Could you kill baby Hitler [Poll added]

Would you kill baby Hitler?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Not sure


Results are only viewable after voting.

Urbanmiracle

Brooklyn the planet...
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
6,681
Reputation
2,887
Daps
23,648
Reppin
Brooklyn son
Europe and the far east was a powder keg ready to explode. You still had countries like Germany and Hungary still salty from the Treaty of Versailles and you had Japan which its eyes on Russian and Chinese ports. Then you had the war between Europeans slicing up Africa like a pizza.

Honestly, as a US citizen, its a "good" thing Hitler did what he did. Without WW2 and Hitler's Holocaust, no Operation Paperclip in which we transported Europe's brightest out of the warzone into the safe arms of top US universities that allowed them to continued their sciences unabated by the war. No Manhattan project which leads to no atomic bomb which leads to no feasible way to defeat Japan ( they were coming for us eventually. The US fleet was right over the Pacific and they would give us a look over as they started taking over islands leading closer to the US. Pearl Harbor was them thinking they caught us sleeping) and no NASA and no Space Race.
 

Tate

Kae☭ernick Loyalist
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
4,274
Reputation
795
Daps
15,042
When did American empire become a good thing? Why is American empire worth the life of 6 million Jews?
 

Solomon Caine

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
3,121
Reputation
375
Daps
8,815
I couldn't kill an adult Hitler, let alone a baby one. Way I see it, he never harmed anyone that looked like me. Let the Europeans have their karma.
 

Tate

Kae☭ernick Loyalist
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
4,274
Reputation
795
Daps
15,042

Dirty Mcdrawz

Your girl loves em....
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,089
Reputation
1,343
Daps
28,261
18erwx8w17p80jpg.jpg

18erwx8vu33adjpg.jpg

18erwx8vvbob5jpg.jpg


Don't think I could do it:patrice:


i don't get the reference :jbhmm:
 

Solomon Caine

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
3,121
Reputation
375
Daps
8,815
Really?? You think I'm gonna take an account of the situation from some salty European or Jew. I have read books and heard hundreds of dudes speeches, never heard him or his henchmen mention black people. :yeshrug:

Maybe we should show case pictures of black Nazi soldiers, or how Hitler greeted the black runner from the U.S and pretend that the Germans where good to blacks at a time where blacks where treated horribly in the U.S. I won't do that because no one can really confirm or verify any of that stuff. So please save me the anti Nazi propaganda. I've seen enough of it on Nat Geo and History Channel.
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
107,187
Reputation
5,571
Daps
213,156
Reppin
NULL
Even if you kill him the movement was going to happen

The resentment of the Jews would of always been there
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,666
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,542
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
Got me :skip:

Ok yeah my whole answer is indeed based on the interpretation of "Would you kil baby Hitler KNOWING WHAT HE DID AFTER", to which I answer no because the hypothetical question ("Would you kill baby Hitler") does NOT adress anything else. Meaning, the ONLY thing that changed in that historical context is that Hitler does not exist. I argue that in the grand scheme of things, killing baby HItler does not change that much, because he is the product of his environment. Thus, if you don't change the environment, killing baby Hitler or not doesn't make that much of a difference.

The things that led to Hitler's rise

- Nationalism
- Antisemitism
-"Scientific" racism (these three points were everywhere in Europe)
- Pangermanism
- German thirst for revenge post Versailles Treaty
- German historical "continental" colonialism (as opposed to France's, GB's and Netherland's "overseas" colonialism)
- German's conception of nationality ("by way of blood" meaning is German who is born of German parents, as opposed to "by way of land" as in France, meaning is French who is born on French soil)

all pervade Hitler and Nazis.

Fair enough. You are of a pure heart. Thanks for entertaining my BS :smugfavre:
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,666
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,542
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
Not at all. It's more "Hitler got to live, impacted History the way he did and I'm here". But nice post, got a few daps from it too :salute:

Objectively, killing Hitler would be pointless because he was more of a catalyst than anything else. Antisemitism, fascism, the Franco-German hate etc. were already there and he was simply the match that lighted it up. There is no proof that killing him would have stopped the Holocaust (though, there is no proof that it wouldn't have either of course). I know Hitler is the boogeyman of the 20th century but he's not the only boogeyman that has ever lived in Human history. Why stopping at Hitler ? Why not Napoleon ? Why not Hannibal ? Genghis Khan ? Alexander the Great ? Attila ? History has seen and will always see conquerors/generals who kill/ed millions whatever their ideology was/is/will be and regardless of the legitimacy of their cause (we are either on the bad or the good side of History and fortunately, we the West have been in on the good one in the 20th century)

And really, going back in time to kill Hitler is at best arbitrary and has little to no legitimacy. Realistically, it would even be unfair to every casualties that happened before him and that were caused by other "boogeymen" (let alone every little/regional/local conflicts and other less deadly events...). Seriously, how would one justify killing Hitler over Attila ? Over Genghis Khan ? And if you say "well, it's because he lived in the 20th Century". Well then, why not Pol Pot ? Why not Stalin ? Are the humans killed by Hitler/the Nazis and during WWII worth more than those killed in every other eras of History ? And even if the reason to kill Hitler is legit, how do you know that killing Hitler wouldn't have birthed an even more demonic person and resulting in a even bigger body count ? :lupe:

Ultimately, what happened happened and that's why I said that out of selfishness, I wouldn't kill him. It may be cynical but there's no reason to change the past. We can only learn from it to avoid making the same mistakes. Mistakes that we will still make either way in the future, that's how Humanity is :manny:

Great post fam. Well thought out imo.

Thanks for seeing my post as a lighthearted jab :russ:. I think some people actually think I'm a heartless blood thirsty poster after this thread.
 
Top