That ain't a far comparison either considering the number of minimum salary RBs on rosters bringing the average down. Compare starting RBs versus K for a more apples to apples comparison.
Well that's not why its not a fair comparison. It's not a fair comparison because a minimum salary running back is expected to run the football, to block in pass protection, and to catch the football, where as a kicker is expected to...kick.
So how is it a nfl team can say "we will only pay you the minimum amount of money that we can to run, block, and catch" but they do not seem to be willing to say "we will only pay you the minimum amount of money to kick?"
Are there any kickers making the league minimum salary?
Furthermore...the kicker cannot even perform his job task until either the minimum league running back fails to do his job, equaling a punt...only does his job adequately...equaling a field goal attempt...or does his job exceptionally well...equaling an extra point.
Something is out of whack when the position that has to do work in several areas to even get the kicker in a position to do his job can make less than the kicker who relies on literally everyone else to even do his job.
And the comparing starting running backs to kickers doesn't make any sense because what is a "starting running back?" Zeke and Pollard were in Dallas together last year. Zeke started the games, Pollard got enough counting stats to make the pro bowl and Zeke didn't. Who's the starter? Against the 49ers Zeke started the game but as soon as Pollard got hurt the cowboys couldn't move the ball at all. Who's the starter? Zeke had multiple games where he couldn't even average 3 yards a carry and Pollard was top 5 in yards per carry. Who's the starter?
And before you say well obviously Pollard if he is getting more yards a better average more catches more touchdowns. What I would say to that is Ezekiel Elliot salary was 12 million dollars and Tony Pollard salary was 965,000 dollars. Who's the starter?
That's actual insane when you think about it. Tony Pollard was top 5 in yards per carry, is known for ripping off explosive plays, and the Dallas Cowboys, who had a top 8 offense, could not even function when he got hurt. They could legit not consistently get 30 yards of offense before having to punt. He was a pro bowler. He didn't even clear 1 million dollars in salary
Now I got to go look up pro bowlers salaries. Interested to see how many can I find that didn't even make a million the year they were a pro bowler.
Edit: Huntley made it as an alternate last year and he aint even make 800k. Pretty ironic that the only recent player I can find who made less than Pollard to be a pro bowler is a quarterback
