Religion/Spirituality Christians come explain this

[the cac mamba]

Yet the Torah....is ......the first half of the Bible???

The Bible never said there weren't other gods (it in fact acknowledges their existence...but is clear they shouldn't be worshipped by Christians) the Bible in full is actually a history book, collection of stories, observations, prophecies and instructions from God for Christian (meaning those who accept Jesus as the son of God) living.

If you find "truth" in another text? Or overlapping text? Or unrelated text? Great! Just don't confuse those texts as a representation of Jesus or....what he represents. Doesn't make either text less true. ...

I'm not sure you've done the research to have this type of convo breh you spit common athiest rhetoric that appeals to a superficial sense of "logic"
...

what do you mean? if the bible is true, the the quran is wrong. ancient egyptians were wrong. etc etc etc

this is what you believe. its absolutely ridiculous

 

[Ayo]

but you KNOW being a human is exactly what you laid it out to be. ...

Thanks to BILLIONS of years of evolution.

 

[PeridotPuss]

Yea, that god is evil then.

Ridiculous statement

You create blood. ...are you blood? Or is that one substance you use to function properly?

You ejaculate. ...are you semen?

You speak. ..are you your words?

 

[Lamar Givens]

a death angel 900 year old men

Explain rationally as to why you think this would be inconceivable?

 

[Eddy Gordo]

fukk God

 

[the cac mamba]

Explain rationally as to why you think this would be inconceivable?

because life span has increased, not decreased, and no one lives to be 900 years old

"god sent a death angel"

 

[PeridotPuss]

what do you mean? if the bible is true, the the quran is wrong. ancient egyptians were wrong. etc etc etc

this is what you believe. its absolutely ridiculous

I said what I meant..... and was pretty clear that the Bible is the "truth" regarding Jesus....

You can't hang breh ....you're looking like a religion "troll" with no substantive athiest beliefs...no backup and no arguments

You make one unfounded statement...laugh and then pick another

I'm actually disappointed the way you talk on the Boards I thought you had that nonbelief heat. ...

 

[PeridotPuss]

Thanks to BILLIONS of years of evolution.

....doesn't address how odd it would sound to someone who didn't understand the basics of humanity...which was the point of my post

Whole quote and defend or....

 

[the cac mamba]

I said what I meant..... and was pretty clear that the Bible is the "truth" regarding Jesus....

You can't hang breh ....you're looking like a religion "troll" with no substantive athiest beliefs...no backup and no arguments

You make one unfounded statement...laugh and then pick another

I'm actually disappointed the way you talk on the Boards I thought you had that nonbelief heat. ...

first of all, your arguments all revert back to "jesus is real because of the bible. the bible is real because of god. god is real because i say so"

you know that there's only so many ways to address that, right it has absolutely zero substance

i mean lets be honest; are you willing to state that every muslim on earth is wrong about jesus? because the quran doesn't back up your precious bible

 

[Lamar Givens]

Thanks to BILLIONS of years of evolution.

Darwinian evolution is false. Random mutations driven by chance do not give rise to new complex biological structures.

The reason billions/millions of years are added to the theory is because everyone knows it's b.s.

Darwinian evolution relies on random mutations that are selected by a blind, unguided process of natural selection. This undirected process has no goals. Being random, it tends to harm organisms and does not improve them or build complexity. As biologist Lynn Margulis, a member of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences until her death in 2011, said: “New mutations don’t create new species; they create offspring that are impaired.”1 Similarly, the past president of the French Academy of Sciences, Pierre-Paul Grasse, contended that “[m]utations have a very limited ‘constructive capacity’” because “[n]o matter how numerous they may be, mutations do not produce any kind of evolution.”2

 

[Lamar Givens]

first of all, your arguments all revert back to "jesus is real because of the bible. the bible is real because of god. god is real because i say so"

you know that there's only so many ways to address that, right it has absolutely zero substance

i mean lets be honest; are you willing to state that every muslim on earth is wrong about jesus? because the quran doesn't back up your precious bible

The Quran is not accepted because it is not internally consistent.

 

[the cac mamba]

The Quran is not accepted because it is not internally consistent.

they're both fake

you probably have a 'king james bible' in your house

 

[Ayo]

Darwinian evolution is false. Random mutations driven by chance do not give rise to new complex biological structures.

The reason billions/millions of years are added to the theory is because everyone knows it's b.s.

Darwinian evolution relies on random mutations that are selected by a blind, unguided process of natural selection. This undirected process has no goals. Being random, it tends to harm organisms and does not improve them or build complexity. As biologist Lynn Margulis, a member of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences until her death in 2011, said: “New mutations don’t create new species; they create offspring that are impaired.”1 Similarly, the past president of the French Academy of Sciences, Pierre-Paul Grasse, contended that “[m]utations have a very limited ‘constructive capacity’” because “[n]o matter how numerous they may be, mutations do not produce any kind of evolution.”2

What B.S.? There's evidence that the Earth is BILLIONS of years old.

And why are we dismissing 99.9% of the scientific community now and citing a few on the fringe? How are they any more right than the majority?

 

[usopp]

Lol

Where are Iraqi Christians today? Syrian Christians?

Even Lebanon is majority Muslim now

Underground churches.

 

[Lamar Givens]

What B.S.? There's evidence that the Earth is BILLIONS of years old.

And why are we dismissing 99.9% of the scientific community now and citing a few on the fringe? How are they any more right than the majority?

1. Without millions and billions of years evolutionary theory falls apart.

2. Radiometric dating is flawed in many ways because a priori assumptions are made about the age of rocks.

3. The age of a rock cannot be directly measured.

4. 99% of the scientific community, that is the fallacy of appeal to authority.

5. I notice you will not deal with the problems of evolution, namely blind chance, and mutations, in addition to New Complex Biological Structures arising from a blind unguided process.

6. I'm used to this when the facts are laid bare though.