Here is an action for you. I say the term (to speak is a verb so it's an action) in the context of directing it at someone who has that skin of that color. I am clearly not using said term as a complement but instead as an insult. I have now turned a skin color into an insult and because said skin color is now used as an insult that implies some sort of inferiority to it if it is indented to be insulting to them.
No. An insult doesn't imply inferiority.
With every post you make up some scenario to read extra meaning into words in order to support your stance.
If you want to call someone out on their actions then call them out on their actions. If they're a racist then call them that if they're a bigot then call them that. That actually addresses their actions instead of taking the color of their skin and saying it to them as if it's intended to be insulting.
Two things at play here.
KKK member doesn't like me because the color of my skin. Doesn't need me to open my mouth. Doesn't need to know anything about me. He hates me.
I call said KKK member a cac. It's cause his actions and his opinions on me. I acknowledged his race in my stament because he already hates me for my skin color. You can't ask me to ignore race, when the only reason for the exchange is race in the first place.
My disdain for him isn't cause of his skin color, I don't have any ill feelings for him until AFTER he opens his mouth or shows me his actions. I don't categorize all white people as such, nore do I think anything is "inherent to white genes"(as if that makes any sense in the first place)
If you can't understand the difference between these situations then I don't have anything I could tell you.