Chris Paul or Steve Nash

[Lucky_Lefty]

Nash. Cause he's not a bytch like CP0

 

[Saint1]

Paul imo could lead any team you put him on to success where as Nash needs to be surrounded with the right talent to succeed

Every point guard has to be surrounded with talent. I'm pretty sure CP3 and the Rockets (last year) were the most talent laden out of both players careers.

 

[MikelArteta]

Nash

 

[MJ Truth]

Nah bruh. Nash ran the second 7 second or less offense with D’Antoni, they were always top in pace which means they got the most possessions per game. Rondo in his career has only twice l had a top team in pace. CP3 only once had a top 15 pace ranking. His teams were usually at the bottom interns of pace. There’s a correlation between pg overdribbling and pacing.

Nash and CP3 were not the same type of pgs

Nash and Paul are both of the “Let me keep the ball until I got a wide open teammate” variety AKA assist hunters, Nash played at a faster pace because of systems. I’m not even criticizing the style, because I’ve never had an issue with that type of ball. But let’s call it what it is.

 

[who_better_than_me]

Nash. Cause he's not a bytch like CP0

This seemed more like a emotional decision versus a rational one. Can’t accept it