nikkas be so outraged when someone doesn't share a similar opinion. It's how he feels. It is what it is. Jordan's competitive nature would make me choose him over Bron but there is no correct answer except the one you choose.
Ion think that’s his point
The issue is you dustheads make it seem like nobody would take Bron from prior generations


Taking anybody over Jordan is foolish IMO
I don't know if Clyde's guilty of it, but I notice a lot players from yesteryear(60's 70's 80's) use Bron as
a buffer to hate on MJ

Stuff like this always comes down to the type of team you want to build.
Both dominant.
I suppose that the SG position historically has been weaker than the SF. So from a positional scarcity perspective you may be inclined to take Jordan. However, few SF have the versatility of Lebron.
Debating who is greater and who you would take if building a team are different arguments.
Edit - on the other hand you probably would have to calculate just how important a strong SG correlates to winning vs other positions (ex elite catchers are scarce but don’t correlate to wins as much as, say elite CF). It’s not a simple argument.
This is the best response in this thread. I wonder how much Clyde as a fan hated Mike back in the day too when thinking about the classic Knicks slaughters and Bulls rivalries. Does that play a role? Bron and the Knicks don’t have that same competitive history.He'd also pick a baggy leopard suit over a well tailored black one, that doesn't make him right![]()
Exactly. Deez nikkas is fukkin retarded. nikka said "old nikkas pick LeBron as a form of hatin on Jordan"nikkas be so outraged when someone doesn't share a similar opinion. It's how he feels. It is what it is. Jordan's competitive nature would make me choose him over Bron but there is no correct answer except the one you choose.



You aren’t smart enough to grasp this concept, I see.
Shame.
