Bruh, that's your perspective. You really think that women spit on short men. Then that's you bruh. Like I said, my daddy's 5'4 and a hoe. My bf is 5'-8/9 and a hoe. My brother is 5'8 and couldve been a hoe and married. I dated and simped men shorter than them.Not projection. Calling out hypocrisy. You've been conditioned to want certain uncontrollable traits in a man and it's "OKAY'. He's been conditioned to want certain uncontrollable traits in a woman, and its "BAD". That's hypocritical. If I"m projecting, so are all these dark skin women crying about colorism trying to use their ancestors' torment to shame people into wanting them
By women hating on short men, they're saying shorter men are less valuable, not worthy of respect, less of a man, inferior, not a real man. And the illogical part about it is the men they're talking about are TALLER THAN THEM (5"7 - 5"9) or at EQUAL HEIGHT. They're just saying those things because those men aren't above 6 foot.
Being short is not more aligned with being flat chested/flat assed because men are alot more willing to date women with those traits and aren't openly discriminating against them with the same level of vitriol that women use toward men to don't align with what they feel is the right level of masculinity (i.e. being tall).
Im not emotional. Youre not coming at me with an intelligent argument and it's a waste of my time.Why so emotional? I already showed you how necessity and desire can overlap and how the loudest voices can manipulate public opinions in terms of majority.
But are you going to speak up and counter the public opinion you don't agree with and let your voice be heard?
The loudest voices made Nate Parker's Nat Turner movie a dud at the box office. So don't tell me they aren't the majority.![]()
Im not emotional. Youre not coming at me with an intelligent argument and it's a waste of my time.
i didnt argue that they couldn't overlap. You are the one who said it was an oxymoron. Words mean things and if you arent going to use them how they mean, I can't communicate with you.
Bruh there's only so many times I am willing to go back and forth with a nikka before I stop caring. A need is necessary, essential, a must have, if you can live/exist without it or exclude it then it ceases to be a need. It becomes a want.English words most times don't have singular meaning, hence there is a branch of linguistics called: semantics. And your inability to understand semantics is the problem here.
I explained how need/necessity and want/desire can overlap, thus making the argument you're projecting an oxymoron.
So, the least you can do is to accept that black feminists are confused/conflicted.
Bruh there's only so many times I am willing to go back and forth with a nikka before I stop caring. A need is necessary, essential, a must have, if you can live/exist without it or exclude it then it ceases to be a need. It becomes a want.
The overlap is that you can want things that you need and you can want things that you dont need.
Grown ass women do not need to be in a relationship with a man to survive. They may want it but they can survive and still be a woman without a man.
End of argument.
I don't think you wrote "grown ass women don't need a man to survive" (I'm assuming you mean heterosexual women) with a straight face. 

Black woman attitude and neck wavingBlack woman sharing your culture
White woman pleasantness and happinessWhite woman not understanding your culture
I think it evens out![]()
:uhaight:this 6foot thing, where the hell did this come from? I never remember females giving that much a fukk about height.
You're obsession with Black women is annoying. You don't even date them. Can ya'll neg this guy, please?
That failed miserably
You quoted me like 20 times already and you only been here 5 days
Imma put your stupid ass on ignore in about five seconds 
Your obsession with me is annoying faggit. You created a whole thread about meThat failed miserably
You quoted me like 20 times already and you only been here 5 days
Imma put your stupid ass on ignore in about five seconds
![]()
