A lot of peope cant dont be talk good and therefore they are easily swayed by people that do. A lot of others dont have real opinions or actual understanding of anything so they will just hop on what seems edgy or contrary. Somehow these people have way more influence than they have any business having now.
I had never heard of dude before his death. Nothing I have heard suggests he was anything more than an internet troll. Yet now I cant get away from him. They really canonizing this dude. You can tell his OG Shapiro just hoping he can get shot/shot at and just not die so he can get in on this.
Would Jesus allow a 10-year-old girl who was raped to suffer further, the consistent message from the Gospels is clear: Jesus stood with the vulnerable, the abused, and the powerless — never with their oppressors.
Key points from Jesus’ teachings:
• Protection of Children: Jesus said, “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to stumble, it would be better for them to have a millstone tied around their neck and be drowned in the sea” (Matthew 18:6). This is one of his strongest condemnations — showing absolute seriousness about protecting children from harm.
• Compassion and Healing: He consistently showed compassion to those who suffered, whether through illness, oppression, or injustice.
• Justice for the Oppressed: His mission statement in Luke 4:18 was to bring good news to the poor, healing to the brokenhearted, and freedom to the oppressed.
ChatGPT prompt Would Jesus be for or against the Civil Rights Act?
1. Equality Before God
• Jesus broke social, ethnic, and gender barriers in his time. He spoke with Samaritans (a despised minority), elevated women, healed Gentiles, and welcomed outcasts.
• He taught that every human being bears God’s image and is equal in worth.
• This aligns directly with the Civil Rights Act’s core principle: no discrimination based on race, color, sex, or religion.
2. Defense of the Oppressed
• His mission was to “proclaim good news to the poor, freedom for the oppressed” (Luke 4:18).
• Jesus consistently sided with the marginalized — exactly the kind of people the Civil Rights Act sought to protect from systemic injustice.
3. Condemnation of Injustice
• He denounced the hypocrisy of religious and political elites who upheld systems of oppression.
• In the same way, the Civil Rights Act was a stand against systemic racism, segregation, and exploitation.
4. The Law of Love
• Jesus summarized God’s law as: “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Mark 12:31).
• Racism and segregation directly violate this command. The Civil Rights Act, by dismantling legalized segregation, is an expression of this principle.
Conclusion:
If applied to the 1960s context, Jesus would almost certainly have supported the Civil Rights Act. It represents justice for the oppressed, equality before God, and the dismantling of systemic discrimination — all themes central to his life and message.
Charlie Kirk and Poor Children vs. Jesus and Poor Children
In today’s political climate, voices like Charlie Kirk often speak about poor children through the lens of critique and dismissal. For Kirk, poverty is frequently framed as the result of personal failure or cultural weakness. Poor children are not symbols of innocence or need but evidence of what he portrays as broken systems — welfare dependence, failed policies, or communities that do not “take responsibility.” His rhetoric tends to mock or diminish the struggles of poor families, portraying them as burdens rather than as people deserving care. In this view, the solution is not communal or systemic aid, but rather personal grit and individual self-reliance.
By contrast, the teachings of Jesus turn this logic upside down. Jesus lifted up children, especially the poor and vulnerable, as the very embodiment of God’s Kingdom. “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the Kingdom of Heaven belongs to such as these” (Matthew 19:14). Where Kirk sees burdens, Jesus sees blessings. Where Kirk uses poor children as rhetorical props in a culture war, Jesus embraces them as sacred beings with inherent dignity.
For Jesus, the poor were not a symbol of weakness but the heart of his mission. “Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the Kingdom of God” (Luke 6:20). He insisted that care for the poor — including children — was the true measure of righteousness: “Whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me” (Matthew 25:40). In this vision, to feed, clothe, and protect poor children is to encounter God Himself.
The contrast is stark. Charlie Kirk’s worldview frames poverty as a problem to be criticized, often dismissing poor children as drains on society. Jesus’ vision, however, centers those very children as holy, beloved, and closest to the heart of God’s Kingdom. One uses them as evidence of failure; the other honors them as treasures of divine worth.
Jesus’ teachings strongly suggest he would have been for the Civil Rights Act and the broader struggle for racial justice. Here’s why:
Charlie Kirk vs. Jesus on Poor Children
| Topic | Charlie Kirk (Statements/Views) | Jesus (Teachings/Actions) |
| View of Poor Children | Has mocked or spoken dismissively about poor children in political rhetoric (e.g., framing them as burdens or tied to “failed” social programs). Often aligns with a right-wing critique of welfare and redistribution. | Declares: “Let the little children come to me” (Matthew 19:14). Jesus uplifted children as models of faith and innocence, never as burdens. |
| Responsibility Toward the Poor | Suggests poverty is often the result of personal or cultural failure; emphasizes self-reliance, not systemic help. | Commands direct care for the poor: “Whatever you did for the least of these, you did for me” (Matthew 25:40). |
| Systemic vs. Personal | Opposes large-scale redistribution programs; favors private charity or none at all. | Calls for radical systemic transformation: the hungry filled, the rich sent away empty (Luke 1:53). |
| Tone & Ethic | Mocking, adversarial, and dismissive toward poor children and families as part of “culture wars.” | Compassionate, protective, and centering the poor and children as closest to God’s Kingdom. |
| Symbolism | Poor children = example of dependency that should not be “rewarded” by government aid. | Poor children = sacred, pure, beloved of God; to welcome them is to welcome God Himself (Mark 9:36–37). |
Summary
- Charlie Kirk: frames poor children as burdens of failed systems; aligns with individualist, right-wing economic arguments.
- Jesus: sees poor children as holy, precious, and central to the Kingdom of God; demands care, protection, and justice for them.
