Come in and test your knowledge brehs
We'll have to agree to disagree breh
You're assuming the 2 events are independent ( the theft and buying $70 in goods) when there's no indication that they are.
The $70 goods=/= $70 cash to the owner
Owner is out $30 cash plus $70 worth of goods. That's the simplest answer. You would have to make further assumptions to extrapolate that to be $100 cash. Only way the owner is out the $70 in cash is if that's what the goods cost HIM.
Lets say this: What if the thief stole $30 in cash plus goods that you later ring up to be worth $70, is that the same as him stealing $100 cash? I'm guessing you think it is, thus our fundamental disagreement.
the owner is out 30 in cash, 70 in goods. we agree.
The 100 is if you equate goods to cash. I'm not disagreeing with you
We'll have to agree to disagree breh
You're assuming the 2 events are independent ( the theft and buying $70 in goods) when there's no indication that they are.
The $70 goods=/= $70 cash to the owner
Owner is out $30 cash plus $70 worth of goods. That's the simplest answer. You would have to make further assumptions to extrapolate that to be $100 cash. Only way the owner is out the $70 in cash is if that's what the goods cost HIM.
Lets say this: What if the thief stole $30 in cash plus goods that you later ring up to be worth $70, is that the same as him stealing $100 cash? I'm guessing you think it is, thus our fundamental disagreement.
The homey paid for the goods fair and square bruh!
That's literally what he said, b.We'll have to agree to disagree breh
You're assuming the 2 events are independent ( the theft and buying $70 in goods) when there's no indication that they are.
The $70 goods=/= $70 cash to the owner
Owner is out $30 cash plus $70 worth of goods. That's the simplest answer. You would have to make further assumptions to extrapolate that to be $100 cash. Only way the owner is out the $70 in cash is if that's what the goods cost HIM.
Lets say this: What if the thief stole $30 in cash plus goods that you later ring up to be worth $70, is that the same as him stealing $100 cash? I'm guessing you think it is, thus our fundamental disagreement.
Fade Runner 2049
Veteran
You brehs need to take a business class. All items in stores are insured. So now that you know that info. Re calculate how much the owner lost, a little bit of common sense goes along way.
NoChillJones
Banned
He was already out of 100 though...so he basically gave it l away for nothing...he recouped his own 70 dollars...but GAINED NOTHING...had the man not stole the money he would have profited 70 but he lost the product plus 39
It does change..dude is already in the negative...plus he looses the 70 worth of product...he gained nothing...got hit for 100 plus gave away 70 dollars worth of food. He made no profit. Lost 70 in product and 30 in cash...you can't claim a profit from money that was yours in the first place...
NoChillJones
Banned
He doesn't know they were technically stolen.
Fade Runner 2049
Veteran
He will when he checks the inventory and counts his drawer breh
NoChillJones
Banned
He will when he checks the inventory and counts his drawer breh
Technicalities are cop outs breh...
He's going to list in one of his sales report that he got 70 dollars which is an error and he essentially just gave 30 from the regisistar
Physically he gave away 30$ but fiscally he'll accure 170$ in losses cause he also lost 70 worth of merch
Physically he gave away 30$ but fiscally he'll accure 170$ in losses cause he also lost 70 worth of merch
25YOUTHS!!
Superstar
Naw he's saying owner is out the $100 cash. I'm saying $30 cash plus $70 in goods. The argument is whether the two statements are equal.
The $30 cash is a constant, but the $70 in goods is a variable depending the perspective.
If the thief gets robbed later on that day for the $70 in goods, hes out $70 cash b/c that's what he paid for it, but the original store owner is out the $70 minus markup.
See my first post that he quoted
A buck
SpacelySprockets
Veteran
coli mathematicians
Johnny Kilroy
79 points in 1 quarter
On the surface he lost $100 (can't believe people are actually struggling with this 
)
But what about time? Effort? Man hours? Lost sleep? He's gonna no doubt question his employees which could lower their morale, being accused of theft. He's gonna have to invest in a better security system as well. Maybe a few "Black Owned" signs. All in all, I'd say he comes out $2,500 in the hole.
)But what about time? Effort? Man hours? Lost sleep? He's gonna no doubt question his employees which could lower their morale, being accused of theft. He's gonna have to invest in a better security system as well. Maybe a few "Black Owned" signs. All in all, I'd say he comes out $2,500 in the hole.