
Hmmm, this leaves me more confused, all the things he said as the definition of MCing is stuff that describes rappers like E-40 (saying fly shyt, stuff you wouldnt think of to rhyme about, colourful descriptive language in the rhymes) and as has been pointed out so many times by elite Brooklyn MCs such as The Notorious Biggie Smalls and AZ, premiere basketball players of their era such as Rasheed Wallace and legendary DJs and radio personalities Funkmaster Flex and Peter Rosenburg, E-40 most certainly is not an MC and by most accounts not that good of a rapper either. But according to Clark Kent things like flow, intonation and the style in which you say your rhymes are attributes of rapping and not MCing so that would not affect it. Dialect and location also apparently do not have a bearing on whether or not one can be considered an MC. So yeah, still pretty confused as to the definition of an MC. When I first started listening to this music I thought I understood what an MC was, it was actually a pretty simple definition, a master of ceremonies, someone who can move the crowd with the words they said. But in the late 80s that all changed, and so began a 30 plus year debate as to what was and what was not MCing and who was and who was not a real MC. Ive watched many of the documentaries and read much of the literature on this subject and still am no closer to finding an asnwer. I have even studied and found patterns in the top 10, 20 and 50 greatest MCs lists by apparent hip hop credible publications and outlets such as Billboard, Complex, XXL, MTV and The Rolling Stones Magazine. Unfortunately those patterns did not lead to any conclusive definition as the patterns were based on location, distinct dialects and what labels they were signed to and as most MC authoritarians will tell you, those things dont have anything to do with who gets to hold the title of MC