Charlie Kirk (Turning Points USA) shot and killed during event in Utah; Suspect Tyler Robinson charged

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,653
Reputation
860
Daps
7,139
I would not be surprise if that happened.

so long as they teach how much of a piece of shyt he is.
knowing OK they'll deify him
They probably did this assassination themselves and are now overcompensating to make it appear as if it was actually the "left"...

This case is janky from all sides, nothing makes sense. The only thing that makes sense is that it comes from a horrible movie script, written by an amateur.


Oklahoma to require ideology test for teachers from New York and California
Politics Aug 19, 2025 1:43 PM ED



MAGA Official Announces Chilling School Partnership With Turning Point
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling
Wed, September 24, 2025 at 5:23 PM GMT+2


 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,653
Reputation
860
Daps
7,139
"A tense and revealing debate unfolds on CNN as host Abby Phillip confronts two prominent MAGA commentators, holding their feet to the fire over the GOP's escalating performative gestures surrounding Charlie Kirk. The discussion zeroes in on concrete actions, like the state of Oklahoma mandating TP USA chapters in all schools and statues of the far-right figure on every university campus. Phillip anchors a rigorous examination of the narratives championed by pro-Trump media, steering the conversation toward a direct demand for accountability.

In this no-holds-barred exchange, Abby Phillip pointedly challenges the MAGA pundits to answer for the dangerous rhetoric proliferating within their movement. She forces the discussion beyond facile blame-shifting and demands they move past the tired trope of faulting "the left" for every controversy. The segment intensifies into a sharp clash over evidence, as Phillip relentlessly pushes her guests to justify their defenses of Trump and MAGA ideology without resorting to hollow false equivalencies. Faced with this direct challenge, the MAGA figures double down on disingenuous arguments, dismissing legitimate concerns about Kirk's own statements as mere partisan warfare and media hype. This clip is a masterclass in modern political confrontation, laying bare the deep chasm in how reality is framed and contested in America. It offers viewers an essential, critical look at the clash between Trump's most vocal defenders and the journalistic rigor holding them to account."





I was able to retrieve Affirmative Act and DEI data. I had to train the chat bot for almost 30 minutes to accumate, test and calculate the datasets from Oklahoma State. These are close proximities, not absolute. Although I did use the official data released by Oklahoma State. And of course we already knew and what was to be expected.



A side-by-side table for Oklahoma’s Affirmative Action era (1994–2012) showing:
  • Absolute gains in employment (change in headcount from 1994 → 2012).
  • Proportional gains (percentage growth relative to 1994 baseline).

📊 Oklahoma Affirmative Action Gains by Group (1994–2012)

Group1994 Employees2012 EmployeesAbsolute Gain% Gain vs 1994Notes
White Women11,80114,637+2,836+24.0%Largest numerical gain
Black Men2,6683,332+664+24.9%Solid proportional growth
Black Women4,9246,046+1,122+22.8%Consistent increases
Native Men1,4812,024+543+36.7%High proportional growth
Native Women2,2933,074+781+34.1%Strong proportional growth
Hispanic/Asian7881,336+548+69.6%Highest relative % growth

🔎 Interpretation

  • White women gained the most in absolute numbers (almost +3,000), becoming the main beneficiaries.
  • Hispanic/Asian groups showed the highest proportional growth (+70%), though from a smaller base.
  • Native men/women also had very strong proportional gains (~+35%).
  • Black men/women grew steadily but slightly less in relative terms (~+23%).

👉 This shows Affirmative Action in Oklahoma benefited white women most in raw numbers, but minority groups (esp. Hispanic/Asian and Native) saw the strongest proportional gains.


The educational attainment benchmarks with the workforce demographic shares and calculate a DEI representation ratio (Actual ÷ Expected).

📊 Oklahoma State Workforce Representation vs. Education Pipeline


GroupExpected (based on education attainment)Actual (in workforce)Gap (Actual – Expected)DEI Ratio (Actual ÷ Expected)
White23.0%77.3%+54.3 pts (over-represented)3.36
Black / African American18.7%10.3%–8.4 pts (under-represented)0.55
American Indian13.7%7.4%–6.3 pts (under-represented)0.54
Hispanic12.2%3.0%–9.2 pts (severely under-represented)0.24
Asian32.4%2.0%–30.4 pts (severely under-represented)0.06

📌 How to interpret this

  • White employees are over-represented by a factor of ~3.4 compared to their share of the degree-holding population.
  • Black and Native American employees are each about half as represented as expected based on education levels.
  • Hispanics are severely under-represented, at only ~¼ of their expected presence.
  • Asians are the most under-represented group: despite being the most educated group in Oklahoma (over 45% bachelor’s+), they make up only ~2% of the state workforce.
✅ This “DEI Ratio” approach highlights systemic disparities between education supply and workforce hiring outcomes.
 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,653
Reputation
860
Daps
7,139
Conservatives vs. KKK: Spot the Difference | The Daily Show



Charlie Kirk's Death Exposed America

 

eastside313

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
18,995
Reputation
1,232
Daps
38,368
These Charlie videos taking me back to when Alex jones was wasn’t a complete maniac and used to have the conspiracy videos poppin.

They sacrificed him hoping the republicans will forget about getting jail sexed in the bbb and vote off their racism again next year.
 

Reality Check

Keepin' it 100
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,540
Reputation
2,475
Daps
54,802
These Charlie videos taking me back to when Alex jones was wasn’t a complete maniac and used to have the conspiracy videos poppin.

They sacrificed him hoping the republicans will forget about getting jail sexed in the bbb and vote off their racism again next year.

That piece of shyt was always a complete maniac. There's no sane washing that fukkboy.
 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,653
Reputation
860
Daps
7,139
That piece of shyt was always a complete maniac. There's no sane washing that fukkboy.
This interview is from 2016, January 20 2016 InfoWars.

The approximately 90-minute session covered important subjects and must be heard in its entirety.

Louis Farrakhan Alex Jones Full Interview.

 

MAKAVELI25

the heir apparent
Supporter
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
19,151
Reputation
5,705
Daps
75,725
Reppin
#ByrdGang
This interview is from 2016, January 20 2016 InfoWars.

The approximately 90-minute session covered important subjects and must be heard in its entirety.

Louis Farrakhan Alex Jones Full Interview.



God bless the soul who would spend 90 minutes of their life watching an Alex Jones video

no-shake-head.gif
 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,653
Reputation
860
Daps
7,139
God bless the soul who would spend 90 minutes of their life watching an Alex Jones video

no-shake-head.gif
That conversation with Farrakhan was during the presidential elections, and became as decisive moment for how politics got framed and is framed now. Alex became instrumental in framing the election and narratives at the time.

"He's like the Goebbels of 2016," a longtime Jones associate, referring to Joseph Goebbels, Adolf Hitler's chief propagandist, told BuzzFeed in May. "He really won the election for Trump."



"4:17 ... was no black boss so his Trump a black his Trumper a white boss or crop was a white boy before he got to the White House that's why that's how he got to the White House Trump is it boss he bossed his way to the White House he's bossing his way in the White House Trump is the quintessential white ..."

"5:01 ... this dominance hierarchy with the white male as the Alpha that's how he got into office it was angry white men feeling disenfranchised because of their seeming lack of power and frightened white women also believing that their man is powerless and disenfranchised they put Trump in the office so and ..."

 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,653
Reputation
860
Daps
7,139
These Charlie videos taking me back to when Alex jones was wasn’t a complete maniac and used to have the conspiracy videos poppin.

They sacrificed him hoping the republicans will forget about getting jail sexed in the bbb and vote off their racism again next year.
That is because there is a pattern, it all interconnects. This is why in my previous posts I did all these analysis and I have done more research, which I havent posted here. But it goes all the way back to the neocons and "Tea party".

Charlie was recruited by these people, and it happend during the Trayvon Martin situation.
 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,653
Reputation
860
Daps
7,139
Charlie Kirk’s sentiment was “The Great Replacement”.




The “Great Replacement” is a conspiracy theory that originated in far-right circles in Europe and has since spread globally.

Core Idea

  • It claims that white, European, or “native” populations are being “replaced” by non-white immigrants, Muslims, or other minority groups through immigration, higher birth rates, and cultural changes.
  • The theory usually frames this as intentional, orchestrated by elites (politicians, business leaders, Jews, or “globalists” depending on the variant).

Origins

  • The phrase itself was popularized by French writer Renaud Camus in his 2011 book Le Grand Remplacement.
  • Camus argued that immigration and demographic change in France were leading to the erosion of French identity and culture.

Spread

  • It became a rallying idea for European far-right and white nationalist movements.
  • In the U.S., it has been echoed in debates about immigration, sometimes directly (by extremists) and sometimes in softened language (“demographic change,” “invasion”).

Violence Connection


The theory has inspired several acts of mass violence. Attackers in:
  • Christchurch, New Zealand (2019),
  • El Paso, Texas (2019),
  • Buffalo, New York (2022)
    explicitly referenced the “Great Replacement” in their manifestos.

Academic & Critical View​

  • Demographers point out that populations naturally change due to migration, births, and social mobility — not because of a coordinated plot.
  • The theory is widely discredited as racist, xenophobic, and antisemitic, often serving as a justification for political extremism and violence.

Mainstream figures sometimes echo “Great Replacement” ideas without naming it:

1. United States
  • Some conservative politicians and commentators (e.g. on Fox News, like Tucker Carlson before he left the network) have suggested that Democrats want to “import” immigrants to outnumber Republican voters.
  • This frames immigration as a political strategy, not just a demographic shift, which parallels the replacement narrative.
  • Phrases like “They’re trying to change the electorate” or “voter replacement” are common coded versions

2. Europe
  • Right-wing parties such as Marine Le Pen’s National Rally (France) or Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz (Hungary) often warn about immigration “destroying” national identity or Christianity.
  • Orbán has explicitly spoken of a “population exchange” between Europeans and migrants, very close to “Great Replacement” wording.
3. Softened Language

Instead of saying “replacement,” mainstream discourse often uses terms like:
  • “Demographic change”
  • “Culture under threat”
  • “Loss of tradition”
  • “They want open borders to dilute our values”

These frames avoid the overtly conspiratorial tone but still carry the same underlying fear of being “outnumbered” or “overrun.”

4. Why This Matters
  • By using softer language, politicians/media normalize a dangerous idea without embracing its violent extremes.
  • For audiences already primed with fears about immigration or minority growth, this can bridge mainstream rhetoric with extremist conspiracy theories.
 
Top