Conservative group behind Aff. Action lawsuit is now suing West Point over using race in admission

CopiousX

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
14,698
Reputation
5,148
Daps
72,553
Pathetic pieces of shyt.
I find it hard to believe that a tiny, Inconsequential group like the japanese have an affinity group but Jewish people dont have one.


Isnt it funny how a jewish group isnt on that list? Im reminded of the task force at the DOE to stop racism that only targeted anti-semitism.:patrice:
 

Marc Spector

the 4'11 Cuban
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
14,331
Reputation
4,151
Daps
54,914
Reppin
The Milky Way
I find it hard to believe that a tiny, Inconsequential group like the japanese have an affinity group but Jewish people dont have one.


Isnt it funny how a jewish group isnt on that list? Im reminded of the task force at the DOE to stop racism that only targeted anti-semitism.:patrice:
1. This is the list of ethnic/gender/sexual identification/race clubs supported and sponsored by West Point for cadets to join, its not inclusive of any/all methods that cadets socialize along racial/ethnic lines (facebook groups, meeting at church or temple, etc.).

2. Believe it or not, there's way more Japanese people in the military than Jewish. Asian people who descend from nations with US military bases tend to join at higher rates. The Philippines is the only exception as there's no longer any US bases in the Philippines, but US troops still have a strong presence there (and Filipinos join the US military at a very disproportionate rate).
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
57,820
Reputation
16,111
Daps
212,562
Reppin
Above the fray.
I find it hard to believe that a tiny, Inconsequential group like the japanese have an affinity group but Jewish people dont have one.


Isnt it funny how a jewish group isnt on that list? Im reminded of the task force at the DOE to stop racism that only targeted anti-semitism.:patrice:
Jews have an organized religious community wherever they are. Those are their formal and informal "affinity" networks.




Have to laugh at you referring to a group of people as inconsequential, though.
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
57,820
Reputation
16,111
Daps
212,562
Reppin
Above the fray.

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
57,820
Reputation
16,111
Daps
212,562
Reppin
Above the fray.


08/13/25

Students for Fair Admissions drops lawsuits against West Point, Air Force Academy​


The anti-affirmative action group has found an ally in the Trump administration, which has barred race-conscious admissions in the nation’s military academies.

Z3M6Ly9kaXZlc2l0ZS1zdG9yYWdlL2RpdmVpbWFnZS9HZXR0eUltYWdlcy00NTg0NzMzMDUuanBn.webp

Dive Insight:​


In a footnote to Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard — the case that ultimately ended decades of race-conscious admissions — the court said the decision did not address the practice at the nation’s military academies.


While no military academy had been party to the case, the court effectively created a carve-out for race-conscious admissions at the institutions “in light of the potentially distinct interests that military academies may present.”


In a friend-of-the-court brief to that case, the Biden administration wrote that “the Nation’s military strength and readiness depend on a pipeline of officers who are both highly qualified and racially diverse — and who have been educated in diverse environments that prepare them to lead increasingly diverse forces.”


After the ruling came down, SFFA soon filed legal challenges against military academies and their race-conscious admissions policies.


In its 2023 complaint against West Point, SFFA alleged, “Instead of admitting future cadets based on objective metrics and leadership potential, West Point focuses on race.”


The lawsuit further argued: “West Point has no justification for using race-based admissions.”


SFFA’s cases against West Point and the Air Force Academy, along with another one against the U.S. Naval Academy, were in progress when Trump retook the presidency in January.


The group quickly found it had an ideological ally in the new administration, whose policies reflect SFFA’s goals.


Hegseth banned race-based admissions at the nation’s military academies in January, days after being sworn in. In doing so, Trump’s defense secretary described diversity initiatives as “incompatible with the values of DoD,” adding that “the DoD will strive to provide merit-based, color-blind, equal opportunities to Service members but will not guarantee or strive for equal outcomes.”


Hegseth has gone much further than just rejecting race-conscious admissions at the academies. Under his leadership, the Pentagon ordered the military academies to purge hundreds of books from their libraries that deal with racism and gender issues, a move that has sparked outcry as well as lawsuits and at least one reversal.


In June, the Justice Department and SFFA asked that the group’s lawsuit against the Naval Academy be declared moot, after that institution dropped race-conscious admissions under Hegseth’s directive. The case was under appeal at the time, after a federal judge upheld the institution’s policies in December. In July, an appeals court dismissed the case in response to the request from SFFA and the Justice Department.


SFFA President Edward Blum said in a June statement, “We applaud this extraordinary accomplishment by the President and the Department of Defense which restores the colorblind legal covenant that binds together our military institutions.”
 
Top