If you're asking me do I agree that it was a massive failure on everyone involved's part to not take care of the people we deem essential to our everyday life as we ride this out from the safety of our homes? Absolutely 100%.
But I wholeheartedly disagree with you on this concept of people getting a raise to stay at home. Because as others and myself have proven to you, everyone who gets unemployment is not getting 100% of their wages. So some people got more, some got less and some got almost just right. But I would hope you would agree that instead of haggling over targeting those groups, the better solution was to pick a number and approve a blanket measure for all in the spirit of timing.
On unemployment, you shouldn't be expecting to though, I know I wasn't. I was viewing it more like short-term disability payments, where you get, say 60% of your income. 60% in regular unemployment, stimulus payment(s), and deferred bill payment for 6+ months, should be enough to keep you afloat at home.
). Bet you if tomorrow Trump said he going to invade Iran and it would cost $12 Trillion these war mongering neo- con fukkers won’t care about the debt or deficit. They would be
but to help Main Street they say “what about the national debt?
”


I'll be patient and give you one more reply. I've worked with children on the so I understand not everyone can connect the dots in front of them. You again go straight to the extremes with your example and ask me "Well what are we supppsed to do????" despite the fact numerous posters and myself have presented you with options you choose to ignore in order to pose the same question over and over in this thread. There's alot that could be said about your lack of intellectual depth but there's a microexample in your post that really sums up how nonsensical your thought process is
and please, anyone correct me if im wrong here
wouldnt want any realistic discussion in here, this looks better