China & Russia are 'aggressively pursuing' hypersonic weapons, and the US can't defend against them

mson

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
56,625
Reputation
7,302
Daps
107,348
Reppin
NULL
China and Russia are 'aggressively pursuing' hypersonic weapons, and the US can't defend against them, top nuclear commander says
  • America's top nuclear commander said the U.S. doesn't have defenses against hypersonic weapons.
  • "Both Russia and China are aggressively pursuing hypersonic capabilities," said Gen. John Hyten, commander of U.S. Strategic Command.
  • Earlier this month, Russia announced a slew of new nuclear weapons as well as hypersonic missiles.
Amanda Macias | @amanda_m_macias
Published 4:13 PM ET Tue, 20 March 2018 Updated 11:59 AM ET Wed, 21 March 2018CNBC.com


China and Russia are pursuing hypersonic weapons — and the US can't defend against them 11:00 AM ET Wed, 21 March 2018 | 00:50

America's top nuclear commander described a grim scenario for U.S. forces facing off against a new breed of high-speed weapons that Russia and China are developing.

"We don't have any defense that could deny the employment of such a weapon against us," Air Force Gen. John Hyten, commander of U.S. Strategic Command, told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday. This means that, as of now, the U.S. has to rely on deterrence against these so-called hypersonic weapons, he said.


Yuri Gripas | Reuters
U.S. Air Force General John Hyten, Commander of U.S. Strategic Command, testifies in a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington.
Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., then asked the general to explain what a hypersonic weapon is and what it does.


"A hypersonic threat is a system that starts out ballistic, so you'll see it like a ballistic missile, but then it depresses the trajectory and flies more like a cruise missile or airplane," Hyten said. "It goes up into the lower reaches of space and turns immediately back down and then levels out."

At that point, Hyten said, the weapon will fly at very high speed, which is where the term hypersonic comes from.

"Both Russia and China are aggressively pursuing hypersonic capabilities," Hyten told Inhofe. "We've watched them test those capabilities."

While the Defense Department's latest budget request of $686 billion emphasizes a plan to offset emerging threats from Russia and China, it is clear that the U.S. lacks the means to combat hypersonics.


Damir Sagolj | Reuters
Chinese President Xi Jinping speaks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as leaders gather for a family photo during the Belt and Road Forum on Yanqi Lake, outside Beijing, China, May 15, 2017.
Hyten, who has previously called Russia the "most significant threat" to the U.S., emphasized the need for the U.S. to add another type of nuclear weapon to its arsenal.

"I strongly agree with the need for a low-yield nuclear weapon," he said of the Pentagon's request for a low-yield warhead for submarine-launched ballistic missiles. "That capability is a deterrence weapon to respond to the threat that Russia, in particular, is portraying. President [Vladimir] Putin announced as far back as April of 2000 that the Russian doctrine will be to use a low-yield nuclear weapon on the battlefield."

Hyten's comments came ahead of President Donald Trump's announcement that he plans to "get together in the not-too-distant future" with Putin in order to discuss the international arms race.

Earlier this month, during a two-hour state-of-the-nation speech, Putin announced a slew of new nuclear weapons as well as a hypersonic missile.

Putin's speech cited other nations' actions as a key factor in supercharging Russia's arsenal.

"I want to tell all those who have fueled the arms race over the last 15 years, sought to win unilateral advantages over Russia, introduced unlawful sanctions aimed to contain our country's development: All that you wanted to impede with your policies have already happened," Putin said. "You have failed to contain Russia."

The intercontinental hypersonic missile, dubbed Avangard, is capable of reaching targets at 20 times the speed of sound and will strike "like a fireball," Putin said.

China and Russia are pursuing hypersonic weapons — and the US can't defend against them
 

Alpha Male

Spare me your daps
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
2,264
Reputation
-2,281
Daps
5,317
I’m sure the same hypocrites who claim we spend too much on military and defense will be the first ones to lambast our govt and demand some kind of action.
 

Th3G3ntleman

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,862
Reputation
-2,731
Daps
54,595
Reppin
NULL
I’m sure the same hypocrites who claim we spend too much on military and defense will be the first ones to lambast our govt and demand some kind of action.

Are they hypocrites though? If we're spending that much more on the military and still aren't as capable as other countries who spend significantly less than there is a disconnect somewhere.
 

Alpha Male

Spare me your daps
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
2,264
Reputation
-2,281
Daps
5,317
Are they hypocrites though? If we're spending that much more on the military and still aren't as capable as other countries who spend significantly less than there is a disconnect somewhere.

Yes they’re hypocrites. If someone is the type that thinks we spend too much on defense... but also wants the US to be at the forefront of all technological innovation to better defend us... then yes that would make them hypocrites.

We’re very capable. Nobody is going to use any of these weapons on us and in time we will almost surely find a way to level the playing field.
 

Th3G3ntleman

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,862
Reputation
-2,731
Daps
54,595
Reppin
NULL
Yes they’re hypocrites. If someone is the type that thinks we spend too much on defense... but also wants the US to be at the forefront of all technological innovation to better defend us... then yes that would make them hypocrites.

We’re very capable. Nobody is going to use any of these weapons on us and in time we will almost surely find a way to level the playing field.

Sure but I think it's very damning that we spend by far the most in terms of military yet are in a position to be playing catch-up mode. The way we spend we should of already had the next weapon after this hyper-sonic shyt figured out and in production. I'm for military spending if it's effective and efficient....neither of which applies to our bloated spending habits.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
76,979
Reputation
9,320
Daps
230,806
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Are they hypocrites though? If we're spending that much more on the military and still aren't as capable as other countries who spend significantly less than there is a disconnect somewhere.

Corruption, unaccountable money, lots of fat on the budget...

The Chinese and Russians have been catching up... in the 1990s they were like 20 years behind.
 

Th3G3ntleman

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,862
Reputation
-2,731
Daps
54,595
Reppin
NULL
Corruption, unaccountable money, lots of fat on the budget...

The Chinese and Russians have been catching up... in the 1990s they were like 20 years behind.

Scary thing is these military hawks are gonna see the progress being made by foreign powers and guess what they're response is going to be? Spend more. Guess where they're gonna get the money for that? Yup cut more programs for middle class/lower class Americans. shyt's a perpetual motion of fukkery that's slowly going to rot the country to it's core.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
76,979
Reputation
9,320
Daps
230,806
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Scary thing is these military hawks are gonna see the progress being made by foreign powers and guess what they're response is going to be? Spend more. Guess where they're gonna get the money for that? Yup cut more programs for middle class/lower class Americans. shyt's a perpetual motion of fukkery that's slowly going to rot the country to it's core.

Yeah, its not sustainable though. Its cause we have the world reserve currency.

But these countries are trying to get out of the dollar system because they see it is the reason why we spend so much on military adventurism
 

Alpha Male

Spare me your daps
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
2,264
Reputation
-2,281
Daps
5,317
Sure but I think it's very damning that we spend by far the most in terms of military yet are in a position to be playing catch-up mode. The way we spend we should of already had the next weapon after this hyper-sonic shyt figured out and in production. I'm for military spending if it's effective and efficient....neither of which applies to our bloated spending habits.

i'm just saying it's reasons like this why we can't really afford to penny pinch on defense spending. you never know when other countries are going to maneuver like this.

obviously the govt has been very inefficient in the way they've spent that money, but that's not a surprise to anyone. i was just calling out the anti-military hypocrites we have here in our own country. the same ones that talk shyt and say we need to defund them are the same ones who would beg the govt to do something if we were ever vulnerable to an attack.
 

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
45,964
Reputation
4,631
Daps
101,579
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
Russia and China besides America need to figure out and control their population. China and Russia is due soon for massive protesting and other disturbances :troll:

Russia can’t feed themselves and China majority population is farm land underdeveloped. They can’t win a long lasting war
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
76,979
Reputation
9,320
Daps
230,806
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Russia and China besides America need to figure out and control their population. China and Russia is due soon for massive protesting and other disturbances :troll:

Russia can’t feed themselves and China majority population is farm land underdeveloped. They can’t win a long lasting war

Russia's agriculture sector has been booming in recent years and its not the USSR anymore.

They export more food than military equipment now.

From the Financial Times:

Russian agriculture sector flourishes amid sanctions
 
Top