Charlie Kirk (Turning Points USA) shot and killed during event in Utah; Suspect Tyler Robinson charged

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,665
Reputation
860
Daps
7,143

They are doing the most with this worshipping.

Sign of the time!

Prompt how was “he …” transported:

Here’s the complete “Day of the Assassination” timeline with the hospital/post-transport details integrated:


📅 Full Timeline of Charlie Kirk Assassination (Sep 10, 2025)


Time (MDT)Event
8:29 a.m.Suspect Tyler Robinson arrives at Utah Valley University in a gray Dodge Challenger.
~11:49 a.m.Surveillance captures suspect in a nearby neighborhood.
12:00 p.m.“American Comeback Tour” event begins at UVU Fountain Courtyard (~3,000 attendees).
12:05-12:09 p.m.Kirk tosses hats, engages with audience.
12:23 p.m.Shooting: Kirk is hit by gunfire from the rooftop of the Losee Center building (~200 yards away).
~12:23–12:25 p.m.Kirk is carried by six men from the scene to a nearby SUV (not an ambulance). The SUV departs immediately for Timpanogos Regional Hospital in Orem.
Hospital arrival (time not publicly stated)Taken into emergency care. Utah Dept. of Public Safety said he was “pronounced dead hours later,” but mentor Frank Turek said doctors briefly restored a pulse and a surgeon pronounced him dead within ~30 minutes of arrival. (Conflicting accounts.)
12:36 p.m.Reactions begin; political figures post statements.
12:39 p.m.FBI and local police arrive on scene.
~2:40 p.m.Donald Trump posts online that Charlie Kirk has died.
Evening (~8:00 p.m.)Kirk’s body leaves Timpanogos Regional Hospital in a motorcade for transport to the state medical examiner.


🚗 Transport Summary

  • Carried by six men → placed into SUV → driven directly to Timpanogos Regional Hospital.
  • No reports of ambulance transport.
 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,665
Reputation
860
Daps
7,143

The question now becomes, is any of these excellent Black women allowed to defend themselves against the lies propagated against them?

Joy Reid did respond to this incident that took place sept 10.

🎓 Education + Career Achievements

PersonUndergraduateHonorsGraduate / LawHonorsCareer Milestones / “Firsts”
Michelle ObamaPrinceton University, B.A. in Sociology, 1985Cum laudeHarvard Law School, J.D., 1988– (Harvard Law doesn’t use Latin honors at that level)• First African American First Lady of the U.S. (2009–2017)• Advocate for education, girls’ rights, health (Let’s Move!, Reach Higher)• Best-selling author (Becoming)
Ketanji Brown JacksonHarvard College, A.B. in Government, 1992Magna cum laudeHarvard Law School, J.D., 1996Cum laude• First Black woman on the U.S. Supreme Court (2022– )• First former federal public defender to become a Justice
Joy ReidHarvard University, B.A. in Visual & Environmental Studies, 1991– (no record of honors)• First Black woman to host a major U.S. prime-time cable news show (The ReidOut, MSNBC, 2020– )• Author (Fracture, 2015)• Influential political commentator
Sheila Jackson LeeYale University, B.A. in Political Science, 1972With honorsUniv. of Virginia School of Law, J.D., 1975• Longest-serving Black woman in the U.S. House of Representatives (since 1995)• Advocate on civil rights, healthcare, and immigration• Known for leadership in the Congressional Black Caucus


✅ Each of these women graduated on merit, some with high honors, and went on to achieve historic firsts in American law, politics, or media.


ChatGTP, prompt: Do black pilots got in via DEI / Affirmative Action.

“There is no clear, publicly‐verified evidence that can say “Black pilots got in via DEI/Affirmative Action” in the sense of bypassing normal qualification or standards. But there are programs and goals designed to increase the number of Black pilots (and other under-represented groups) which might create more opportunities.”


ChatGTP, prompt: On what merit do Black pilots get hired?

“Black pilots — like all pilots — are hired on the basis of the same strict Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards and airline requirements.“

DEI / Affirmative Action distribution.

Let’s break it down by race + gender (since Affirmative Action affected them differently).

GroupEstimated Share of Affirmative Action BenefitsNotes
White women~70–75%The single largest beneficiary group. Gender-based Affirmative Action opened up careers, universities, and government positions historically closed to them.
Black women~10–12%Benefited from both race- and gender-based protections; seen as “double beneficiaries.”
Black men~5–8%Benefited from race-based Affirmative Action, though not from gender protections.
Hispanic/Latina women~3–5%Both gender and ethnicity protections helped, though impact smaller than for Black women.
Hispanic/Latino men~2–4%Race/ethnicity benefits but without gender-based boost.
Asian & Native American women<2%Localized or university-based benefits; less direct federal emphasis.
Asian & Native American men<2%Similar to above, often excluded or contested in admissions debates.
White menNot beneficiaries; in fact, the baseline groupHistorically the “default” workforce/university admissions category before Affirmative Action.
LGBTQ+ (Gay community, men & women)Indirect/Not formally quantifiedNot part of Affirmative Action law; benefits mostly via overlap with race/gender or later DEI/anti-discrimination expansions.

📌 Key takeaways:
  • White women → biggest winners overall.
  • Black women → gained more than Black men because they were covered under both race and gender.
  • Black men → significant gains, but less than women of color.
  • White men → baseline; they didn’t gain from Affirmative Action, but still remained dominant in many sectors.
  • LGBTQ+ → outside formal Affirmative Action, but increasingly included in modern DEI frameworks.
 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,665
Reputation
860
Daps
7,143

Let’s put this to rest.

Charlie Kirk vs. Jesus on Poor Children


TopicCharlie Kirk (Statements/Views)Jesus (Teachings/Actions)
View of Poor ChildrenHas mocked or spoken dismissively about poor children in political rhetoric (e.g., framing them as burdens or tied to “failed” social programs). Often aligns with a right-wing critique of welfare and redistribution.Declares: “Let the little children come to me” (Matthew 19:14). Jesus uplifted children as models of faith and innocence, never as burdens.
Responsibility Toward the PoorSuggests poverty is often the result of personal or cultural failure; emphasizes self-reliance, not systemic help.Commands direct care for the poor: “Whatever you did for the least of these, you did for me” (Matthew 25:40).
Systemic vs. PersonalOpposes large-scale redistribution programs; favors private charity or none at all.Calls for radical systemic transformation: the hungry filled, the rich sent away empty (Luke 1:53).
Tone & EthicMocking, adversarial, and dismissive toward poor children and families as part of “culture wars.”Compassionate, protective, and centering the poor and children as closest to God’s Kingdom.
SymbolismPoor children = example of dependency that should not be “rewarded” by government aid.Poor children = sacred, pure, beloved of God; to welcome them is to welcome God Himself (Mark 9:36–37).


📌
Summary
  • Charlie Kirk: frames poor children as burdens of failed systems; aligns with individualist, right-wing economic arguments.
  • Jesus: sees poor children as holy, precious, and central to the Kingdom of God; demands care, protection, and justice for them.
 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,665
Reputation
860
Daps
7,143


It’s funny how people expect Ilhan to honor Kirk when he would be trashing her online routinely

These folk at the far right live in a paradox.




 
Last edited:
Top