WaddupDoe!
Steez.
I disagree. They also would be getting SEC type recruits. But me & you will never truly know.i think games like today prove that if Oregon played in the SEC they'd be .500 in conference play. gimmick team.
I disagree. They also would be getting SEC type recruits. But me & you will never truly know.i think games like today prove that if Oregon played in the SEC they'd be .500 in conference play. gimmick team.
Fold up but we dominated them in the second half?
What the is your definition of folding up? First half i give you we played like shyt. But like i said how did we fold up if we came out in the second half & dominated them?We blaming the RB for the 3rd & longs? But not giving the Ducks defense credit for that?
![]()


I disagree. They also would be getting SEC type recruits. But me & you will never truly know.
Hmmm so we folded up & went into a shell came out & dominated the second half. Isnt folding up or going into a shell means that we wouldnt have came out & dominated them the whole second half? So did MSU fold up & go into a shell too? No we played like shyt regardless of the 18 points. We left points on the field, some dumb plays & dumb mistakes.The mere fact that you keep saying second half over and over...like the first half didn't happen...let's me know...that you know...exactly what I mean about your team folding up...
You didn't play like shyt in the first half...you jumped out and scored 18 points...and then Mariotta got popped...and then your team went into a shell and MSU spent the next quarter in a half styling on them...
And then...Mariotta made a play...MSU blew a coverage that led to a touchdown...Oregon got their legs back under them...and walked away from MSU...
Give the Ducks credit for that? Breh do you only watch Pac 10 football? Langford spent all last year racking up yards against defenses putting 8 in the box against him...and I know you not trying to tell me that the ducks have some Juggernaut defense
I guess we will find out in November if it was good Oregon defense or a guy who usually gets it done just...not getting it done![]()

Hmmm so we folded up & went into a shell came out & dominated the second half. Isnt folding up or going into a shell means that we wouldnt have came out & dominated them the whole second half? So did MSU fold up & go into a shell too? No we played like shyt regardless of the 18 points. We left points on the field, some dumb plays & dumb mistakes.
Bruh you serious? So because he did it last year means its just suppose to happen this year?
No, actaully im the one that keeps saying our defense is soft & shytty. what im am tho saying is you are going to blame Langford for the 3rd & longs but wont give the Ducks defense credit? When for most of the second half our run defense stepped up.
...do you just watch Pac 10 football? Michigan State has literally spent the majority of the last decade playing the Michigan's and Ohio State's of the world tough for about two and a half quarters...and then...giving up about 28 unanswered points the rest of the way...just like they did in this game
...them beating Ohio State last year was the first time in forever when they finally hung with a good team...and gasp...didn't fukk up and lose it down the stretch...
So now we going move the goal post? Because when MSU was winning it was Ducks going to fold up & go into a shell. Now when the Ducks come out & straight dominate MSU. They didnt even score in the second half. The narrative is now MSU isnt good in the second half. So if the Ducks would have lost its same ol Ducks. Now that they win its MSU sucks.Uh yeah...they did...it's uh...Michigan State......do you just watch Pac 10 football? Michigan State has literally spent the majority of the last decade playing the Michigan's and Ohio State's of the world tough for about two and a half quarters...and then...giving up about 28 unanswered points the rest of the way...just like they did in this game
...them beating Ohio State last year was the first time in forever when they finally hung with a good team...and gasp...didn't fukk up and lose it down the stretch...
![]()
you for giving me a fun debate. 
So now we going move the goal post? Because when MSU was winning it was Ducks going to fold up & go into a shell. Now when the Ducks come out & straight dominate MSU. They didnt even score in the second half. The narrative is now MSU isnt good in the second half. So if the Ducks would have lost its same ol Ducks. Now that they win its MSU sucks.
So basically its a lose lose situation. So we can just agree to disagree on everything with the Ducks. But iyou for giving me a fun debate.
![]()




But tonight kills that physical bs for a little until we play Stanford. Also what you call folding up for Oregon is the first two quarters, i call playing like shyt. Helf called a horrible game. Even with the 18 points, the OL wasnt helping Mariota out. But he kept having Mariota looking down field. While Pellum & defense would straight up playing soft. We were getting any pressure on Cooks. Second half that changed.I'm not moving the goal post...I just thought it was funny that you brought up MSU choking...when anybody who watches Big 10 football or is an MSU fan can tell you that what MSU did today is classic MSU
It was just...pretty much...one team having a history of folding up when someone gets physical with them versus a team that has a history of choking when they are actually playing very well against another good team... Oregon folded up for two quarters...MSU chocked for 2 quarters![]()
The mere fact that you keep saying second half over and over...like the first half didn't happen...let's me know...that you know...exactly what I mean about your team folding up...
You didn't play like shyt in the first half...you jumped out and scored 18 points...and then Mariotta got popped...and then your team went into a shell and MSU spent the next quarter in a half styling on them...
And then...Mariotta made a play...MSU blew a coverage that led to a touchdown...Oregon got their legs back under them...and walked away from MSU...
Give the Ducks credit for that? Breh do you only watch Pac 10 football? Langford spent all last year racking up yards against defenses putting 8 in the box against him...and I know you not trying to tell me that the ducks have some Juggernaut defense
I guess we will find out in November if it was good Oregon defense or a guy who usually gets it done just...not getting it done![]()

what happen when nick fairley and them boys punked that high flying offense with lamichael james? oregon are frauds. they been frauds the last decade plus. once they play some real goons they fold up.

man re-reading this thread, you're an annoying af. your tone changed hellaaaaa quick once that tide turned, you were the main MSU cheerleader in here, just spewing all kinda hate, then Oregon came back and waxed that ass....AFTER getting 'popped' in the mouf. That right there blows your whole theory up, because MSU was physical, and Oregon still won. There is no if buts about it.The mere fact that you keep saying second half over and over...like the first half didn't happen...let's me know...that you know...exactly what I mean about your team folding up...
You didn't play like shyt in the first half...you jumped out and scored 18 points...and then Mariotta got popped...and then your team went into a shell and MSU spent the next quarter in a half styling on them...
And then...Mariotta made a play...MSU blew a coverage that led to a touchdown...Oregon got their legs back under them...and walked away from MSU...
Give the Ducks credit for that? Breh do you only watch Pac 10 football? Langford spent all last year racking up yards against defenses putting 8 in the box against him...and I know you not trying to tell me that the ducks have some Juggernaut defense
I guess we will find out in November if it was good Oregon defense or a guy who usually gets it done just...not getting it done![]()