using a chat bot.
It pains you that your lord Charlie Kirk has been exposed as a fraudulent Christian. Not by me, but by a non-biased party like an AI Chat bot.
Here you literally copy-paste an entire page from a site, but I am the lazy one?
And I literally went into your history postings, to see what you have posted and contributed. The longest post by you had at most 8 sentences, out of hundreds of posts. I exceeded that by far with many posts.
Lord Jamar endorses Donald Trump for president
There’s no logical reason for any self respecting black or brown person to vote for Trump. He openly says and does racist shyt. Too many people out there do things just to be different. One thing I learned is everybody can’t be saved. If you rock with that orange klansman then that’s on you.
www.thecoli.com
Here I did an essay on you.
And here is more, to debunk your weirdo claims.
Last edited:
@Ish Gibor can you ask chat gpt if Arabic voters have been vindicated by the election of Donald Trump? Smooth mind never followed up on this 
plenty people speaking in their own words posting straight-up misinformation. I appreciate the comprehensive information since some posts contains info I wasn't aware of.
It's free to use, I have a paid version for advanced tasks. I would not know, but a Chat box comes ad hand for quick research.@Ish Gibor can you ask chat gpt if Arabic voters have been vindicated by the election of Donald Trump? Smooth mind never followed up on this
Btw, the Duck Duck Go browser has several LLM (Large Languages Models) for free. But these models are usually older models, not as advanced and fast as the latest models. I use ChatGTP for basically anything, complex weight-lift workout programs, complex diet programs, studying software development, learning foreign languages, automated newsfeeds etc, It shows comprehensive data within seconds.
For your question, it gathered different sources and I asked it to clean it up and make a side-by-side format table.
Conclusion
So, to your question: have Arabic (or Arab American) voters been vindicated by Trump’s election? The short answer is: partially, in the sense that their grievances are being acknowledged more openly, but not fully — many of the outcomes so far are controversial and may not satisfy what many in those communities consider justice or a fair policy.If by “vindicated” you meant something more specific — e.g. vindicated in their policy preferences, in their distrust of past administrations, or in their prediction that U.S. foreign policy would drift further from what they hoped for — I can try to assess how well those are holding up. Do you want me to run through that?
Arab Voters and Trump’s Election: Expectations vs. Reality
| Arab Voters’ Expectations | Trump’s Actual Policies & Outcomes |
|---|---|
| Break away from Democrats as protest against Biden–Harris policies on Gaza and Israel. | Arab Americans split their vote more evenly, with many shifting to Trump or third parties — their political weight became more visible. |
| Hoped for greater recognition of Arab concerns, particularly regarding Palestinian suffering. | Trump appointed Arab-descended officials and gave symbolic attention to Arab American voices, suggesting acknowledgment. |
| Expected a shift toward more balanced U.S. policy in the Middle East. | Trump proposed controversial measures, such as a U.S. “takeover” of Gaza and relocation of Palestinians, which many Arab groups condemned as provocative and dangerous. |
| Desired policies leading to justice, fair representation, and solutions for the Palestinian question. | Policies so far have heightened fears of displacement and instability, leaving many Arab voters disillusioned. |
Conclusion: Arab voters succeeded in drawing national attention to their concerns and breaking old political patterns, but Trump’s policies have not fulfilled their hopes. Their discontent has been validated, yet true vindication — in the form of just and constructive policy — remains elusive.
Last edited:
