Colorado's Buffs offensive coordinator needs to be investigated

[Left.A1]

My inference has been pretty clear this entire time how is it possible you're concerned about my compression here

My general point was that one side of the field has been non competitive all year (sans one game), yet that coordinator is not catching the heat relative to his unit's performance

The defense being non competitive all year is why their offense was impotent all first half and is why he mismanaged them clock on their last drive Huh?



Observers in the game threads have been calling for Kelly’s job for weeks already … what on earth are you even talking about?

 

[KneeGrow.]

The defense being non competitive all year is why their offense was impotent all first half and is why he mismanaged them clock on their last drive Huh?



Observers in the game threads have been calling for Kelly’s job for weeks already … what on earth are you even talking about?

Good

Let's have this discussion in the "Buff's defensive coordinator needs to be investigated" thread next time

 

[Left.A1]

Good

Let's have this discussion in the "Buff's defensive coordinator needs to be investigated" thread next time

The fukk does it matter if it’s a dedicated thread or not … the commentary is the same you mad about the thread? Huh


Bottom line is this offense has been inconsistent and impotent in the first half of several games this year and that directly has hurt their ability to control games cleanly.. it’s been mentioned to the press several times y their head coach and is certainly worth criticizing based k n that alone

 

[KneeGrow.]

The fukk does it matter if it’s a dedicated thread or not … the commentary is the same you mad about the thread? Huh


Bottom line is this offense has been inconsistent and impotent in the first half of several games this year and that directly has hurt their ability to control games cleanly.. it’s been mentioned to the press several times y their head coach and is certainly worth criticizing based k n that alone

It's the impetus for my post that started our back and forth

 

[Left.A1]

It's the impetus for my post that started our back and forth

The impetus that you didn’t know people where already calling for the DCs job because you don’t read? Huh?

 

[KneeGrow.]

The impetus that you didn’t know people where already calling for the DCs job because you don’t read? Huh?

That's what you took from that?

 

[Left.A1]

That's what you took from that?

That’s what you wrote Huh?

 

[KneeGrow.]

That’s what you wrote Huh?

My initial post was more a critique of the generally reactionary nature that come along with analysis. So, yes, in a thread calls out one coordinator for end of game management while nary a mention of a coordinator that hasn't even been mediocre; I'll note the absurdity of that

For the retort to that to be "well he should've produced more than 48" is absurd to me, especially in this thread. It makes the point for me.

I'll make this more succinct; Charles Kelly is the reason they lost that game. I'm posting in a thread that calls out a coordinator that's not Charles Kelly. One coordinator's name trended after the game and it wasn't Charles Kelly. Anything that isn't criticizing Charles Kelly first and foremost is stinky analysis.

 

[Left.A1]

My initial post was more a critique of the generally reactionary nature that come along with analysis. So, yes, in a thread calls out one coordinator for end of game management while nary a mention of a coordinator that hasn't even been mediocre; I'll note the absurdity of that

Which is a perspective only applicable to those ignorant of the already existing conversation about the coordinator on the other side of the ball

For the retort to that to be "well he should've produced more than 48" is absurd to me, especially in this thread. It makes the point for me.

It’s not absurd and the only point you’re actually making is that you didn’t watch the game and are analyzing based on the final final box score that made it look closer than it was ..as if you did actually watch you would have understand how much the flow of the game was stagnant due to CU’s offense and their inability to be effective for nearly an entire half of football.. hence the critiques

I'll make this more succinct; Charles Kelly is the reason they lost that game. I'm posting in a thread that calls out a coordinator that's not Charles Kelly. One coordinator's name trended after the game and it wasn't Charles Kelly. Anything that isn't criticizing Charles Kelly first and foremost is stinky analysis.

Anyone who watched that game and can’t comprehend why their offensive coordinator is getting criticized is obviously providing stinky analysis as well …again their own head coach made simlar complaints about the offense in his own post game presser …was he offering “stinky analysis” too?

 

[KneeGrow.]

Which is a perspective only applicable to those ignorant of the already existing conversation about the coordinator on the other side of the ball

It’s not absurd and the only point you’re actually making is that you didn’t watch the game and are analyzing based on the final final box score that made it look closer than it was ..as if you did actually watch you would have understand how much the flow of the game was stagnant due to CU’s offense and their inability to be effective for nearly an entire half of football.. hence the critiques

Anyone who watched that game and can’t comprehend why their offensive coordinator is getting criticized is obviously providing stinky analysis as well …again their own head coach made simlar complaints about the offense in his own post game presser …was he offering “stinky analysis” too?

1st bold: Not in this thread. Where I posted my critique. Which is why I posted the critique in this thread.

2nd bold: It is absurd, because...

3rd bold: my point isn't that the offense is above critique. My point that for *this* thread to appear precisely after a failed onside kick, is ridiculous. This is the Sean Lewis thread. There was not a Charles Kelly thread. That's why it's absurd

What'd the head coach say about the defense and the coordinator he hired?

 

[Left.A1]

1st bold: Not in this thread. Where I posted my critique. Which is why I posted the critique in this thread.

Again all you’re doing here with this explanation is reinforcing the fact that you were ignorant to the preexisting conversation around a topic you thought you were introducing to people in this thread

2nd bold: It is absurd, because...

3rd bold: my point isn't that the offense is above critique…..

This is where you should have left it

What'd the head coach say about the defense and the coordinator he hired?

What does that have to do with what he said about the ineptness of the offense in the first half? Huh? which again if you actually watched these games instead of the box score you would know has been a running theme with this team … if the head foootball coach is literally introducing this conversation into the public discourse himself …i find it rather absurd to try to make some contrarian complaint about general observers doing the exact …same… thing ….

 

[Gully Bull]

Y’all abusing the fukk out of that smilie

 

[KneeGrow.]

Again all you’re doing here with this explanation is reinforcing the fact that you were ignorant to the preexisting conversation around a topic you thought you were introducing to people in this thread

This is where you should have left it


What does that have to do with what he said about the ineptness of the offense in the first half? Huh? which again if you actually watched these games instead of the box score you would know has been a running theme with this team … if the head foootball coach is literally introducing this conversation into the public discourse himself …i find it rather absurd to try to make some contrarian complaint about general observers doing the exact …same… thing ….

What'd he say about the defense?

The only thing I introduced was my opinion on how empty the analysis around the game is.

I considered the thread topic, preexisting discussions be damned. Much like OP had the right to be reactionary, I can be reactionary to the reactionary

 

[Rigby.]

I had to dip to watch our games after it got to 34-48 and they failed to convert on a 4th down. I knew it was gonna be some fukkery after I dipped

 

[North of Death]

clock keeps running after first downs and out of bounds so they were just playing for the onside kick...simple