Clippers without CP3 = 2011 Bobcats

[Tony D'Amato]

They lost to the Pacers with Paul

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

So your simple ass wants to bump the thread when they beat the worst teams in the league but get mad when it gets bumped after they lose to good ones?

Do you see the premise of the thread? It clearly says Clippers without CP3 = 2011 Bobcats.

2011 Bobcats = 7-59 record, they are pretty much one of the worst teams in history. The leading scorer on that team was Gerald Henderson. They were not only getting blown out by good teams they were getting blown out by bad teams too.

Clippers without Paul = 5-2 record, they are pretty much nearly equalled the Bobcats season wins in about 1/10th of the games. They have two 20+ PPG scorers on this team since Paul's out.

Pacers have lost 1 game at home this season. They still probably would've lost if Paul was playing. This thread is stupid and you're stupid too.

http://espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400489122 - lets not act like the Clips (at home) didn't lose to the Pacers when they had CP3 earlier this season.

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

Do you see the premise of the thread? It clearly says Clippers without CP3 = 2011 Bobcats.

2011 Bobcats = 7-59 record, they are pretty much one of the worst teams in history. The leading scorer on that team was Gerald Henderson. They were not only getting blown out by good teams they were getting blown out by bad teams too.

Clippers without Paul = 5-2 record, they are pretty much nearly equalled the Bobcats season wins in about 1/10th of the games. They have two 20+ PPG scorers on this team since Paul's out.

Pacers have lost 1 game at home this season. They still probably would've lost if Paul was playing. This thread is stupid and you're stupid too.

http://espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400489122 - lets not act like the Clips (at home) didn't lose to the Pacers when they had CP3 earlier this season.

Obvious hyperbole :lolbama: I can tell by the neg that your simple ass is furious right now, so just answer two questions.

1) Are the Clippers BETTER without Chris Paul?

2) If not, how vital is he to their success, scale of 1 to 10?

 

[Consigliere]

They lost to the Pacers with Paul

Did they get blown out?













Nope. They lost a close game by 5. It was competitive.

Cuz their a better team with Paul than without him.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Obvious hyperbole :lolbama: I can tell by the neg that your simple ass is furious right now, so just answer two questions.

1) Are the Clippers BETTER without Chris Paul?

2) If not, how vital is he to their success, scale of 1 to 10?

Your dumb ass had to ask - "so your simple ass wants to bump the thread when they beat the worst teams in the league but get mad when it gets bumped after they lose to good ones?" - like it isn't obvious how idiotic this thread is in the first place?

It's not a hyperbole, stop it with the dumb shyt, there's no truths attached to it to even suggest it is. OP got giddy off one game, he wouldn't have made it if he knew they'd go on to win 5 straight games.

Why do you ask questions you already know the answers to? I'm beginning to think there's something wrong with the functioning of your brain.

Its the Lakers

Oh don't get me wrong, I don't believe they're better off in the playoffs without him, but this game and the last 2 illustrate how better off they'd be if Paul played to the strengths of his players and not to his own strengths. His game forces square players in round holes.

This is another clear case of you not being able to differentiate between what is actually said.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Did they get blown out?













Nope. They lost a close game by 5. It was competitive.

Cuz their a better team with Paul than without him.

No shyt. It still gives you no reason to bump this thread. They just won 5 straight. Bobcats won 7 for the entire season. All you did by bumping this was make the OP look stupid AGAIN.

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

Your dumb ass had to ask - "so your simple ass wants to bump the thread when they beat the worst teams in the league but get mad when it gets bumped after they lose to good ones?" - like it isn't obvious how idiotic this thread is in the first place?

It's not a hyperbole, stop it with the dumb shyt, there's no truths attached to it to even suggest it is. OP got giddy off one game, he wouldn't have made it if he knew they'd go on to win 5 straight games.

Why do you ask questions you already know the answers to? I'm beginning to think there's something wrong with the functioning of your brain.




This is another clear case of you not being able to differentiate between what is actually said.

Hey dummy, answer the questions or just shut the fukk up. Im not interested in your extra bs.

Scale of 1-10, lets hear it.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Hey dummy, answer the questions or just shut the fukk up. Im not interested in your extra bs.

Scale of 1-10, lets hear it.

fukk your questions.

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

fukk your questions.

:vince: