uhhhhh YOU have.I dont think anyone has expressed outrage or disappointment in the reduction in teen pregnancy/abortion, or has stated that this reduction is a bad thing in anyway... no need to reach.
Colorado offered free birth control — and teen births fell by 40 percent
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
this is a generalization of the issue and a strawman at the same time
you are so weak:zfg:
If you guys dont think removing parental consent for minors marginalizes parents in any way so be it, im not gonna argue it. We will just agree to disagree...
More over the 'IMO' in my post stand for 'in my opinion'.I'm not stating my position as a fact or objective truth, nor am I asking you to agree with it.
you of all people should know how restrictions and sanctions work, due do to the nature of it's ability to inhibit the free market....In this case if teenagers want to fukk, they will find a way, regardless. This just helps ensure one less baby will not be born in a state of poverty or before the consenting individuals are ready to support a family.
And smh at the last part
Dawg you should be in public relations for the GOP and Libertarians, the way you try be politically correct and take no blame on the issue. This right here is like a subliminal Jay-Z diss but in form of public relations
How so?this is a generalization of the issue and a strawman at the same time
you are so weak:zfg:
The effectiveness of the policy was never in question, nor the reasoning behind it.
In this case if teenagers want to fukk, they will find a way, regardless. This just helps ensure one less baby will not be born in a state of poverty or before the consenting individuals are ready to support a family.
We just disagree on whether the benefit, outweighs the cost.
There seems to be this argument being made up that the children wont f*ck regardless, or that the same success can be achieved with parent consent... neither argument has been made. Could you quote wher eI made these claims?
I think this is a great thing, I just wish parents could be in the loop as clearly stated before... and yes I know this success can't be achieved with them in the loop.Whats so aggravating about that?
I really dont get how none of you get the "would like parents involved position"
NZA
LOL
Mom: isn't it strange that Chelsea isn't pregnant yet?
Dad: I was just thinking about this the other day. I know she might be getting her back blown out but she seems to be avoiding the eventual planting of the seed.
Mom: you don't think she went behind our backs and got on some sort of birth control do u?
Dad:...... That little sneak of a brat. I knew she was keeping us out of the loop. I want her off that birth control immediately! Call that little bytch down here! Teach her to prevent ruining her life without our consent.
Whats so aggravating about that?
I really dont get how none of you get the "would like parents involved position"
You seem to be implying that the program is flawed because it doesn't keep parents in the loop... you want the govt. to help improve communication between children and parents... doesn't sound very libertarian to me
You seem to be implying that the program is flawed because it doesn't keep parents in the loop... you want the govt. to help improve communication between children and parents... doesn't sound very libertarian to me
Well played.I cant say what I actually think.
Your shytty opinions get ripped to shreds, so you go "fukk it, time for the CACspiracy trump card!"
So fukking cowardly
The ends justify the means I guess.
Digga38
The seperation between what's fake and what's real
Your shytty opinions get ripped to shreds, so you go "fukk it, time for the CACspiracy trump card!"
So fukking cowardly
What is the end result? CACs dont run shyt the JOOs do