Damn, is this the worst week for conservatives ever?
- Thread starter Dusty Bake Activate
- Start date
The Watcher
Judging you from afar
I can't wait for the clown show presidential debates where Jeb and them have to answer why they've spent all their time on the wrong side of history.
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
Nah he isn't. They're just both conservatives from Ohio.
ExodusNirvana
Change is inevitable...
Pretty sure Cheney has cybernetic enhancements...he'll be around when we're his age now
On another note, I'm really worried about minorities of all shades and persuasions right now. There is a lot of shyt going on that is making the conservative right wing of this country even more batshyt crazy than usual. And considering that this country doesn't really address mental health issues, we're gonna see a lot more violence going forward. I just hope that no one that I love or am close to gets caught up in some madmans attempt to reconcile his feelings with reality.
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
OG_StankBrefs
Da Spice...
Julius Skrrvin
I be winkin' through the scope
@cook
Please put this rumor to bed.
I wouldn't classify myself as conservative... socially liberal, fiscally somewhat conservative. Not a fan of the government, D or R.
I sure as shyt don't care if gay people marry.
Domingo Halliburton
Handmade in USA
just talking to @Brady Hoke's Artery in the stock thread he's way smarter than @KingpinOG ever was.
Brown_Pride
All Star
not only the wrong side of popular opinion but also of history. From Rap to politics history will look back on the South and the GOP like we look back at 80's fashion...
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Are you on the wrong side of history, friend?
Perhaps we can touch on it on the next podcast.
we will
edit:
Rather than wait a week for the podcast let me say; if you proposed that government ought to issue friendship licenses in order for friendships to be allowed, you would be accused of being a rabid totalitarian who wants the government to involve itself in the private lives of the subject population at the most intimate levels. If you propose that government ought to issue marriage licenses granting permission for two people to be married, you are like 99.5% of the rest of the population. There is no categorical difference between these two viewpoints, they are both equally authoritarian, yet the latter is considered permissible while the former is not.
Gay people nationwide can now receive permission slips from the government allowing them to be gay...It's sad that this is considered tolerance. Obviously, if government must monopolize the institution of marriage, it should do so for both gay and straight couples, since marriage is, or rather should be, a private contract, and private property is a human right not contingent on sexual preference.
It's sad that marriage remains a socialist institution. It typifies the most menacing of police state intrusion into the private lives of its subjects, as exemplified by my "friendship license" example. It used to be a fully private institution. The idea that marriage should be monopolized by the state has its origins in the proto-communist ideas of the French Revolution, and in the U.S., it only became a public institution to prevent interracial marriage -- hardly the epitome of tolerance of others. The present state of marriage is preferable to the one of yesterday, but it is only marginally worthy of celebration IMO.
Gay people nationwide can now receive permission slips from the government allowing them to be gay...It's sad that this is considered tolerance. Obviously, if government must monopolize the institution of marriage, it should do so for both gay and straight couples, since marriage is, or rather should be, a private contract, and private property is a human right not contingent on sexual preference.
It's sad that marriage remains a socialist institution. It typifies the most menacing of police state intrusion into the private lives of its subjects, as exemplified by my "friendship license" example. It used to be a fully private institution. The idea that marriage should be monopolized by the state has its origins in the proto-communist ideas of the French Revolution, and in the U.S., it only became a public institution to prevent interracial marriage -- hardly the epitome of tolerance of others. The present state of marriage is preferable to the one of yesterday, but it is only marginally worthy of celebration IMO.
Last edited:
ExodusNirvana
Change is inevitable...
I'd put a flattop on an elephant but they are endangered so I don't want to disrespect them like that
The dualities tho
The dualities tho
