There will definitely be a streaming service surcharge, I mean Tier, coming soon.RIP cutting cable
The US government placing itself as the regulator for the internet is all net neutrality did and I think that is worse that ISPs charging for tiered service.Net Neutrality was a huge win for the general public and private individuals looking to create product in the IoT era.
How's that?The US government placing itself as the regulator for the internet is all net neutrality did and I think that is worse that ISPs charging for tiered service.
IMHO
Government regulation of internet over private regulation isn't preferable to me, since I view government regulation as stiffling to innovation, in the bed of business, and i generally find the government has no right to dictate to ISPs how to filter traffic that they contract over their networksHow's that?
The US government placing itself as the regulator for the internet is all net neutrality did and I think that is worse that ISPs charging for tiered service.
IMHO
This is one of the major things i disagree with conservatives aboutGovernment regulation of internet over private regulation isn't preferable to me, since I view government regulation as stiffling to innovation, in the bed of business, and i generally find the government has no right to dictate to ISPs how to filter traffic that they contract over their networks
They have the right because it is the right of the peopleGovernment regulation of internet over private regulation isn't preferable to me, since I view government regulation as stiffling to innovation, in the bed of business, and i generally find the government has no right to dictate to ISPs how to filter traffic that they contract over their networks
That doesn't seem bad to me at all and again it all relies on what you contract.That sounds great until you see Microsoft form a partnership with provider A to allow preferential treatment to its cloud services while Amazon teams up with Provider B and google in the interest of building onto it's cloud business slows or places other restrictions on cloud services outside of its umbrella despite highly, or Verizon FiOS customers, despite using a heavily government subsidized product Don't have the freedom to stream HD content from HULU because they have a partnership with Amazon.
Nothing bad came out of net neutrality unless you view zero-rating as a product that works in a vacuum or want to restrict access to information.
Well I'm not a conservative.This is one of the major things i disagree with conservatives about
The government needs to be involved with regulating the internet
No internet isn't a right of the people. this is absurd, its a paid for service. Like cable, cell phones, and etc.They have the right because it is the right of the people
Government regulation = free and open internet
Private regulation = companies dictating what you can and can't access and gouging you for profit
Sometimes you have to take a step back from your instinctual party talking points and use some common sense
Meaning once you pay for internet access, you can access the entire internet, in the same way that you dont have to pay the phone company one charge to call your family and a separate one to call your friends. That's essentially what they want to do by eliminating net neutrality.No internet isn't a right of the people. this is absurd, its a paid for service. Like cable, cell phones, and etc.
government regulation =/= free and open internet it means government controlled internet.
Sometimes you have to let go of the pie in the sky, free lunch mindset with regard to the government and realize who you are dealing with.