Florida beat OU by two TDs, they beat yall by like 30Last title game was 6 years ago.
The hate is deeper than that. Otherwise, people would constantly stay shytting on Oklahoma, which has played worse in BCS games and title games, getting stomped worse than OSU against Florida.
Let's stop pretending like games from years ago have any effect on this year.
So the USC-Oklahoma game never happened?Florida beat OU by two TDs, they beat yall by like 30
He said florida tho, and OU came within a TD of beating LSU and 2 within FLA
No..fukk OSU pretending ass coming out of the most overrated conference in CFB.
USC dominated college football living in the weak ass Pac 10.
fukk you. You fakkits bringing up OU like you cornballs are being treated unfairly.You clearly don't respond to facts, do you? Get your reading glasses on you old fakkit.
And the fukk you talking about overrated for? Nobody is talking about the Big 10 being the top right now. Even Big 10 fans know the Big 10 is down. Nevertheless, simply because a conference is weak doesn't make a team weak. USC dominated college football living in the weak ass Pac 10.
Oh we agree on the fact the system is completely flawed...it's why the BCS isn't going to exist after this yearFrankly, the whole ranking system is shyt. It's really impossible to know who is worthy. We could run through the Top 25 and find teams where we could ask, who the hell did they play?
So let's say OSU goes to play MSU and blasts them. According to the standard "how many ranked teams" argument we all make, that'd be a + for OSU. However, I could easily say, so what?
MSU beat OOC Western Michigan, South Florida, Youngstown State, and lost to Notre Dame. They played in the same weak Big 10. Why are they even #11? I'd speculate we could do that with a lot of teams. How do we prove they're a top 11 team in the country to this point? Most teams play nobody OOC and move up by winning in their conference, having a better shot if they finished strong the year before, so they start with a better ranking.
I really don't know if OSU (if they beat MSU) is one of the best two teams in the country. And I don't know if Auburn is either. This is why we need playoffs because a team like OSU shouldn't be denied a shot at a championship for doing everything right, but neither should Auburn, who might be the better team, despite having a hiccup in their season.
Also, some of those arguments you use to prove a point about USC are flawed. Example, you mention 2003 USC beating a Top 10 Auburn 23-0, but Auburn finished 8-5 and looks like unranked.
ANNNDDD I don't give a fukk nikka
It's simpleFrankly, the whole ranking system is shyt. It's really impossible to know who is worthy. We could run through the Top 25 and find teams where we could ask, who the hell did they play?
So let's say OSU goes to play MSU and blasts them. According to the standard "how many ranked teams" argument we all make, that'd be a + for OSU. However, I could easily say, so what?
MSU beat OOC Western Michigan, South Florida, Youngstown State, and lost to Notre Dame. They played in the same weak Big 10. Why are they even #11? I'd speculate we could do that with a lot of teams. How do we prove they're a top 11 team in the country to this point? Most teams play nobody OOC and move up by winning in their conference, having a better shot if they finished strong the year before, so they start with a better ranking.
I really don't know if OSU (if they beat MSU) is one of the best two teams in the country. And I don't know if Auburn is either. This is why we need playoffs because a team like OSU shouldn't be denied a shot at a championship for doing everything right, but neither should Auburn, who might be the better team, despite having a hiccup in their season.
Also, some of those arguments you use to prove a point about USC are flawed. Example, you mention 2003 USC beating a Top 10 Auburn 23-0, but Auburn finished 8-5 and looks like unranked.
