Shaq should've won more than one MVP seeing as he was the most valuable player in the league for more than one season. You're the one that's vouching for the NBA and how they go about selecting the winner of the award, not I. My position is that the award is political. Sometimes politics win out over everything else regarding who's named the MVP in the NBA. Karl Malone was never more valuable than MJ, and if you truly believe that then you don't know anything about basketball.
Not too many things worse than fans with agendas.
Karl Malone had NO BUSINESS winnin those MVP awards over MJ nikka..
.
and jordan had no business winning it over the dirtbag in 98.
so it evens out.
who?
malone nikka.
and the other is's
Shaq should have Nash's 1st MVP. I actually think that Nash was more deserving of the 2nd MVP even though it should've gone to Lebron. Kobe had a real good year but it wasn't better than Lebron's. Not to mention the Lakers were only a 45 win 7 seed while the Cavs won 50 games and were a 4. I know the west was tougher but guys don't control their team's schedule.True, Nash deserved the first MVP. He resurrected that team. The second one should have went to Kobe, but Nash carried the team again this time without Amare so he deserved to be in the hunt, but Kobe should have got it.![]()
and jordan had no business winning it over the dirtbag in 98.
so it evens out.
True, Nash deserved the first MVP. He resurrected that team. The second one should have went to Kobe, but Nash carried the team again this time without Amare so he deserved to be in the hunt, but Kobe should have got it.![]()