COLI Fantasy Baseball Keeper League Discussion

do you agree to the new keeper rules listed below?


  • Total voters
    10

FaygoMI

All Star
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,698
Reputation
80
Daps
3,376
LOL at Kev :umad:

Back to the drawing board.... Has anyone traded for a rental yet? No set value, oh well...


Not giving a one for Reyes coming off an ankle injury....

~~~~EDIT~~~~~

How has Nava worked out? and thanks for Edwin, I'll be sure to keep him for next year! :ufdup:

:blessed:
 

Kang Deezy

Overall Nice Guy
Bushed
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
20,654
Reputation
-8,079
Daps
20,242
Reppin
The stoop with dat dope fanny padding
LOL at Kev :umad:

Back to the drawing board.... Has anyone traded for a rental yet? No set value, oh well...


Not giving a one for Reyes coming off an ankle injury....

Strasburg himself is worth a 3rd for a rental but @DANJA turned down a 3rd and a 6th from me just for Strasburg

Countered with 1st and 4th
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FaygoMI

All Star
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,698
Reputation
80
Daps
3,376
Strasburg himself is worth a 3rd for a rental but @DANJA turned down a 3rd and a 6th from me just for Strasburg

Countered with 1st and 4th

:usure:

Strasburg is a name......

at least 10 pitchers better RIGHT NOW
 
Last edited by a moderator:

HHR

Do what you love
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
19,023
Reputation
1,653
Daps
39,423
Well, that makes sense...he WAS the one trumpeting Castro 2 years ago

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
 

Kang Deezy

Overall Nice Guy
Bushed
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
20,654
Reputation
-8,079
Daps
20,242
Reppin
The stoop with dat dope fanny padding
I just got an offer that was slightly tempting but not willing to pay the price. Sad part is this stupid league probably vetoes it anyways.

Set such a bad precedent that it'll be really tough for anybody big names to get traded for picks.
 

Listen

Tell me moar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,692
Reputation
1,487
Daps
22,912
Reppin
A few Floors Down from the Daily Grind
I just got an offer that was slightly tempting but not willing to pay the price. Sad part is this stupid league probably vetoes it anyways.

Set such a bad precedent that it'll be really tough for anybody big names to get traded for picks.

Big names for picks aren't the problem,it's the fact you can't keep a bunch of first rounders if you don't have matching picks.

Hence why I'm not trading my first because I only have one and im not about to drop Miggy. You definitely won't get above a players round unless hes a young keeper.
 

Kang Deezy

Overall Nice Guy
Bushed
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
20,654
Reputation
-8,079
Daps
20,242
Reppin
The stoop with dat dope fanny padding
Big names for picks aren't the problem,it's the fact you can't keep a bunch of first rounders if you don't have matching picks.

Hence why I'm not trading my first because I only have one and im not about to drop Miggy. You definitely won't get above a players round unless hes a young keeper.

It's not that...

But is a first rounder for two rentals really vetoable? It shouldn't be.

If you have a first round keeper like Cabrera obviously you keep it, but if you don't have a first round keeper, what's the true value?

At the back end of the 1st round in the next draft, you're looking at players who'd go in the second or third round of a normal draft.

Who is the first pick that red and bergin are tanking for? Bryce Harper? :lolbron:
 

HHR

Do what you love
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
19,023
Reputation
1,653
Daps
39,423
It's not that...

But is a first rounder for two rentals really vetoable? It shouldn't be.

If you have a first round keeper like Cabrera obviously you keep it, but if you don't have a first round keeper, what's the true value?

At the back end of the 1st round in the next draft, you're looking at players who'd go in the second or third round of a normal draft.

Who is the first pick that red and bergin are tanking for? Bryce Harper? :lolbron:

I actually kind of agree with you about setting a bad precedent with the recent vetoes.

The Red trade was absurd because it was a shytty trade for Red...but I mean, I don't think it was collusion......and this Faygo trade probably shouldn't have been vetoed either.

Now, I voted against both of them, but now I wish I hadn't. I don't like the precedent we've set :shaq2:
 
Top